21 Pages
5307 Words
Business Economics & Finance In A Global Environment Assignment
1: Introduction
Link to a reliable source for assignment help in the UK — New Assignment Help — to enhance your academic performance.
In this assignment a detailed synopsis of the global business economics shall be conveyed thoroughly along with determining the relevant financial aspects existing in a global environment. The primary emphasis of this assignment shall be further provided for discussing the available budgeting approaches for a company to necessitate proper flow and management of financial records and expenses. In order to proceed with this assignment, necessary importance shall be further provided for discussing the investment appraisal techniques using the NPV, IRR, Payback and Discounted Payback methods. Subsequent numerical adherence and discussion on this assignment shall be weighed by considering the relevant and proposed income and expenditure budgets available for the company to consider. The company available for detailed analysis of this assignment is considered to be Clark Cask Logistics Plc (CCLP). Necessary recommendations shall also be offered to CCLP with regards to how finances could be monitored, whether investment in a new long-term project should be facilitated and selection of an appropriate budgeting approach.
2: Budgeting Approaches Available
The availability of budgeting approaches is considered to be a vital financial parameter for the company concerned CCLP for enhancing cost optimisation and long-term cost savings. As per explanations and illustrations of Schick (2018), the availability of budgeting approaches also ensures an organisation to cater market and industry pro longingness to enable durability and sustainability in the near and foreseeable future. Following is the detailed discussion of budgeting approaches available for the company concerned CCLP.
2.1: Rolling Budgeting
The primary budgeting approach that an organisation can facilitate is considered to be the rolling budgeting. As idealised and narrated by Ostaev et al. (2019), the main principle of employing rolling budgeting can be associated with updating the budget period on a rollover basis when the old or pre-existing budgeting period is completed. Hence, the feature or the principle of rollover aids an organisation to ensure that a particular budget is being used over a long time. Basic advantages attached with the application and implementation of the rolling budgeting can be considered as possessing a greater degree of flexibility in preparation. Thus, the preparation of rolling budgeting can aid the concerned managerial spearhead of CCLP to encourage and minimise essential operational costs over a prolonged period of time.
2.2: Activity Based Budgeting
In addition to the adherence to rolling budgeting, activity-based budgeting is also considered to be an important budgeting technique, which facilitates perpetual control and monitoring of financial resources for an organisation. As per illustrations and observations of Nikulina, Butyugina & Gorbunova (2019), the activity-based budgeting further regulates the way in which an organisation can control its finances and costs with respect to operational activities planned to be undertaken. Moreover, the activity-based budgeting is also considered to be a helpful tool as it necessitates cost allocations where maximum costs could be provided to products possessing a greater market demand. The application of this budgeting approach shall augur better financial aesthetics for CCLP to establish long-term profitability in the foreseeable future.
2.3: Top-Down Budgeting
In addition to the application of activity-based budgeting, the top-down budgeting approach can also be employed by organisations to facilitate proper cost planning and strategies (Wildavsky, 2018). The application of top-down budgeting by an organisation can be a complex yet fruitful one as involvement of all levels of an organisation is required to be followed. The budget is usually prepared by the top-level management of an organisation and it is further conveyed to all subordinates and existing levels of an organisation. The application of this budgeting approach shall also establish a higher degree of command and centralisation for CCLP to ensure reduction and obliteration of operational and ancillary costs.
2.4: Bottom Down Budgeting
Bottom-Down Budgeting is considered to be the fourth important budgeting approach where the relevant organisational body can also ensure harmonisation of cost savings in the near and distant future. Saguin (2019), expressed and viewed that bottom down budgeting can be considered as a polar opposite to the top-down budgeting where budgets are initially screened and prepared by the lower levels. Subsequent information and communication of the budget is then being relayed to the upper-level management of an organisation. The application of this budgeting approach shall further enable the management of CCLP to facilitate integrated budgeting preparation and presentation in a harmonised manner.
3: Investment Appraisal Techniques, Implementations and Computations
In order to facilitate the appropriate calculation of investment appraisal techniques, implementations and computations the following assumptions are being proposed.
- It is assumed that the cash outflows include costs of replacement, cost of heavy goods vehicle and the costs of building as well as consider the initial cash outflow with respect to acquisition costs involved in equipment
- Marginal Costing approach shall be subsequently followed with respect to adherence for variable costs, sales, fixed costs and their associated figures.
- It is expected that the entire project duration shall consist of a total duration span of 20 years.
Computation of Cash Outflow
|
Cost of Budling
|
£ 35,00,000.00
|
Cost of Heavy Goods vehicle
|
£ 1,20,000.00
|
Cost of Replacement for Other Vehicles
|
£ 24,000.00
|
Cost of Other Equipment
|
£ 2,28,000.00
|
Total Expected Cash Outflows
|
£ 38,72,000.00
|
According to the above table of cash outflow calculations for Clark Casc Plc. It can be considered that the calculation of expected cash outflows has considered the values of building costs, heavy goods vehicle, replacement costs of other vehicles and costs of other equipment. Following is the detailed synopsis of the computation of cash inflows for the company concerned CCLP.
Computation of Cash Inflows (000)
|
Particulars
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
Jan
|
Total
|
Sales
|
£ 1,865.02
|
£ 1,942.73
|
£ 2,023.68
|
£ 2,108.00
|
£ 2,129.00
|
£ 2,156.00
|
£ 2,170.00
|
£ 2,190.00
|
£ 2,214.00
|
£ 2,324.70
|
£ 2,440.94
|
£ 2,562.98
|
£ 26,127.05
|
Variable Costs
|
£ 399.00
|
£ 402.00
|
£ 405.00
|
£ 407.00
|
£ 409.00
|
£ 412.00
|
£ 416.00
|
£ 400.00
|
£ 422.00
|
£ 423.00
|
£ 418.00
|
£ 417.00
|
£ 4,930.00
|
Contribution Margin
|
£ 1,466.02
|
£ 1,540.73
|
£ 1,618.68
|
£ 1,701.00
|
£ 1,720.00
|
£ 1,744.00
|
£ 1,754.00
|
£ 1,790.00
|
£ 1,792.00
|
£ 1,901.70
|
£ 2,022.94
|
£ 2,145.98
|
£ 21,197.05
|
Fixed Costs
|
£ 12,356.00
|
£ 689.33
|
£ 689.33
|
£ 689.33
|
£ 689.33
|
£ 689.33
|
£ 689.33
|
£ 689.33
|
£ 689.33
|
£ 689.33
|
£ 689.33
|
£ 689.33
|
£ 19,938.67
|
Profits (Cash Inflows)
|
-£ 10,889.98
|
£ 851.40
|
£ 929.35
|
£ 1,011.67
|
£ 1,030.67
|
£ 1,054.67
|
£ 1,064.67
|
£ 1,100.67
|
£ 1,102.67
|
£ 1,212.37
|
£ 1,333.60
|
£ 1,456.65
|
£ 1,258.39
|
According to the above table of cash inflows calculation for Clark Casc Plc. It can be considered that the value of cash inflows or profits is considered to be GBP 1258.39 on an annual basis. The calculated value of cash inflow on an annual basis is considered to remain uniform for all twenty years of the project. Following is the detailed synopsis of the investment appraisal techniques using, NPV, IRR, Payback and Discounted Payback methods.
Calculation of Investment Appraisal (000)
|
Years
|
Cash Flows
|
Discounting Factor @ 9%
|
Discounted Cash flows
|
Cumulative Discounted Cash Flows
|
Cumulative Cash Flows
|
0
|
-£ 3,872.00
|
£ 1.00
|
-£ 3,872.00
|
-£ 3,872.00
|
-£ 3,872.00
|
1
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.90
|
£ 1,134.71
|
-£ 2,737.29
|
-£ 2,613.61
|
2
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.81
|
£ 1,023.18
|
-£ 1,714.11
|
-£ 1,355.22
|
3
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.73
|
£ 922.62
|
-£ 791.50
|
-£ 96.83
|
4
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.66
|
£ 831.93
|
£ 40.44
|
£ 1,161.56
|
5
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.60
|
£ 750.17
|
£ 790.60
|
£ 2,419.95
|
6
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.54
|
£ 676.43
|
£ 1,467.04
|
£ 3,678.34
|
7
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.48
|
£ 609.95
|
£ 2,076.99
|
£ 4,936.73
|
8
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.44
|
£ 550.00
|
£ 2,626.99
|
£ 6,195.12
|
9
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.39
|
£ 495.94
|
£ 3,122.93
|
£ 7,453.51
|
10
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.36
|
£ 447.20
|
£ 3,570.13
|
£ 8,711.90
|
11
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.32
|
£ 403.24
|
£ 3,973.37
|
£ 9,970.29
|
12
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.29
|
£ 363.61
|
£ 4,336.98
|
£ 11,228.68
|
13
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.26
|
£ 327.87
|
£ 4,664.86
|
£ 12,487.07
|
14
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.23
|
£ 295.65
|
£ 4,960.50
|
£ 13,745.46
|
15
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.21
|
£ 266.59
|
£ 5,227.09
|
£ 15,003.85
|
16
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.19
|
£ 240.39
|
£ 5,467.48
|
£ 16,262.24
|
17
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.17
|
£ 216.76
|
£ 5,684.24
|
£ 17,520.63
|
18
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.16
|
£ 195.46
|
£ 5,879.69
|
£ 18,779.02
|
19
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.14
|
£ 176.24
|
£ 6,055.94
|
£ 20,037.41
|
20
|
£ 1,258.39
|
£ 0.13
|
£ 158.92
|
£ 6,214.86
|
£ 21,295.80
|
Net Present Value
|
£ 6,214.86
|
Discounted Payback
|
4.03
|
Payback Period
|
4.92
|
Internal Rate of Return
|
32%
|
Average Rate of Return
|
32.50%
|
According to the above table of investment appraisal using, NPV, IRR, Payback and the discounted payback method, the net present value has been calculated as GBP 6214.86. Subsequently, the discounted payback period and the payback period have been calculated as 4.03 and 4.92 years respectively. Moreover, the Internal rate of return and the accounting rate of return has been calculated as 32% and 32.50% respectively. Hence, as per the detailed aesthetics of the project investment appraisal favourable measurements have been witnessed with regards to potential commencement and implementation of the project. Following is the detailed synopsis of the income and expenditure budgets prepared for Clark Cask Logistics Plc.
4: Proposed Income and Expenditure Budgets
Budget for the year ending April 30th 2023 of refrigerated goods division
|
SALES UNITS
|
Jan (£)
|
Feb (£)
|
Mar (£)
|
Apr (£)
|
May (£)
|
Jun (£)
|
Jul (£)
|
Aug (£)
|
Sep (£)
|
Oct (£)
|
Nov (£)
|
Dec (£)
|
TOTAL (£)
|
Total Sales Units
|
4417
|
4858.7
|
5344.57
|
5879.027
|
6466.9297
|
7113.62267
|
7824.984937
|
8607.483431
|
9468.231774
|
10415.05495
|
11456.56045
|
12602.21649
|
Sales value of per unit
|
Funds from Owners
|
1520
|
INCOME
|
Total Sales volume
|
2,20,850
|
2,42,935
|
2,67,229
|
2,93,951
|
3,23,346
|
3,55,681
|
3,91,249
|
4,30,374
|
4,73,412
|
5,20,753
|
5,72,828
|
6,30,111
|
47,22,719
|
Actual Income
|
Received Cash/Same Month 20%
|
44170
|
48587
|
53445.7
|
58790.27
|
64669.297
|
71136.2267
|
78249.84937
|
86074.83431
|
94682.31774
|
104150.5495
|
114565.6045
|
126022.1649
|
9,44,544
|
Received in 30 days 25%
|
55212.5
|
60733.75
|
66807.125
|
73487.8375
|
80836.62125
|
88920.28338
|
97812.31171
|
107593.5429
|
118352.8972
|
130188.1869
|
143207.0056
|
157527.7061
|
11,80,680
|
Received in 60 days 25%
|
55212.5
|
60733.75
|
66807.125
|
73487.8375
|
80836.62125
|
88920.28338
|
97812.31171
|
107593.5429
|
118352.8972
|
130188.1869
|
143207.0056
|
157527.7061
|
11,80,680
|
Received in 90 days
|
66255
|
72880.5
|
80168.55
|
88185.405
|
97003.9455
|
106704.3401
|
117374.7741
|
129112.2515
|
142023.4766
|
156225.8243
|
171848.4067
|
189033.2474
|
14,16,816
|
TOTAL INCOME
|
220850
|
242935
|
267228.5
|
293951.35
|
323346.485
|
355681.1335
|
391249.2469
|
430374.1715
|
473411.5887
|
520752.7476
|
572828.0223
|
630110.8245
|
47,22,719
|
Year to Date
|
66255
|
72880.5
|
80168.55
|
88185.405
|
97003.9455
|
106704.3401
|
117374.7741
|
129112.2515
|
142023.4766
|
156225.8243
|
171848.4067
|
189033.2474
|
14,16,816
|
Moving Monthly Average
|
102695.25
|
112964.775
|
124261.2525
|
136687.3778
|
150356.1155
|
165391.7271
|
181930.8998
|
200123.9898
|
220136.3887
|
242150.0276
|
266365.0304
|
897441.1079
|
28,00,504
|
COST OF SALES
|
Casual Staff
|
50
|
110
|
140
|
45
|
65
|
45
|
25
|
95
|
85
|
65
|
15
|
26
|
766
|
Fuel and Oil
|
150
|
155
|
165
|
145
|
154
|
178
|
142
|
126
|
129
|
124
|
145
|
195
|
1,808
|
Staff training cost
|
18.75
|
18.75
|
18.75
|
18.75
|
18.75
|
18.75
|
18.75
|
18.75
|
18.75
|
18.75
|
18.75
|
18.75
|
225
|
Administrative staff training cost
|
1375
|
1375
|
1375
|
1375
|
1375
|
1375
|
1375
|
1375
|
1375
|
1375
|
1375
|
1375
|
16,500
|
Gas and electricity supplies (fixed cost)
|
15000
|
15000
|
15000
|
15000
|
15000
|
15000
|
15000
|
15000
|
15000
|
15000
|
15000
|
15000
|
1,80,000
|
Depot operatives’
|
22.9
|
22.9
|
22.9
|
22.9
|
22.9
|
22.9
|
22.9
|
22.9
|
22.9
|
22.9
|
22.9
|
22.9
|
275
|
Sub-Total Cost of Sales
|
16617
|
16682
|
16722
|
16607
|
16636
|
16640
|
16584
|
16638
|
16631
|
16606
|
16577
|
16638
|
1,99,574
|
EXPENDITURE
|
Building maintenance
|
7000
|
7000
|
7000
|
7000
|
7000
|
7000
|
7000
|
7000
|
7000
|
7000
|
7000
|
7000
|
84,000
|
Vehicle maintenance cost
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
1,800
|
Building depreciation
|
4666.7
|
4666.7
|
4666.7
|
4666.7
|
4666.7
|
4666.7
|
4666.7
|
4666.7
|
4666.7
|
4666.7
|
4666.7
|
4666.7
|
56,000
|
vehicle insurance costs
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
2,400
|
other vehicles cost
|
6400
|
6400
|
6400
|
6400
|
6400
|
6400
|
6400
|
6400
|
6400
|
6400
|
6400
|
6400
|
76,800
|
average salary of operatives
|
153583
|
153583
|
153583
|
153583
|
153583
|
153583
|
153583
|
153583
|
153583
|
153583
|
153583
|
153583
|
18,43,000
|
drivers’ salary
|
2917
|
2917
|
2917
|
2917
|
2917
|
2917
|
2917
|
2917
|
2917
|
2917
|
2917
|
2917
|
35,000
|
Bonus of staff
|
768
|
768
|
768
|
768
|
768
|
768
|
768
|
768
|
768
|
768
|
768
|
768
|
9,215
|
TOTAL EXPENSES
|
175685
|
175685
|
175685
|
175685
|
175685
|
175685
|
175685
|
175685
|
175685
|
175685
|
175685
|
175685
|
21,08,215
|
CASH SURPLUS/DEFICIT
|
28548.75
|
50569
|
74822
|
101660
|
131026
|
163357
|
198981
|
238052
|
281096
|
328462
|
380567
|
437789
|
24,14,930
|
The culminating value of profitability achieved by consideration of total cost of sales and revenues is thus considered to be GBP 21,08,125. Khalifa, & Scarparo (2021) narrated and idealised that business projections, usually deploy a significant importance on the business expansion avenues, which is usually substantiated based on lower and optimised costs and prospects of high revenue generating attributes. Moreover, the concerned managerial spearhead of CCLP is also required to keep leeway for making amendments in the budget for suiting best and plausible organisational aesthetics and dynamics. Financial crises are also needed to be considered by the concerned management of CCLP for mitigating potential financial risks in the near and foreseeable future.
5: Conclusion
In this assignment, a detailed synopsis of budgeting approaches has been covered wit respect to activity based, top and bottom down and rolling budgeting. Further importance has been provided on determining the capital budgeting or investment appraisal techniques, which consists of NPV, IRR, Payback and discounted payback methods where favourable propositions have been witnessed. Subsequently, the computation of expenditure and income budget for refrigerated goods division has been conducted where cash surpluses have been established in abundance. Adherence to future risks and making necessary amendments is also needed to be considered by the management of CCLP for ensuring better financial aesthetics in the near and foreseeable future.
6: Recommendations
R1: It is recommended to Identify Cost Monitoring Prospects
The primary recommendation proposed to CCLP consists of identification of cost monitoring prospects. The identification of cost monitoring prospects shall further enable the organisation to determine where costs could be saved and what necessary activities could be conducted that would lead to high turnover generation.
R2: It is recommended to choose Activity-based optimise costs
The second recommendation proposed to the concerned management of CCLP is considered to be related with choosing activity-based budgeting approaches for optimising costs. The selection of activity budgeting shall enable the company to locate potential high demanded products and allocate costs accordingly. Moreover, the production planning phase for low demanded products can be minimised for saving costs and other operational resources.
R3: It is recommended to employ strategic planning for establishing higher accord in future operations.
The employment for strategic planning for achieving higher accord in future operations is mostly considered to be in line as per the investment appraisal criteria. As the NPV is positive, it is recommended to select the project and establish credible future operational planning to nullify spillage of costs. Hence, it is recommended that the new project being appraised and calculated is needed to be selected as it contains the prospects of higher future revenue generation.
References
- Khalifa, R., & Scarparo, S. (2021). Gender Responsive Budgeting: A tool for gender equality. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102183
- Nikulina, S. N., Butyugina, A. A., & Gorbunova, E. E. (2019, October). Investment activity in conditions of automation use of budgeting system. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 341, No. 1, p. 012217). IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/341/1/012217
- Ostaev, G. Y., Gogolev, I. M., Kondratiev, D. V., Markovina, E. V., Mironova, M. V., Kravchenko, N. A., & Aleksandrova, E. V. (2019). Strategic budgeting in the accounting and management system of agricultural enterprises. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6(4), 8180-8186. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37284415
- Saguin, K. (2018). Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting. World Development, 112, 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.009
- Schick, A. (2018). Budgeting for results: recent developments in five industrialized countries. Performance-based budgeting, 129-146. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429498411-9/budgeting-results-recent-developments-five-industrialized-countries-allen-schick
- Wildavsky, A. (2018). Budgeting as a political process. In The Revolt Against the Masses (pp. 338-349). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351302920-19/budgeting-political-process-aaron-wildavsky