Appraising The Financial Viability Of A New Project In A Media Marketing Company Assignment

Comparative Analysis of Air-Filtering System and Retail Outlet Conversion for Media Marketing.

  • 72780+ Project Delivered
  • 500+ Experts 24x7 Online Help
  • No AI Generated Content
GET 35% OFF + EXTRA 10% OFF
- +
35% Off
£ 6.69
Estimated Cost
£ 4.35
9 Pages 2156 Words

Appraising The Financial Viability Of A New Project In A Media Marketing Company Assignment

This report tends to the difficulties looked at by Media Marketing, a Birmingham-based marketing agency and shared work area supplier. It investigates the decrease in client participation because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the developing interest in adaptable workplaces. The report examines two choices: putting resources into an air-filtering system for their downtown area or changing over an empty retail outlet on the edges of Birmingham. It centres around the huge elements of cleanliness and area and plans to foster techniques for adjusting to the evolving market.

Need premier assignment writing help in the UK? Look no further than New Assignment Help. Our team of expert writers is here to provide you with high-quality, tailored assignments that meet your specific requirements. We offer free samples to showcase our expertise and ensure you are satisfied with our services. With New Assignment Help, you can achieve academic success with ease.

Analysis & Discussion

Calculation of Payback Period

 Payback Periods

Figure 1: Payback Periods

(Source: MS Excel)

The payback period calculations show that both Project A and Project B have somewhat short recompense periods. Project A, with an underlying speculation of - £360,000, recuperates its project slowly and arrives at a total income of £44,000 by Year 5. Project B, with underlying speculation of - £150,000, likewise recuperates its project inside a comparable period, with a combined income of £48,000 by Year 5 (Moro-Visconti, et al. 2020). By and large, these discoveries recommend that the two projects have ideal recompense periods, permitting leaders to survey the time expected to recover their speculations and make very educated project choices [Referred to Appendix 1].

Calculation of Accounting Rate of Return

Accounting Rate of Return

Figure 2: Accounting Rate of Return

(Source: MS Excel)

The Accounting Rate of Return (ARR) estimations show that Project B has an essentially better yield on project contrasted with Project A. With an ARR of 9%, Project B creates an arrival of 9% for every unit of introductory speculation yearly. Conversely, Project A has a lower ARR of 4%, meaning it produces an arrival of 4% every year. This recommends that Project B has a more prominent productivity potential and might be a more appealing speculation choice in light of accounting returns (Rose, et al. 2021). Notwithstanding, it's vital to consider different factors, for example, risk, income designs, and key arrangements to go with very educated speculation choices.

Calculation of Net Present Value

Net Present Values

Figure 3: Net Present Values

(Source: MS Excel)

The Net Present Value (NPV) calculations show that both Project A and Project B have positive profits from speculation. Project A, with an underlying investment of - £360,000, produces an NPV of £255,984.15, demonstrating a huge potential for profitability. Project B, with an underlying investment of - £150,000, has an NPV of £116,569.85, implying a positive return too (Cricelli, and Strazzullo, 2021). In the examination, Project A shows a higher NPV, proposing possibly higher profitability. These discoveries give important experiences to chiefs to assess speculation feasibility and figure out which task offers more prominent potential for financial returns [Referred to Appendix 2].

Appraisal of the viability of each project

To adjust to the changing working society and address client concerns, Media Marketing is thinking about two key choices: investing in an air-filtering system for their super business domain in the downtown area (Project A) or changing over an empty retail outlet on the edges of Birmingham into another common work area (Project B). This report assesses the suitability of each project utilizing three techniques: Payback Period, Accounting Rate of Return (ARR), and Net Present Value (NPV). The discoveries will give a suggestion on the most reasonable task for Media Marketing’s future achievement.

Payback Period Evaluation

The payback period estimations uncover the time expected to recover the underlying project for each task (Owolabi, et al. 2020). Project A has a compensation period assessed to fall between Year 4 and Year 5, while Project B likewise has a recompense period between Year 4 and Year 5. The two projects have generally short restitution periods, demonstrating a positive profit from the investment.

Accounting Rate of Return (ARR) Evaluation

The ARR computations decide the profitability of each project in light of the profit from the investment. Project A has an ARR of 4%, demonstrating a 4% profit from speculation every year (Unsworth, et al. 2021). Project B, then again, has a higher ARR of 9%, recommending a better yield on speculation. This suggests that Project B has a more prominent potential for productivity contrasted with Project A.

Net Present Value (NPV) Evaluation

The NPV computations evaluate the current worth of future incomes and give experiences into the benefit of each task. Project A creates a positive NPV of £255,984.15, showing that the current worth of future money inflows surpasses the underlying speculation. Essentially, Project B likewise yields a positive NPV of £116,569.85, demonstrating a positive profit from speculation (Camilleri, 2021). The two tasks show profitability, however, Project A has a higher NPV, demonstrating the more noteworthy potential for productivity.

In view of the assessment of the three strategies, it is suggested that Media Showcasing seeks after Project A, putting resources into an air-filtering framework for their vital business domain in the downtown area. Several justifications support this recommendation:

  • Higher NPV: Project A yields an essentially higher NPV of £255,984.15 contrasted with Task B's NPV of £116,569.85. This recommends that Project A has a more prominent potential for long-haul benefits and better yields on the investment.
  • Comparable Payback Period: The two projects have comparative restitution periods falling between Year 4 and Year 5. Subsequently, the restitution time frame alone doesn't give a critical benefit to one or the other task.
  • Balanced Risk and Innovation: Putting resources into an air filtering system lines up with the huge element of "Cleanliness" distinguished in the exploration. Tending to cleanliness worries during the Coronavirus pandemic can draw in clients and impart trust in their well-being. Furthermore, upgrading the current business domain mirrors a decent methodology by utilizing the generally settled foundation and enhancing the ongoing work area.
  • Location Advantage: project A, situated in the downtown area, offers an upper hand regarding openness, keeping away from traffic, and simplicity of stopping. This lines up with the huge element of "Area" distinguished in the examination, which assumes an essential part in drawing in clients to shared work areas.

Project A, including the interest in an air filtering system for Media Marketing's real business bequest in the downtown area, is suggested (McArthur, 2023). It displays a higher NPV, lines up with the recognized variables of cleanliness and area, and uses the current foundation. By tending to client concerns and giving a protected and open work area, Media Marketing can adjust to the changing working society, draw in new clients, and work on its general benefit. It is critical for Media Marketing to screen the continuous effect of the pandemic and adjust their techniques likewise to guarantee long-haul outcomes in the common work area market.

Other potential capital investment projects

To give alternative capital investment projects to Media Marketing, two choices that line up with the developing necessities of the objective market and have the potential for benefit are:

1. Technology Upgrades and Innovations

Investing in technology upgrades and innovations can significantly upgrade Media Marketing's contributions and draw in educated business people. This Project includes executing the most recent innovative headways, for example, high-speed internet, brilliant office robotization, coordinated effort instruments, and virtual gathering arrangements. By giving state-of-the-art innovation and working with consistent computerized encounters, Media Marketing can take special care of the rising interest in adaptable workplaces that depend on cutting-edge advanced frameworks (Chueca Vergara, and Ferruz Agudo, 2021). This speculation wouldn't just draw in new clients yet in addition increment consumer loyalty and maintenance. Moreover, it positions Media Marketing as a groundbreaking and imaginative promoting organization, recognizing it from contenders.

Supporting Arguments

Developing dependence on advanced apparatuses and innovation in the present business scene. Expanded efficiency and effectiveness for business visionaries with cutting-edge innovative assets. Upper hand through separation and situating as a tech-empowered shared work area supplier. Potential for extra income transfers through innovation-related administrations and arrangements. Arrangement with the shift towards remote work and the requirement for dependable virtual joint effort stages.

2. Sustainable and Eco-Friendly Initiatives

Investing in sustainable and eco-friendly initiatives can help Media Marketing appeal to naturally cognizant business visionaries and organizations. This Project includes executing harmless to-the-ecosystem rehearses, environmentally friendly power arrangements, squandering the executive's frameworks, and feasible structure materials (Bosch, et al. 2019). By making an eco-accommodating work area, Media Marketing can draw in a speciality market section that focuses on manageability and lines up with the developing worldwide spotlight on natural obligation. This Project shows Media Marketing's obligation to corporate social obligation and positions it as a moral and ecologically cognizant promoting office.

Supporting Arguments

Expanding interest in maintainable and eco-accommodating work areas. The fascination of socially mindful business people and organizations. Cost reserve funds through energy-effective frameworks and diminished squandering. Upgraded brand notoriety and separation on the lookout. Arrangement with unofficial laws and motivators for economic practices.

While Project A, putting resources into an air filtering system, is the suggested choice in view of the given estimations, these elective projects present extra open doors for Media Marketing to investigate. Innovation overhauls and practical drives line up with current market patterns and client inclinations, offering the potential for benefit and separation. By assessing the monetary practicality, likely advantages, and arrangement with market requests, Media Marketing can settle on informed choices and decisively put resources into projects that best suit their drawn-out objectives and target market needs.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in light of the assessment of the payback period, accounting rate of return (ARR), and net present value (NPV), Project A, which includes putting resources into an air-filtering system for Media Marketing's super business home in the midtown region, is suggested. It shows a higher NPV, lines up with the critical elements of cleanliness and area, and uses the current framework. By tending to client concerns and giving a protected and open work area, Media Marketing can adjust to the changing working society, draw in new clients, and work on general profitability.

References

Journals

Moro-Visconti, R., Cruz Rambaud, S. and López Pascual, J., 2020. Sustainability in FinTechs: An explanation through business model scalability and market valuation. Sustainability, 12(24), p.10316.

Rose, G., Raghuram, P., Watson, S. and Wigley, E., 2021. Platform urbanism, smartphone applications and valuing data in a smart city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 46(1), pp.59-72.

Cricelli, L. and Strazzullo, S., 2021. The economic aspect of digital sustainability: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(15), p.8241.

Chueca Vergara, C. and Ferruz Agudo, L., 2021. Fintech and sustainability: do they affect each other?. Sustainability, 13(13), p.7012.

Bosch, J., Staffell, I. and Hawkes, A.D., 2019. Global levelised cost of electricity from offshore wind. Energy, 189, p.116357.

McArthur, J., 2023. The UK Infrastructure Bank and the financialization of public infrastructures amidst nationalist neoliberalism. Competition & Change, p.10245294231185906.

Camilleri, M.A. ed., 2021. Strategic corporate communication in the digital age. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Unsworth, H., Dillon, B., Collinson, L., Powell, H., Salmon, M., Oladapo, T., Ayiku, L., Shield, G., Holden, J., Patel, N. and Campbell, M., 2021. The NICE evidence standards framework for digital health and care technologies–developing and maintaining an innovative evidence framework with global impact. Digital health, 7, p.20552076211018617.

Owolabi, H.A., Oyedele, L.O., Alaka, H.A., Ajayi, S.O., Akinade, O.O. and Bilal, M., 2020. Critical success factors for ensuring bankable completion risk in PFI/PPP megaprojects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(1), p.04019032.

Seasonal Offer
scan qr code from mobile

Get Extra 10% OFF on WhatsApp Order

Get best price for your work

×