Investment Banking Principles And Practice Issue Sample

Introduction:Investment Banking Principles And Practice

Issue 

The concept of mergers and acquisitions investment banking transactions is regarded as complex financial deals. Business organisations are generally acquired, or have their assets sold in the context of mergers and acquisitions. Investment banking organisations play an important role to facilitate the transactions through negotiating deals, advising clients as well as managing the whole process in a strategic manner. There are multiple steps associated with mergers and acquisitions in investment banking. Preparation and strategy is the first stage and investment. Bankers generally recognise the potential sellers or buyers to analyse the overall strategic characteristics. Valuation is a crucial element in this aspect and it is related to the identification of the specific value of the target company by multiple methods like comparable company analysis, discounted cash flow as well as precedent transactions.

Mergers and Acquisitions in Investment Banking: Key Steps & UK Compliance Challenges

The UK is regarded as a highly developed nation across the globe. The legislative environment of the UK provides proper attention towards ensuring compliance within the merger and acquisitions investment banking transactions. It is crucial to mention that regulatory compliance is a major issue of merger and acquisition investment banking transactions in the context of the UK. It is the responsibility of the involved parties to ensure compliance with the Competition laws. The competition as well as market authority within the UK provides comparatively higher attention to examine the deals which can affect the overall competitive nature of the business market. The next issue is associated with market abuse regulation related characteristics. Investment banks are responsible to follow the market abuse regulation for preventing the concept of insider trading as well as market manipulation. It provides comparatively higher attention to ensure strict control within the information flow throughout the transaction process. Ensuring disclosure as well as transparency in merger and acquisition investment. Banking is another major issue. It is important for business organisations who are involved within merger and acquisition related transactions to fulfil the disclosure obligations as well as financial reporting. It helps to ensure transparency for the associated regulatory bodies as well as shareholders. accurate as well as timely disclosure of materialistic information is important for preventing market abuse related issues in a significant manner.

A Comprehensive Guide to M&A Investment Banking in the UK

Due diligence is recognised as a major issue in the context of mergers and acquisitions. There are legal risks within the target company and complex transactions as well as industries with particular regulatory considerations, increase the overall risk factors in a significant manner. Business organisations might face issues to manage regulatory differences as well as complexities within the cross-border transactions in the context of mergers and acquisitions related strategies. It increases challenges to ensure structural due diligence. Merger and acquisitions demand proper corporate governance structure to ensure shareholder approval. Ensuring shareholder approval is regarded as a complex process within the hostile takeovers while dealing with not satisfied stakeholders of business organisations. Overcoming the challenges associated with anti-money laundering related characteristics in larger and acquisitions is regarded as a complex task to perform. Business organisations need to understand as well as manage the tax related implications in the transaction process to ensure sustainability. The primary issue of this study is to critically analyse the role of compliance within merger and acquisition investment banking related transactions according to the basic characteristics of the UK regulatory framework.

Rule 

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) Overview

Legal guidelines or roles are regarded as the most important aspect associated with the basic characteristics of merger and acquisition related investments. It is important for multiple stakeholders associated with a merger and acquisition related strategy to ensure the legal sustainability in a strategic manner. It also focuses on ensuring transparency of merger and acquisition related investments in a strategic manner. According to the basic elements of the UK legislative environment, it can be understood that Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) is important to monitor compliance within the financial sector of the UK and it includes larger and acquisition related activities. The financial conduct authority has been developed under FSMA. FSMA highlights that authorised business organisations including investment banking organisations should conduct the overall business related activities with proper integrity as well as diligence care and skin. Business organisations should provide comparatively higher attention to ensure their activities in the context of the best possible interests of the clients and the business organisations are responsible to treat the clients in an active as well as fair manner. FSMA includes particular provisions in the context of merger and acquisitions, such as conflicts related to interest management, market abuse prevention and confidentiality as well as insider dealing prevention. This legal guideline also includes the concept of order handling as well as client communication in a strategic manner.

Limitations of FSMA

On the other hand, there are multiple limitations associated with FSMA. The legal guidelines have been developed on overachieving principles of conduct such as best interests as well as integrity. These elements are important but it is a broad concept and the legal guidelines need to be precise. It is important to introduce transaction specific legal guidelines to ensure sustainable interpretation and overcome the challenges associated with inconsistency within the application process. These misguided characteristics can introduce uncertainties for investment banking organisations and it can increase the legal risk related to non-compliance. The financial conduct authority is highly responsible to enforce the basic principles of FSMA. It is specifically dependent on negotiation as well as persuasion for assuring compliance. This approach might provide comparatively higher efficiency in specific cases, but it is not capable of addressing recurring or serious compliance breaches related issues in a significant manner. Comparatively stronger enforcement powers or abilities, including the capability of revoking, licences or suspending and increasing the amount of fines can be effective to ensure the overall integrity. FSMA requires business organisations to manage the issues associated with conflicts of interest. However, it is a specifically challenging element in the context of mergers and acquisition related transactions where investment banks generally act for different parties with effectively conflicting interests. The legal guidelines are highly dependent on the concept of self-reporting as well as internal procedures and it is not sufficient to prevent the negative aspects associated with unethical conduct and ensure the concept of fair outcomes for all the involved parties within merger and acquisition strategy.

Takeover Code Overview

Takeover code is regarded as a non-statutory code and it is not a formal law. It is crucial to mention that the takeover code is capable of holding comparatively higher authority and it is generally enforced by the panel within the takeovers and mergers. The legal characteristics of this Code are applicable to the sector of public company acquisition related strategies within the UK. It provides a comprehensive framework to ensure transparent as well as fair takeovers in a significant manner. There is major compliance related requirements according to this court. For instance, all the involved parties should follow the guidelines of mandatory disclosure obligations in the context of target companies as well as acquirers. It ensures equal as well as fair treatment for all the involved shareholders in a significant manner and the prohibition related to misguided statements is regarded as the most important principle associated with this court. This is crucial to overcome the basic challenges associated with market manipulation related characteristics in a strategic manner.

Limitations of the Takeover Code

On the other hand, there are multiple limitations associated with the basic principles of the Takeover Code. It is important to mention that the takeover code is regarded as a self-regulatory court and it is not a formal law and it limits the overall potential as well as capability of the legal characteristics. There is limited legal enforceability of the takeover code and it highlights generic questions regarding the authority of this legal guideline within the challenging cases. The panel on takeover and mergers is responsible to enforce the legal characteristics of the takeover code. Generally, the panel has a strong reputation and the basic compliance related characteristics is generally high in this case. However, the non-statutory status of this legal guideline might generate uncertainty within the complex cases. The Takeover Code might face criticism or challenges in the context of subjectivity within specific provisions. Specific major provisions like the requirement of good faith are subject to interpretation. It can generate potential inconsistencies within the application process. There are no specific as well as strong legal outline to ensure the overall integrity of this court on a long-term basis and it might affect the overall sustainability of the application process. Investment banking organisations might face challenges to predict the decisions of the panel regarding particular compliance related elements. The overall scope of the takeover code is limited as it only focuses on the acquisitions of public companies in the UK. It is not directly focused on the compliance related risk within the merger and acquisition related deals in private companies. Major concerns associated with insider trading and conflicts of interest are not followed in an appropriate manner in the Takeover Code. The basic principles of the takeover code can be described as reactive enforcement. For instance, the enforcement role of the panel is regarded as a reactive element and it can increase time delay related challenges while addressing compliance related issues. It is not an effective element to prevent the harm of markets or the shareholders.

Competition Act 1998 Overview

The Competition Act 1998 is described as one of the most effective laws to ensure compliance within the merger and acquisition investments. This act is enforced by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to ensure a stable as well as healthy competition within the UK business market. Application of this act is regarded as a crucial element against the mergers and acquisitions related strategies which can affect businesses as well as customers through reducing competition and creating monopoly within the UK business market. Application of this law is important to promote the concept of fair markets in a strategic manner. It prevents the basic elements associated with the anti-competitive merging strategies. This law is crucial to provide equal opportunities to each business organisation in the UK and promote the concept of innovation as well as consumer choice within this business market. It can influence the concept of high quality products or services and low prices. The act ensures that the involved parties within merger and acquisition related strategies should notify the CMA for an appropriate review. This method is crucial to ensure transparency within merger and acquisition related investments in a strategic manner. It is important to mention that transparency is crucial to generate public trust as other stakeholders might get equal as well as fair chance to ensure their integrity. This act is important to provide comparatively higher flexibility in the case approaches. For instance, CMA is responsible to analyse the basic characteristics of each larger and apposition related strategy according to particular circumstances. The CMA analyses the overall potential impact of each merger and acquisition on the market based on the characteristics of each element.

Limitations of the Competition Act 1998

On the other hand, there are multiple limitations associated with the implementation of the Competition Act 1998. Uncertainty as well as delay is regarded as a major limitation of this act. The review process of merger might be complex as well as lengthy and it can lead towards uncertainty related to business organisations and delay the overall deals in a significant manner. small business organisations who have comparatively limited resources can face huge challenges in this case. Application of this act might describe legitimate mergers or acquisitions related investments as anti-competitive because of insufficient data as well as the complex dynamics of the markets. It can increase the amount of unnecessary burden within the business organisations and affect the overall efficiency of the specific deals. The legal characteristics of this act are limited as it primarily focuses on the mergers and acquisitions related strategies in the UK business market. Global mergers which include UK based organisations are not covered in this law. The enforcement of this law demands stable collaboration with the international competition authorities in a strategic manner. The CMA can face limitations in the context of expertise as well as resources to analyse complex merger related elements specifically in the highly specialised industries. This element can increase or raise cons regarding the overall effectiveness of this review process. The overall nature of the market is dynamic and it is important for the CMA to adapt to the continuously changing nature of the markets as well as new business models. Lack of adaptability can introduce gaps within the regulation sector and the act will not be capable of accessing the highly specialised mergers in a significant manner.

Get Extra 10% OFF on your WhatsApp order!

use my discount

Bribery Act 2010 Overview

The Bribery Act 2010 is regarded as an important tool against corruption within the merger and acquisition investment banking transaction related elements. The basic principles of this law criminalise both individuals or organisations who are offering as well as receiving bribes. This law also introduces a failure to prevent bribery offences in the context of commercial organisations. It highlights a strong ethical framework within the context of the deal making activities. The strict penalties of this act includes the concept of unlimited imprisonment as well as fines. It highly raises stakes in the context of bribery to act as a powerful element for business organisations and individuals involved within the merger and acquisition related deals. This may be important to establish a comparatively higher transparent as well as ethical merger and acquisition environment across the UK. Application of this law is capable of increasing the concept of corporate accountability. The failure to prevent bribery element of this law includes business organisations responsible to ensure appropriate as well as suitable anti bribery techniques as well as procedures throughout the merger and acquisition process. This law is capable of criminalising both foreign and domestic organisations who are involved in bribery. The increased reach of this law is regarded as one of the most crucial elements to ensure transparency as well as integrity within the merger and acquisition related strategies. The act is capable of demonstrating the commitment of the business organisation towards ethical conduct and it is capable of enhancing the overall reputation within investors, consumers as well as partners. The law is crucial to establish positive impacts on the overall success of the deal and ensure long-term relationships within the business organisations.

Limitations of the Bribery Act 2010

There are multiple limitations associated with the Bribery Act 2010. For example, the business organisations involved within acquisition and merger related incidents might face complication related issues due to its broad scope. Compliance requirements is a major element of this act but there might be major concerns in the context of uncertainty avoidance in this sector. There are legal as well as practical limitations of this law to apply the basic principles in the context of bribery occurring within the foreign jurisdictions. Corruption practices are common in merger and acquisition related incidents in the UK but it can recognise a stable strategy as a corruption related incident. Poor knowledge and less access to information can influence the hired authority to make sustainable organisations as corrupted. The fairness related elements associated with penalties can be critically analysed as there is no balanced approach. The adaptability of this act is not flexible and it has the potential to affect its long-term sustainability. 

Limitations of the Data Protection Act 2018

The basic characteristics of the Data Protection Act 2018 are regarded as crucial legal characteristics in the context of data safeguarding. The margins and acquisition strategies demand proper flow as well as exchange of valuable data. This act is successful to ensure transparency through protecting the overall privacy of the different shareholders in merger and acquisition. Responsible data handling is a major element in this act to ensure integrity. Unauthorised data access is a major concern in the context of mergers and acquisition related strategies and the legal guidelines are capable of safeguarding sensitive as well as valuable information in a strategic manner. The legal aspects are capable of promoting the concept of ethical as well as responsible data management elements. It is capable of reducing the risk factors in the context of data breaches in a merger and acquisition strategy. Business organisations generally exchange large amounts of data in merger and acquisition related strategies. It is crucial to mention that the legal guideline is crucial for ensuring sustainable characteristics in the data exchanging sector. All the involved parties can be assured of transparency and clear communication regarding data exchanging due to the existence of this law in merger as well as acquisitions. Business organisations and individuals generally need comparatively higher control within the data management sector. This method is important to generate trust within the all involved parties. The legal element is highly influential to ensure complete integrity and save data handling related measurements. On the other hand, providing comparatively less attention towards interpreting, the technology advancements in mergers and acquisitions can affect sustainability. 

On the other hand, there are multiple limitations associated with the basic elements of the Data Protection Act 2018. For instance, merger and acquisition related transactions generally include the concept of data transfer across international borders. Navigating the rules of this act and ensuring sustainable or required permissions for such transfers might be time consuming as well as complex. It can increase the number of hurdles within the execution of the deals. Comparatively smaller investment banks generally have resource related issues and expertise related issues to fulfil the requirements of this act. It can increase disadvantages for small and medium sized enterprises in the UK to handle the critical aspects.

Application 

Practical evidence of law application is regarded as a crucial element to understand the overall reliability of the legal guidelines. According to the basic characteristics of the UK business market, it can be understood that FSMA is considered as the most prominent and effective act to ensure the overall integrity of mergers and acquisitions related investments in a strategic manner. Some case study examples can provide in-depth knowledge regarding the efficiency and accuracy of this act. In the case of merger between Standard Chartered and Bank of Dubai International in 2010, the legal guidelines of FSMA were successful to handle this element. Standard Chartered is regarded as a popular British multinational banking organisation and this banking institution proposed a merger with a popular bank titled Bank of Dubai international. The FCA raised huge concerns regarding the capital adequacy of the Standard Chartered bank and its overall governance structure which can affect the financial stability of the company. The legal guidelines of FSMA have empowered FCA to introduce effective revisions regarding the terms of the merger. The legal guidelines demanded that the standard chartered bank should address the capital conference before proceeding the deal in a significant manner. The intervention has influenced the requirement of a revised agreement which can enhance the capital position of the banking institution and make proper improvements within the governance framework of the organisation. The successful implementation of the legal guidelines of FSMA have protected the overall interests associated with the shareholders. It was successful to prevent the potential risks associated with the national financial system.

The merger between GlaxoSmithKline and Unilever in 2018 has also been critically analysed based on the legal aspects of FSMA. The acquisition of the consumer health division has been criticised due to the requirements of fairness as well as transparency in this high profile segment. The principles of FSMA in the context of market integrity as well as insider trading portrait and important role to ensure the strict disclosure of the basic requirements. It has successfully prevented the basic issues accessed with market manipulation to ensure the major investors are equipped with appropriate information for making the most informed decisions. It is crucial to mention that both Unilever and GSK have ensured sustainable transparency throughout the beating process. Both organisations have disclosed the crucial data according to the regulatory requirements of FSMA.

Interserve was characterised as a struggling construction organisation in 2019 and the organisation experienced allegations of making misguided statements throughout a merger and acquisition related negotiations. It has raised concerns regarding the overall market integrity as well as investor protection. The FCA was successful to introduce a quick investigation regarding the misguided information of the company. The investigation was successful to discover major differences within the financial reporting structure of the company. This method has helped to protect the investors from potential losses due to misguided information and it has showcased the basic principles associated with transparency within FSMA.

On the other hand, there are multiple examples regarding the limited characteristics as well as failure of FSMA to ensure integrity within the mergers and acquisitions related investments. Royal Bank of Scotland has been criticised regarding its financial stability during 2012. However, the FCA was not able to make strict action in the context of the merger and acquisition related activities of this bank. It has raised criticism regarding the ability of this law to address systematic risks within the financial system to ensure sustainability. Vodafone has been criticised for holding information from shareholders at the time of its acquisition of Kabel Deutschland. FCA has investigated this issue but did not introduce any sanctions on the company. This incident has raised concerns regarding the ability of this act to make large multinational companies accountable for non-compliance.

The legal guidelines of Takeover Code have successfully handled multiple concerns associated with mergers and acquisition related activities for a long time period. For instance, the takeover of Kraft on Cadbury has been criticised. Kraft is regarded as a popular American Food Corporation and it introduced aggressive tactics such as last stage bid increase and public pressure as well as conditional offers in the takeover process. It has affected the overall sustainability of the cd shareholders. The takeover panel gained Complaints from Cadbury as well as its stakeholders and made effective decisions. The panel has strongly criticised the tactics of the American food company and influenced the company to extend the offer period. It has helped the shareholders of Cadbury to gain comparatively higher time for considering the revised offer in a strategic manner. The American food company has been forced to provide transparent as well as clear information to enable the shareholders to gain sustainable access regarding the required details. This intervention has helped the shareholders of Cadbury to overcome the basic challenges associated with potential manipulation.

Fox made an attempt to acquire satellite broadcaster Sky. The initial offer of Fox excluded a particular stakeholder class of Sky. It has affected the voting rights of the specific class of shareholders and provided comparatively higher advantage to the other shareholders which was unfair. The panel has identified the potential disparity and internet in this case in the context of fair opportunity as well as equal treatment related principles. According to the demand of the panel, Fox was forced to revise its initial offer and make proper extension related elements for all the shareholders of the other company. It has ensured sustainable equality within voting rights and the benefits of the specific deal.

On the other hand, there is multiple evidence which can support the limitations of the Takeover code. Pru is characterised as an insurance company in the UK and this organisation was agreed to be acquired by an Asian competitor titled AIA. The deal has been approved by the panel despite the increasing concerns regarding the financial viability as well as due diligence related issues. The deal has collapsed because of financial issues and shares have raised concerns regarding the initial approval of the panel. It has raised concerns regarding the overall importance as well as credibility of the code to manage appropriate risk assessment related characteristics in critical cases. Hargreaves Lansdown proposed to take over Brewin Dolphin. In this case, the allegation regarding insider trading has been evident who can affect the trading decisions as well as share prices. The panel has investigated this issue and the insider trading related issue has been overlooked. It has raised major concerns regarding the responsiveness of this law to address the abusive nature of the market which can affect the overall confidence of the investors.

The Competition Act 1998 is regarded as a major legal guideline to ensure the overall competitive characteristics of a market. It focuses on ensuring the sustainability and transparency of mergers and acquisition related investments to ensure long-term competitive characteristics of the market. ASDA and Sainsbury are recognised as two major market chains in the UK. The proposed merger between these two organisations read major concerns regarding the dominance of the market and it can generate monopoly within the supermarket business of the UK. The share of both organisations might exceed 30% and it can increase the overall cost of the prices and decrease the variety of products. The proposed larger can affect the competitive nature of the UK business market. The CMA introduced a detailed investigation into this proposed merger. The investigator highlighted that the proposed merger can lead towards a substantial effect on market competition. It has blocked the deal to prioritise consumer interests. The CMA has overlooked the short-term gains from the specific merger related strategy and it highlighted the overall suitability of the Competition act, 1998 to ensure sustainability.

Ryanair and Aer Lingus are regarded as competitors of each other. Ryanair tried multiple times to acquire the other organisation to ensure comparatively higher control within the European as well as Irish airline industry. It has raised concerns regarding the competitive characteristics of the market which can affect the overall service quality and other characteristics provided by airline organisations. The CMA has successfully investigated the acquisition related attempts of Ryanair. all the investigations have indicated that the proposed merger might affect the overall characteristics of the customers and the CMA rejected all the proposals to safeguard the nature of competition within the airline sector.

The merger between Facebook-Giphy has been criticised as well as raised questions regarding the overall capability of CMA. CMA introduced a £50.5 million financial fine in the context of non-compliance with information requirements. It has affected the overall competitive nature within the digital advertising sector and the decision attracted criticism to underestimate the long term efforts of anti-competitive characteristics of the dominance of Facebook within the digital space. This case highlights that the financial fine was not sufficient to fulfil the long-term objectives associated with the preservation of the competitive characteristics in the business field. It is crucial to analyse as well as characterise the unique elements of each larger in a strategic manner to introduce the most appropriate as well as effective strategies. The CMA was successful in handling multiple cases in a strategic manner, but it faced criticism in different sectors to ensure its long term integrity.

Conclusion 

The overall discussion highlights that FSMA is successful in providing proper shape compliance within mergers and acquisitions transactions. However, there are multiple limitations associated with the integration of this legal framework. Real life examples have been provided to make in-depth analysis regarding the negative aspects or limitations associated with these legal characteristics. The FSMA is highly dependent on negotiation as well as partition which might be not effective to address recurring as well as serious compliance related breaches. It is important to provide comparatively higher enforcement powers to the FCA to ensure the overall integrity. The government authority of the UK can Critically analyse the initiatives taken by the US. For instance, the US Securities and Exchange commission has introduced strong enforcement powers. It includes returning illegal profits as well as lifetime industry banks for violating the legal aspects.

Addressing conflicts of interest is a major concern for FSMA. For instance, most of the investment banks generally work for multiple parties in a merger and acquisition scenario. Introducing strong guidelines as well as disclosure requirements to manage conflicts of interest can ensure comparatively higher transparency. It can reduce the risk elements associated with unethical practices as well as biased advice. The government authority of the UK can take inspiration from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. This organisation introduced the requirement of clear disclosure regarding the potential conflicts of interest. It also mandates that the business organisations should implement crucial strategies for preventing data leakage within the conflicting customers or clients. Application of this framework is crucial to promote the concept of ethical as well as transparent techniques throughout the merger and acquisition related transactions. It is important to adjust or modify the legal aspects of other countries based on the requirements of the UK. The cultural characteristics and business scenario of the UK are completely different from countries like Hong Kong. The government authority of the UK can introduce a dedicated team to critically analyse the legal transparency and characteristics of other countries to improve its Legal system.

Introducing technological advancements within FSMA can be a major advantage for the UK. For instance, FSMA generally depends on the traditional financial instruments. The traditional instruments are not capable of completely capturing the major complexities associated with the emerging technologies such as algorithm, trading and block chain. The government authority of the UK can Update the provisions as well as the regulatory framework of the act for identifying the opportunities as well as risk elements introduced by new and advanced technologies. The Singapore Monetary Authority can be a major international inspiration to utilise technological advancements within the legal framework. It includes a "sandbox" technique to allow innovative fin tech business organisations to make proper experiments under effective as well as controlled conditions. It helps to make proper regulations which are effective for emerging technologies. This proactive approach is regarded as a major driver of innovation to mitigate the potential risk elements associated with the technological advancements within the financial sector. cross-border cooperation is another major weakness of FSMA. Navigating cross-border mergers and acquisitions investments is a challenging element. Harmonisation of the regulatory characteristics with the international financial authorities has the potential to streamline the process of cross-border merger and acquisitions. This method is important to ensure consistency within the compliance standards. On the other hand, providing comparatively less attention towards understanding the basic requirements of the market can affect the overall integrity in a significant manner.

Reference list 

[1] Mills, Annie, and Peter Haines. Essential strategies for financial services compliance. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. [Online] <https://library-collections-search.westminster.ac.uk/permalink/44WST_INST/5drrjn/alma997028682203711> Accessed 13.01.2024

[2] Ramakrishna, Saloni. Enterprise compliance risk management: an essential toolkit for banks and financial services. Vol. 641. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. [Online] <https://library-collections-search.westminster.ac.uk/permalink/44WST_INST/1bvdkbr/alma997059157203711> Accessed 13.01.2024

[3] Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

[4] Grebey, James F. Operations due diligence. McGraw-Hill Publishing, 2011. [Online] <https://library-collections-search.westminster.ac.uk/permalink/44WST_INST/1bvdkbr/alma99693229250311> Accessed 13.01.2024

[5] Boatright, John R. Ethics in finance. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [Online] <https://library-collections-search.westminster.ac.uk/permalink/44WST_INST/5drrjn/alma997393514303711> Accessed 13.01.2024

[6] Thetakeoverpanel.org.uk (2024). The Takeover Code. [Online] <https://www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/code.pdf> Accessed 13.01.2024

[7] DePamphilis, Donald. Mergers and acquisitions basics: all you need to know. Academic Press, 2010. [Online] <https://booksite.elsevier.com/samplechapters/9780123749499/01~Front_Matter.pdf > Accessed 13.01.2024

[8] D'Alvia, Daniele. Mergers, Acquisitions and International Financial Regulation: Analysing Special Purpose Acquisition Companies. Routledge, 2021. [Online] <https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=pc5JEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT16&dq=Mergers+%26+Acquisitions+2016+(Sweet+%26+Maxwell+International+Series)&ots=FS98v_Fbun&sig=TH1vGj-F-ODryC12e6iFfetHYlQ> Accessed 13.01.2024

[9] The Competition Act 1998

[10] Coates, John C. "Mergers, acquisitions, and restructuring: Types, regulation, and patterns of practice." (2015). [Online] <https://library-collections-search.westminster.ac.uk/permalink/44WST_INST/1b7kp0c/cdi_oup_oho_10_1093_oxfordhb_9780198743682_013_29> Accessed 13.01.2024

[11] The Bribery Act 2010

[12] Clerc, Christophe, et al. "A legal and economic assessment of European takeover regulation." (2012). [Online] <https://www.ceps.eu/download/publication/?id=7787&pdf=Takeover%20Bids%20Directive%20book%20-%20Final.pdf> Accessed 13.01.2024

[13] Data Protection Act 2018

[14] Diekmann, Thomas Philip. Das Vertrauen des Vorstandsmitglieds auf Rechtsauskünfte. DUNCKER UND HUMBLOT, 2019. [Online] <https://www.lw.com/admin/Upload/Documents/Global-MnA-Book-of-Jargon_2018.pdf> Accessed 13.01.2024

[15] Adams, David. Banking and Capital Markets 2020. College of Law Publishing, 2020. [Online] <https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/2038169?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1> Accessed 13.01.2024

[16] Mwangi, Miriam M. The Effect of Mergers and Acquisitions on the Financial Performance of Commercial Banks Listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange. Diss. University of Nairobi, 2021. [Online] <http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/160519/Miriam%20Muthoni%20Mwangi-%20Project.pdf?sequence=1> Accessed 13.01.2024

[17] Mogaji, Emmanuel, and Emmanuel Mogaji. "Brand Mergers and Acquisitions." Brand Management: An Introduction through Storytelling (2021): 207-224. [Online] <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-66119-9_10> Accessed 13.01.2024

[18] Haynes, Andrew. "The law relating to International banking." The Law Relating to International Banking (2018): 1-480. [Online] <https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.uow.idm.oclc.org/monograph?docid=b-9781784519599> Accessed 13.01.2024

[19] Pignataro, Paul. Financial modeling and valuation: a practical guide to investment banking and private equity. Vol. 876. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [Online] <https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/financial-modeling-and/9781118558690/> Accessed 13.01.2024

[20] Krantz, Matthew, and Robert R. Johnson. Investment banking for dummies. John Wiley & Sons, 2020. [Online] <https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/investment-banking-for/9781119658597/> Accessed 13.01.2024

[21] Haentjens, Matthias, and Pierre de Gioia Carabellese. European banking and financial law. Routledge, 2015. [Online] <https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/2018240> Accessed 13.01.2024