Research And Evidence In Health And Social Care Assignment Sample

Introduction Of Research And Evidence In Health And Social Care Assignment

The elderly are now experiencing social isolation as a notable public health problem for seniors, especially in a situation like the current COVID-19 pandemic (Edwards and Best, 2020). Not having social contact, having a small social support network, or having entrance into affiliations with others is linked to poor mental health outcomes like depression, anxiety, and cognitive decline (Drageset, 2021). The purpose of this assignment is to find out how social isolation affects the elderly’s mental health using an annotated Sources of three academic articles followed by a summary of the literature review. So, the topic is quite relevant to health and social care, given that the point makes clear that social determinants of health should be paid attention to improve the well-being of older people.

For this research, a systematic search strategy was developed. Keywords like 'social isolation,' ' mental health,' ' elderly,' and' loneliness' were used, while databases used were PubMed, Lancer, and CINAHL. Search results were refined using Boolean operators 'AND' and 'OR'. The inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed articles within the last 5 years and preferred studies using robust methodology, for example, longitudinal design, RCT, etc., and systematic review. Studies that do not consider the elderly are not written in English, and trials in which the results were excluded for various reasons were used as exclusion criteria. The challenging task was the search itself, in that an overwhelming amount of COVID-19-related studies needed to be filtered down to find relevant articles. The search was limited to specific mental health outcomes to address these challenges, and filters were applied to advance the database.

Don't compromise on quality. Choose New Assignment Help for 100% original Assignment Help UK that meets your academic goals.

Annotated Sources

Article 1: Murayama, H., Okubo, R. and Tabuchi, T. (2021). Increase in Social Isolation during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Association with Mental Health: Findings from the JACSIS 2020 Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), p.8238. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168238.

• Summary: The purpose of this study is to investigate how the elderly populations in Japan suffer from the consequences brought about by social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis with data from the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS) 2020 on 25,482 participants of 65+ on various dependent variables. The study showed that the pandemic caused 35% of participants to feel lonely and that social isolation was significantly increased. However, it was found that the higher the levels of depression and anxiety, the stronger the association with these feelings. Additionally, the study found that elderly people who were alone or with few social ties were prone to mental health decay.
• Evaluation: As with any study, its strength is its large sample size and timely focus on the COVID-19 pandemic, which allows valuable insights to be drawn on the exacerbation of social isolation from public health measures. This does, however, draw a line on causality between social isolation and mental health outcomes as it is a cross-sectional design. More robust evidence of these relationships could come from a longitudinal study. Furthermore, concern regarding the generalizability of the findings to other cultural contexts is also represented in the focus of the survey of Japan.
• Reflection: The key message from this study is that social isolation must become a public health priority to address as the world faces increased social isolation challenges like the one brought upon by the pandemic of COVID 19. The findings show that elderly individuals who live alone or with few close connections should be the target of targeted interventions. By conducting this research, I have learned more about the acute mental health challenges, such as forced isolation, to which the elderly are prone.

Article 2: Smith, K.J. and Victor, C. (2018). Typologies of loneliness, living alone and social isolation, and their associations with physical and mental health. Ageing and Society, [online] 39(8), pp.1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x18000132.

• Summary: This study examines how loneliness in terms of different typologies, whether living alone or socially isolated, is linked to the poor physical and mental health of the elderly. The authors defined four typologies using data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA): resilient, moderate, lonely, and isolated. The findings found that people in the ‘lonely’ and ‘isolated’ groups had much poorer health outcomes for their minds compared to the ‘resilient’ group. The study also discovered that the same did not follow that living alone meant terrible mental health, but you had to add feelings of loneliness or social isolation.
• Evaluation: The study's strength is the use of a large nationally representative dataset combined with a sophisticated way of categorizing loneliness and social isolation. Distinct typologies allow a more complete understanding of the factors that contribute to the mental health outcomes of the elderly. While there is potential bias due to the use of self-reported data, and all researchers can do is look at what is and cannot infer causality, the cross-sectional study design does not allow for that. A temporal perspective on these variables may provide deeper information about the relationships between these variables.
• Reflection:It has brought to light the workings of how living arrangements, loneliness and social isolation work on one another in co-determining mental health outcomes of people. It dispels the thing that it assumes being alone causes mental health issues and works to focus on helping people feel lonely. I have also, with this study, expanded my view of why elderly people need personalised interventions in this specific case following their diverse experiences.

Article 3: Newman, M.G. and Zainal, N.H. (2020). The value of maintaining social connections for mental health in older people. The Lancet Public Health, 5(1), pp.e12–e13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30253-1.

• Summary: This commentary addresses the significance of retaining social contacts to the mental health of older people. A review of existing evidence regarding its protective effects against depression, anxiety, and cognitive decline is discussed by the authors. Supporters argue that so-called social connection interventions, like community programs and even software that fosters it, are essential to significantly improve mental health outcomes in elderly people. The authors also call out policymakers to consider social isolation a public health issue.
• Evaluation: This article is strong because it does an excellent job reviewing what is out there and providing many practical interventions for fighting social isolation. On the one hand, as a commentary, it depends on secondary sources and possibly lessens depth. The article's applicability to low—and middle-income settings might also be limited due to its focus on high-income countries.
• Reflection: This supports the idea that elderly populations tend to be dependent on social connections for positive mental health. This has intrigued the thought of what could and should be done to deal with social isolation, including community-based interventions and technology. The article also suggested that such issues need to be tackled on a multi-sectorial basis concerning healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations.

Literature Review Summary

Social isolation and its effects on the mental health of populations of persons who are elderly remain a high research priority, owing to an ageing world population and a growing incidence of mental health problems in older adults. The three articles reviewed in this article, Murayama et al. (2021), Smith and Victor (2018), and Newman and Zainal (2020), offer significant information for understanding this complicated reference. Together, they show the multiplicity of the condition of social isolation, as well as the impact on mental health, and the importance of timely and focused interventions to minimise it.

Key Themes and Findings

Through the three studies, there is a strong central theme of how social isolation is related to poor mental health outcomes in elderly populations. In their focused work, Murayama et al. (2021) note that elderly participants in Japan experienced a 35 per cent increase in self-reported loneliness, which was correlated with significantly higher levels of depression and anxiety. The provided evidence shows the acute mental health problems that remain for older people during isolation periods, especially during periods of enforced isolation (lockdown or social distancing). This indicates that the most prone to vulnerability are those who live alone or in a limited social network, and they need targeted support when a public health crisis, such as a fire of the kind that happened in this case, occurs. In other words, Smith and Victor (2018) present a more elaborate picture of loneliness and social isolation, which helps segment the two into richer descriptions. Based on their study, elderly individuals are categorised into four groups: resilient, moderate, lonely, and isolated. Those in the poorer "lonely" group and the worse "isolated" group were much more likely compared to the "resilient" group to suffer from depression and anxiety.

Confirming these findings, Newman and Zainal (2020) also add that social connections protect against mental problems. They comment on available evidence on the benefits of social engagement, including less depression, anxiety, and cognitive decline. The authors present that exposing elderly populations to social connections through programs, peer support groups, and technology-based solutions can significantly improve their mental health. They also recommend a multi-sectoral approach of healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organisations to address social isolation as a public health issue.

Methodologies and Quality of Evidence

The studies done in these studies differ in how they take place, reflecting the different ways social isolation and mental health are researched. Regarding empirical evidence, Murayama et al. (2021) and Smith and Victor (2018) employ quantitative analyses of massive, firm, and solid datasets. Data from the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS) 2020, enrolling over 25,000 respondents aged 65 and older, is used by Murayama et al. (2021). The study's large sample size and timely focus on the COVID-19 pandemic enhance its relevance and applicability to current public health challenges. Nevertheless, the cross-sectional design does not allow us to infer a causal relationship since it cannot identify whether mental health issues elicit social isolation.

Based on data from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA), a nationally representative data set that provides great potential for the detailed study of various loneliness and social isolation typologies, Smith and Victor (2018) analyse these. Adding depth to the study of how multiple factors influence mental health outcomes, the study uses latent class analysis to identify distinct groups. The study's limitations, such as its cross-sectional nature, prevent the researcher from inferring causal relationships, like Murayama et al. (2021).

On the other hand, Newman and Zainal (2020) use a qualitative approach, reviewing existing literature to argue for the significance of social connections to mental health. While this commentary sheds valuable insights and gives useful recommendations, it lacks original data and uses secondary sources that may not result in a deep and rigorous analysis. However, the article addresses interventions and policy implications by bridging the gap between research and policy.

Implications for Practice

These findings have significant consequences for health and social care practice. Murayama et al. (2021) support the existence of targeted interventions, particularly during public health crises such as COVID-19, to help elderly individuals. The study also highlights the need to address the unique concerns of the elderly, especially those living alone or with low social networks. Policy and healthcare providers should pay close attention to these groups when fighting against social isolation.

For instance, Smith and Victor (2018) emphasise the need for improving personalised interventions based on the experienced diversity within the elderly. The findings indicate that interventions should aim to reduce feelings of loneliness more than increase social contact. Finally, the study points out the potential advantages of resilience-building intervention for the elderly to cope with living alone or in social isolation.

Newman and Zainal (2020) recommend a multi-sectoral solution that includes health providers, policymakers and community organisations. Instead, they urge that community-based programs like senior centres and peer-based support groups may have the potential to support social contact and help reduce the impact of poor mental health. Finally, the authors point to the possibility of using technology-based solutions like social media platforms and video conferencing tools to extend elderly people to their families and communities.

Gaps in the Literature and Areas for Future Research

First, we reviewed studies, but there are still gaps in the literature. There is a further need for more longitudinal research to establish the causal relationships between social isolation and mental health outcomes. Investigating such relationships through cross-sectional studies, such as those by Murayama et al. (2021) and Smith and Victor (2018), is crucial but does not allow answering whether social isolation causes or happens along with mental health issues. These relationships could be clarified longitudinally to develop more efficient interventions.

First, the literature is generally limited to high-income countries, and very little attention is paid to low and middle-income settings. In such contexts, elderly populations may face greater social isolation due to their lack of assets like access to healthcare, their poverty, and the generally weaker social safety nets (Seyfzadeh et al., 2019). Future research should determine the extent to which social isolation shapes behaviour among the elderly in these settings and test social isolation interventions that are culturally and socioeconomically appropriate.

Lastly, there is a need for more studies on the use of technology to fight the social isolation of elderly populations. Newman and Zainal (2020) spotlight the application of technology-based solutions, but there is limited evidence on implementation and effectiveness in promoting therapeutics for older adults. Future studies should investigate how technology can assist in creating social connections and raise mental health outcomes, in contrast to impediments of digital literacy and the possession of devices.

Conclusion

Finally, the reviewed literature shows the significant influence that social isolation has had on mental health among the elderly. Relevant findings signify the urging for social isolation, particularly among vulnerable populations, including sole dwellers and individuals with constrained social networks. However, the studies help outline what needs to take place to achieve social connection and identify what interventions should be in place to accomplish this; however, more studies are required to demonstrate causality, evaluate the efficacy of interventions in varied environments, and examine the magnitude of technology’s role in spreading social connections. Social isolation not only affects individuals but also represents a public health imperative, and such efforts in addressing social isolation is not the responsibility of the individual but also require the conjoined effort of healthcare providers, policymakers and communities. Thus, by stressing this issue, we can increase the quality of life and fight the poor mental health of the elderly population worldwide.

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has made us realise how fragile social connections are for elderly individuals and how social isolation becomes an issue for them. Because societies are becoming older, social isolation will likely occur more often, so proactive strategies will be required to combat its effects. Therefore, community-based programs such as senior centres and peer support groups are promising avenues to network for social connections and decrease feelings of loneliness. Furthermore, technology-based solutions, including social media platforms and video conferencing tools, can allow such elderly people to bridge the gap between their family and their communities.

References

• Drageset, J. (2021). Social Support. [online] PubMed. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK585650/ [Accessed 20 Mar. 2025].
• Edwards, D. and Best, S. (2020). The Textbook of Health and Social Care. London: SAGE.
• Murayama, H., Okubo, R. and Tabuchi, T. (2021). Increase in Social Isolation during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Association with Mental Health: Findings from the JACSIS 2020 Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 18(16), p.8238. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168238.
• Newman, M.G. and Zainal, N.H. (2020). The value of maintaining social connections for mental health in older people. The Lancet Public Health, [online] 5(1), pp.e12–e13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30253-1.
• Seyfzadeh , A., HAGHIGHATIAN, M. and MOHAJERANI, A. (2019). Social Isolation in the Elderly: The Neglected Issue. Iranian Journal of Public Health, [online] 48(2), p.365. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6556198/ [Accessed 20 Mar. 2025].
• Smith, K.J. and Victor, C. (2018). Typologies of loneliness, living alone and social isolation, and their associations with physical and mental health. Ageing and Society, [online] 39(8), pp.1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x18000132.