Analysis from Leadership Perspective Answer

  • 54000+ Project Delivered
  • 500+ Experts 24x7 Online Help
  • No AI Generated Content
- +
35% Off
£ 6.69
Estimated Cost
£ 4.35
3 Pages 781Words

Who are more successful? Rulers or Supporters: An analysis from Leadership perspective.

Get free written samples by our Top-Notch subject experts and Online Assignment Help team.

Due to the obvious widespread digital revolution, every firm is now an information company. Volatility and turbulence in the workplace have driven the development of adaptable methods. Adaptive and charismatic leaders may create a productive working framework that encourages people to achieve common goals in a dynamic environment than autocratic leaders. According to Ali, Wang, and Johnson, (2020), working conditions impact job satisfaction because employees would like a pleasant physical work environment. As a result, such an atmosphere will lead to a higher degree of job satisfaction. New developments need the creation of new tactics and talents.

Leadership analysis

(Source: Nelson and Squires, 2017)

Therefore, Adaptive leadership views such shifts as a unique opportunity to enhance the capability to grow and places a premium on diversity. Effective diversity management is key to global company success. Aside from organisational contributions, companies that value differences as well as provide opportunities for their representatives to fully utilise their potential provide individual contributions to staff members such as confidence and pride, as well as morale, effective communication, job satisfaction, high performance, teamwork, and loyalty (Nelson and Squires, 2017).Numerous leadership styles exist, and no style is inherently good or bad. As a result, every leader has a unique voice and style to dealing with others and undertaking new initiatives. In order to be an authority, someone must have profound knowledge and expertise in the subject matter at hand. If you don't, authoritative leadership won't work. In situations when collective decision-making is impractical due to time constraints, this approach is preferable. Adaptive leadership styles, on the other hand, would increase the effectiveness of team members under the direction of more capable leaders. Many companies, on the other hand, are unable to keep up with the shifting trends. Also, charismatic leaders are characterized by a leader's ability to influence people via communication, conviction, and appeal. Organizations in crisis or trying to move ahead benefit greatly from charismatic leaders because of their capacity to connect deeply with others (Sy, Horton, and Riggio, 2018).

Having a team of leaders that can interact with workers is critical for the long-term viability of a company. Traditional approaches to problem-solving are at odds with the adaptive leadership approach. The ability to manage one's emotions and manage relationships empathetically is a hallmark of adaptive leaders. As they perceive the 'people' at the heart of the problem, leaders with compassion are more equipped to meet adaptive problems. Embracing learning and growth is an important part of adaptive leadership. Leaders should never be averse to experimenting with new approaches to issue solving. Even if the ideas they come up with don't work, they should promote creativity and innovation from their workers. In addition, charismatic leaders have always had the capacity to inspire people and create high levels of commitment, confidence, and contentment (McClean and Collins, 2019). Thus, as compared to less charismatic leaders, their subordinates tend to see them as being more effective. Adaptive and charismatic leadership styles are found to be more successful than autocratic leadership by two general managers representing two different companies in an interview. The capacity of employees to have confidence in their leadership, and vice versa, is what leads to a good working relationship. Mistrust is at the heart of the authoritarian leadership style. Leaders must start with the assumption that their employees are underperforming, necessitating their direct supervision in order to guarantee that outcomes are achieved. They do not establish a long-term working connection, which results in decreased production as a result of reduced morale among the workforce (Sy, Horton, and Riggio, 2018). So, because reputation of the autocratic leader is at stake, not those of the person performing the task, people in positions of authority tend to closely monitor every aspect of the job. Workers find it extremely difficult to perform their jobs when authoritarian bosses turn into extreme micromanagers who constantly demand reports on their employees' activities and whereabouts. That causes production to fall rather than rise as time passes.

Adaptive as well as charismatic leadership styles are critical in today's fast-paced corporate climate to ensure organisational success. Adopting an adaptable strategy calls for thinking outside the box and questioning the status quo. An adaptable leader is much more concerned with the route that is beneficial for the organization's members as a whole than he is with the processes that govern the commercial sector.


35% OFF
Get best price for your work
  • 54000+ Project Delivered
  • 500+ Experts 24*7 Online Help

offer valid for limited time only*