15 Pages
3754 Words
Introduction: Trauma-Informed Care: Understanding Crime Theories in the UK
The establishment of different psychological behaviors in the aspect of the justice system introduces a crucial paradigm of movement assessing the complex interaction between different variables such as behavior of the humans and the legal framework. Observing different criminal scenarios, most of the crime and criminal actions have deep roots with complex psychological perspectives. Different psychological assessments deliver strong insights related to the mental conditions of people and also signify different perspectives related to potential influential factors that provide relevant influence in sentencing with different rehabilitation plans. Moreover, acknowledging various cognitive procedures included in criminal behavior has significant support to examine various preventive strategies and several targeted interventions. Various issues connected with the subjectivity of psychological assessments and potential ethical aspects are very crucial for maintaining the balance.
In this aspect, Beyond Youth custody of the UK is a very relevant context. This assessment highlights a significant relationship between several influential factors such as trauma, abuse, and violent crime among young people. In the UK, the connection between crime, trauma with psychological factors among youngsters is very significant. Many young individuals involved in various crimes have experienced abuses like traumatic situations directing and changing their behavior and characteristics related to psychological aspects in individuals. Relevant subjection related to abusive behavior, and negligence with violence between communities provides an influence to the development of antisocial activities and crime in all over the UK. different psychological factors such as compulsion control, insecurities, and dysfunctional functions play a crucial role in young individuals in criminal functions. Observing the relevant relation is vital for implementing effective interference that highlights both the psychological effect of trauma and the deep connection between criminal behavior in young individuals of the UK.
Discussion
Theories on Psychological Perspectives and Influence of Behavior
In the context of psychological theories based on trauma, and abuses with different psychological factors, the two most relevant theories are such as trauma-informed care theory and resilience theory very relevant theories in this aspect. These theories deliver a strong base for the Ministry of Justice in the UK to execute different practices based on trauma-informed care within the criminal justice framework.
Trauma-informed care theory
This theory is based on an overfinding framework that introduces a delicate acknowledgment and directing to the noteworthy effect of trauma. This theory is well connected with the principles related to safety, security, relationships, different choices of matter, trustworthiness, and authorization aspects. This theory provides relevant support in the context of recognizing several traumas in young people's lives and tries to develop an environment that encourages healing aspects (Duke, et al. 2020). With the help of the criminal justice system in the UK, incorporating trauma-informed care includes observing the signs with the relevant impacts related to trauma, establishing a trauma-sensitive environment, and signifying different interventions to indicate the specific necessities of trauma survivors. Critically assessing the theory related to trauma-informed care in the aspect of the Ministry of Justice, it is identified that embracing this aspect can affirmatively impact different perspectives related to the criminal justice system. To support this theory, perspectives related to training legal experts, various law enforcement official members, and several correctional workers to identify trauma and respond to the trauma is very relevant aspects here (Case, et al. 2020). By recognizing the different perspectives of these professionals, the system becomes well-equipped to tackle several cases that include several individuals who experienced abuses previously. This approach also represents the significance of communication, reducing factors related to retraumatizing aspects, and the role of fairness and justice in handling these trauma-related cases.
Resilience theory
This theory complements the previous theory by highlighting the different capabilities of young people to adapt positively in the aspect of distress. Different resilience attributes such as social support, abilities of mastery, and coping abilities play a vital role in reducing the effect of trauma. Incorporating resilience theory into different trauma-informed practices authorizes different functions related to the Ministry of Justices to not only highlight the negative impacts related to trauma but also draw attention to help individuals by serving string insights with different functions for recovery (Sriwiyanti, et al. 2021). In the aspect of crucial assessment, this resilience theory introduces balanced aspects connected with a trauma-informed approach. By aligning resilience-developing strategies, the criminal justice system can provide empowerment to several individuals to get rid of experiences and traumatic situations and mitigate the issues related to re-offending aspects. This incorporates wide strategic targets related to rehabilitation and reintegration context, playing a crucial role in generating a more effective human justice framework.
Similarities and differences between theories
Trauma-informed care and resilience theory have similar backgrounds due to the same concentration of individuals who have experienced trauma. However, these two theories have differentiation by nature and several applications.
Similarities and differences of theories
Holistic approach
Both trauma-informed care and resilience theory signified a holistic approach to acknowledging different experiences of people in the aspect of trauma, abuse, and psychological perspectives. In the aspect of these theories, recognition of trauma impacts, different perspectives related to the life of the person, and several psychological, social with emotional effectiveness are very significant aspects.
Strength-oriented approaches
Both theories gained the significance of identifying the strengths of individuals. Trauma-informed care focuses on developing a supportive environment that authorizes different personnel, side by side resilience theory directs different aspects based on recognizing and developing deep-rooted strengths to develop coping mechanisms.
Differences
Focus and emphasis
Trauma-informed care fundamentally concentrates on forming systems and cultures that are responsive to trauma, significantly connected with different safety measures with the prevention related to re-traumatization aspects (Motz, et al. 2020). In comparison, resilience theory introduces significant support to different internal resources for individuals and the relevant capacity that concentrates on developing different resilient factors.
Preventions and enhancements
In the context of trauma-informed care theory, this is considered a preventive approach that targets reducing the negative effect of trauma and developing a supportive system that mitigates the risk related to re-traumatization aspects whereas resilience theory is more focused on developing the ability of trauma-experienced people and strengthening different abilities in the aspect of development and different positive adaptations.
Application in interventions
Trauma-informed care theory is a less applied theory in organizations and various system settings. On the other hand, resilience theory is applied at the level of the individual, providing interventions that strengthen different coping abilities, social support, and self-effectiveness.
Understanding of social influence on behavior
An acknowledgment related to trauma-informed care and resilience theory in the aspect of different psychological aspects is extensively relevant to different public services in the UK with the critical for understanding social effectiveness in behavior. Trauma-informed care identifies the systematic nature related to trauma assessing the structure related to society and its influence on reducing the effects of trauma (Sowerbutts, et al. 2021). Different public services enlightened by trauma-informed care are more relevant in the aspect of highlighting different challenges that conserve various aspects related to trauma and develop more dependable outcomes. Lastly, an acknowledgment related to trauma-informed care and resilience theory is extensively significant to public services in the UK. By aligning this theory with the framework, public services can develop a relevant culture and environment that are connected with the supportive nature of individuals that provide different psychological necessities establish resilience aspects, and deliver to more equitable support system. This crucial integration incorporates different current principles related to human rights, various social practices, and overall well effectiveness related to individuals and communities.
Investigate theories of criminal behavior and casual factors
In the aspect of assessing a psychological theory based on real-world crime, the case related to Aaron Barley is very relevant here. This incident happened in 2017 when Aaron murdered a mother and his son. In this scenario, Barley experienced physical and sexual abuse in his childhood and also gained experience related abondance of his family and several psychological traumas. He also suffered from several mental health challenges like depression, different disorders connected with post-traumatic stress, and anxiety. Due to abuse from his parents, drug-related addiction, and stress him to kill a mother and his son and the Justice system sentenced him to life imprisonment (BBC.COM 2017). In this context, the psychological theory is post-traumatic stress disorder theory. This theory incorporates different perspectives related to attachment theory signifying different disturbances in previous trauma-centric experiences that provide relevant support in the aspect of the development of complicated trauma symptoms. As per this theory, people experience persistent abuse that enhances different insecurity patterns affecting an individual's capability to establish trust and collaboration and generate different emotions significantly. In this aspect connecting the theory related to trauma-informed care with resilience theory in the aspect of criminal behavior, trauma-informed care significantly develops environments and cultures that observe and acknowledge the effect of trauma. In the criminal justice framework of the UK, this theory introduced an understanding of relevant procedures of past trauma and its contribution to criminal behavior and developing interventions similarly.
For example, a trauma-informed approach includes observing different possible stimulates avoiding re-traumatization during different legal activities, and delivering supportive practices that monitor the unseen trauma. Resilience theory complements TIC theory and concentrates more on the capacity of individuals to take different strategies positively in the context of adversity. Based on real-world evidence, different factors related to social support, several capabilities of individuals and a sense of expertise can provide relevant support to resilience. Incorporating different resilience-developing strategies into interventions for different offenders with traumatic surroundings that target to increase the capability to handle various issues and mitigate the likelihood related to re-offending (Nascimento, et al. 2023). Assessing how the traumatic surroundings of an offender may provide a criminal behavior includes the acknowledgment of different paths in which trauma impacts cognitive development and different behavioral patterns. To adapt different strategies related to several patterns related to psychological behavior, complex trauma-oriented people may have dysfunctional coping mechanisms. Different attachments connected with insecurities can develop difficulties in establishing healthy connections serving different practices to criminal functions as a means of gaining control by assessing power.
Resilience theory provides relevant support in interventions by addressing and magnifying different existing strengths in the lives of offenders. Addressing different potential resilience aspects, various supportive social networks with different individual capabilities can be more significant in the context of forming more constructive adaptive rehabilitation strategies (Case, and Browning, 2021). Developing these strengths plays a crucial role in the capability of an individual to monitor several issues and mitigate the likelihood related to recidivism. However, incorporating trauma-informed with resilience-oriented approaches in the context of criminal justice faces issues. In this context, the absence of awareness and training among different legal professionals and the necessity related to systematic modification is very significant in assessing different inter-connectional functions. In addition, recognizing trauma in offenders needs a proper balance between several variables with dependability and acknowledgment of in-depth connection of criminal behavior (Paterson-Young, et al. 2022). Lastly, complex trauma theory delivers a supportive acknowledgment related to the psychological effect related to physical and sexual abuse that connects with different mental and health-oriented challenges and post-traumatic disorders. Incorporating two approaches of trauma-informed care with a resilience framework into the assessment of criminal behavior among young people with traumatic experiences develops the effectiveness of interventions. Assessing the contribution of trauma in outlining cognitive development and behavioral contexts establishes a more empathetic and extensive approach within the criminal justice system of the UK, connecting rehabilitation aspects with mitigating the cycle of re-offending.
Assessment of different psychological factors and its application in public services
psychological perspectives can be applied by individuals and teams in the public services to reduce criminal behaviour
The various physiological factors presence noticed in this regard, are social resources, which include emotional support, and social integration, psychological resources which include trust, and coherence sense, self-esteem, and perceived control, and physiological factors of risk which includes depressiveness, hopelessnesses, major exhaustion, and cynicism.
In terms of social resources, considering the social integration, the situations because of which in the UK youth crime is happening is not doing well in school, from school doing the traunting, difficult relationships in the family, boundaries absence and supervision partially, having friends who commit a crime, and alcohol and drug misuse (Antolak-Saper, 2020). In terms of emotional support, under the age of 18 the offenders who are present in the UK, are more likely to have complex needs of health than the wider population. Rather than the non-offenders they are more likely to engage in risky behavior of health, which includes misuse of substances, alcohol, and smoking. The suicide rate in boys who are aged 17 or 15 years and have remained in custody and sentenced, might be in the form of higher than 18 times that of the non-offenders. Some 13 to 18 years old or 18% in custody have depression (Helm, 2021). The presence of anxiety is noticed at around 10%, post-traumatic stress disorder presence is noticed at 9%, and psychotic symptoms are noticed at 5%.
Under the physiological resources in terms of perceived control, in the recent polling, it is demonstrated that, nationally 61% of crime is going up, and regarding the victims of crime 51% are worried. At a national level, the concern is noticed particularly in public regarding the very violent crimes. It includes people dealing and using drugs, and knife crime. This can point to examples in their news, and lives, that back up these worries.
Need to adopt a trauma-informed approach by Ministry of Justice
The particular Ministry of Justice has mainly made some of the efforts to adopt an additional trauma-informed approach throughout its different types of agencies, but there is a particular place for significant type of improvement.
A main area that particularly requires additional attention is mainly addressing the particular trauma along with adversity within rehabilitation programs for different offenders. Studies demonstrate the high rates of traumatic type of experiences among intern populations (Hughes, et al. 2020). Another thing is that many types of rehabilitation and reentry programs do not sufficiently protect for trauma or provide trauma-specific types of services. Another thing is reoffending rates remain so high. Nearly half of adults are mainly reconvicted within a particular one year of release.
To mainly rehabilitate along with reducing reoffending that programs must particularly recognize the overall impact of trauma upon behaviours along with providing trauma-informed type of interventions. This mainly involves different training employees, screening type individuals, and also providing trauma counselling, cognitive type of behavioural therapies, along with support groups (Viglione, et al. 2022). Preliminary particular research upon trauma-informed type of corrections demonstrates promise for improving particular outcomes. Another thing is that such type of interventions are not totally implemented within the particular justice system yet.
On the other hand, the utilization of restorative types of justice has been very limited. Restorative justice emphasizes the overall healing for different type of victims, offenders, along with the community. It mainly provides opportunities for different type offenders to develop empathy and also make changes within a supervised type of environment (Willmott, et al. 2021). Studies mainly demonstrate high type of satisfaction among participants and decreased loss relative to traditional type of prosecution. Restorative type of conferences or victim-offender type mediation could be very valuable across investigations, prisons, youth justice, along with beyond. Another thing is that restorative type programs remain a very small type fraction of the particular justice procedure.
The Ministry seeks to develop rehabilitation and also community type of integration through the help of an investigation system. But chronic type of underfunding mainly leaves investigation overstretched (Chow, et al. 2022). With very high caseloads, limited type of training, along with program availability, investigation officers mainly struggle to provide particular quality, trauma-informed type care. Investment within evidence-based interventions along with sufficient employment is also needed.
For particular youth justice, trauma-informed type of practice demonstrates different promise but is totally inconsistently implemented. Youth offending teams now mainly hide for traumatic types of experiences along with adversity factors. Another thing is that trauma training for different employees is minimal and also trauma-focused types of services remain insufficient (Shea, et al. 2021). Earlier type of intervention along with prevention is also necessary, as adversity within childhood is particularly the main root cause for many different types of youth by entering the justice system.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the interconnection between different psychological theories related to trauma-informed care and resilience theory with trauma-informed approach and different legal concerns connected with the Ministry of Justice in the UK introduces the significance of a comprehensive and strong approach to highlighting trauma within the legal framework. Different psychological theories introduce a strong base for acknowledging the deeply connected effect related to trauma on individuals mainly in young people. The relevant identification of the scenario of previous experiences that shape different cognitive development, emotional wand its behavioral contexts is critical in establishing different interventions within the relevant legal landscape. By incorporating various psychological perspectives, legal concerns gain effective insights into the different reasons related to criminal behavior, establishing a more empathetic with informed approach. Two psychological theories provide relevant support to signify the necessity for systematic modification within different legal cases and interconnecting facilities. Developing a healthy culture is also very effective in the scenario of the effectiveness of the legal system. Incorporating these theories is very effective in reducing the retraumatization aspect, developing communicative factors, and also providing a beneficial role in forming more equitable legal outcomes. Linking these aspects to legal concerns in the UK includes a proper balance between dependability with relevant acknowledgment. Here different issues also exist in incorporating these theories within a specific legal framework, involving the necessities of training, and allocation of different resources with systematic modification. However, different possible advantages such as decreased recidivism with developed mental health results highlight the importance of tackling these issues.
Reference list
Journals
- Antolak-Saper, N., 2020. The adultification of the youth justice system: The Victorian experience. Law in context, 37(1), pp.99-113.
- Case, S. and Browning, A., 2021. Child first justice: the research evidence-base [full report].
- Case, S., Haines, K., Creaney, S., Coleman, N., Little, R. and Worrall, V., 2020. Trusting children to enhance youth justice policy: The importance and value of children's voices. Youth Voice Journal, 2020(SI), pp.25-40.
- Chow, J.C., Wallace, E.S., Senter, R., Kumm, S. and Mason, C.Q., 2022. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the language skills of youth offenders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(3), pp.1166-1182.
- Duke, K., Thom, B. and Gleeson, H., 2020. Framing ‘drug prevention'for young people in contact with the criminal justice system in England: Views from practitioners in the field. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(4), pp.511-529.
- Helm, R.K., 2021. Guilty pleas in children: legitimacy, vulnerability, and the need for increased protection. Journal of Law and Society, 48(2), pp.179-201.
- Hobson, J., Twyman-Ghoshal, A., Banwell-Moore, R. and Ash, D.P., 2022. Restorative justice, youth violence, and policing: a review of the evidence. Laws, 11(4), p.62.
- Hughes, N., Ungar, M., Fagan, A., Murray, J., Atilola, O., Nichols, K., Garcia, J. and Kinner, S., 2020. Health determinants of adolescent criminalisation. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(2), pp.151-162.
- Loeffler, E. and Bovaird, T., 2020. Assessing the impact of co-production on pathways to outcomes in public services: The case of policing and criminal justice. International Public Management Journal, 23(2), pp.205-223.
- Motz, R.T., Barnes, J.C., Caspi, A., Arseneault, L., Cullen, F.T., Houts, R., Wertz, J. and Moffitt, T.E., 2020. Does contact with the justice system deter or promote future delinquency? Results from a longitudinal study of British adolescent twins. Criminology, 58(2), pp.307-335.
- Nascimento, A.M., Andrade, J. and de Castro Rodrigues, A., 2023. The psychological impact of restorative justice practices on victims of crimes-a systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), pp.1929-1947.
- Paterson-Young, C., Bajwa-Patel, M. and Hazenberg, R., 2022. ‘I ain't stupid, I just don't like school': a ‘needs' based argument for children's educational provision in custody. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(4), pp.452-469.
- Shea, L.L., Cooper, D. and Wilson, A.B., 2021. Preventing and improving interactions between autistic individuals and the criminal justice system: A roadmap for research. Autism Research, 14(10), pp.2053-2060.
- Sowerbutts, A., Eaton-Rosen, E., Bryan, K. and Beeke, S., 2021. Supporting young offenders to communicate in the youth justice system: A scoping review. Speech, Language and Hearing, 24(2), pp.87-104.
- Sriwiyanti; Saefudin, Wahyu; Aminah, Siti, 2021. Restorative justice for juvenile offenders in Indonesia: A study of psychological perspective and islamic law. J. Islamic L., 2, p.168.
- Viglione, D.J., de Ruiter, C., King, C.M., Meyer, G.J., Kivisto, A.J., Rubin, B.A. and Hunsley, J., 2022. Legal admissibility of the Rorschach and R-PAS: A review of research, practice, and case law. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(2), pp.137-161.
- Willmott, D., Boduszek, D., Debowska, A. and Hudspith, L., 2021. Jury decision making in rape trials: An attitude problem. Forensic psychology, pp.94-119.
Book
- Dowsett, J. and Craissati, J., 2020. Managing personality disordered offenders in the community: A psychological approach. Routledge.
