9 Pages
2314Words
Introduction Of The Safeguarding Protection And Welfare In Health Care Assignment
Get reliable assignment help online in the UK with New Assignment Help. Our platform offers convenient access to expert assistance, ensuring timely delivery and top-notch quality.
The safeguarding protection and welfare in health care have experienced significant implications. The safeguard development for patients as well as for practitioners is highlighted to provide greater organizational performance. This document accounted for a major description and evaluation of the "lines of reporting and responsibilities”, “boundaries of confidentiality”, and “role and responsibilities of care practitioners” about safeguarding and welfare.
Reporting and responsibility in association with safeguard protection and welfare
Safeguards regarding the reporting procedure and responsibilities of organizational persons are well distributed. The importance of evaluating appropriate reporting lines and responsibilities within the healthcare sectors is being induced with policy development. Therefore, the administrative body of the organization is involved in creating such protocols and principles about the services. According to Artz et al. (2018), the social and healthcare sectors frequently report safeguarding issues. Protecting a child with safeguards is traced to reducing harm and abuse. However, the description of the reporting lines and responsibilities has been asserted as the key way to deliver issues to the responsible department. Reporting to a particular and responsible person in concern is the optimal way to provide effective safeguards. Child abuse cases are a common and relevant example of systematic reporting. As stated by Heath-Kelly and Strausz (2019), the first line of reporting is proceeding with collecting the information. The issue and problem should be listened to carefully for the final report. Therefore, abuse is the most relevant and frequently occurring cause of reports. Information collection is typically followed by the reassurance of no sudden danger and harm. Moreover, the collected information and data are required to place on the line manager (reengage, 2022). The evidence and significance of the report are inevitably conveyed to the line manager. However, in case of the absence of a line manager, the organization has an alternative. The safeguarding officer of the organization becomes the prime responsible person to report. The safeguarding officer is deciding the further procedure for taking action.
The lines of communication for reporting an issue must be reported with written documents. In some cases, external authorities and agencies are hired to monitor the safeguarding issues of the organization. According to Busher et al. (2019), straight to policy development and acceptance in the organization, the reluctant behavior of the staff is required to be safeguarded. The reporting of issues in an organization is referred to following major steps systematically. The written document must contain the date and signed note about the experimental observation. As suggested by Jack et al. (2021), the reporting must be completed by a special person who has training and knowledge about the safeguards, especially a safeguarding officer. Moreover, in stating an example about child abuse, the line of reporting is going to be followed as making written notes and recording information with the date, time and person involved. In the next step, inform the responsible safeguarding officer or line manager at the earliest. Finally, the line manager or safeguard manager according to case evaluation and issues investigation mainly makes the decision.
Boundaries of confidentiality in case of the safeguard, protection and welfare of individual
The sharing of information in an appropriate way is the most valuable process for maintaining confidentiality. The importance of confidentiality in the case of reporting is relevant. Information and data are only supposed to be shared with the responsible person or in charge. According to Arnetz et al. (2020), confidentiality is somewhat confused with a secret. Hence, confidentiality is the protection and transmission of information to an individual who is in need and only has the right to know. Similarly to this, confidentiality is limited by authority. Confidentiality information is required to be protected with the major concern of the responsible person. Therefore, the common information from an organization considered confidential such as health status, weight, height, blood, urine, legal, financial, and personal relationship-related information, are confidential (Dur, 2022). Moreover, confidentiality seems to be destroyed by several causes.
The confidentiality of an organization is similarly broken with the breaching of confidentiality. According to Pujol et al. (2020), organizations and responsible persons must know the need when making decisions about major issues and information transmission. The consequences of delivering soft information to random people or generalized groups further developed risk and threat for vulnerable groups in concern. Therefore, the first and foremost boundary of confidentiality is measured with a "need-to-know basis". For example, the health-related information of an individual requires high security and authenticity of the information. Safety and security during an emergency are vital to be delivered to an authorized person. Thus, the information delivery should follow the strong connection and need approach. Moreover, “gaining consent” is another boundary of confidentiality.
The patient progress report and medicines-related information are only shared with legally available and responsible persons. In the case of a patient with a routine medication and treatment process, confidentiality is crucial. The consent of rights is a valuable right in the case of safeguarding and welfare. The intervention changes and treatment changes are the most significant elements of concern. As stated by Burr et al. (2020), the new innovation of psychometric development in health care services development, digital psychiatry, is an innovative idea. Thus, the implication on the patient is solely performed with gained consent. Apart from gaining consent, the inappropriate disclosure of the information is a relevant boundary of confidentiality. According to Keshta and Odeh (2021), the digital health-related information of the patient is significantly provided to particularly responsible persons. In the case of patient care, the information about treatment and intervention is only allowed to be shared with those who are in need. The friends and other familial persons are not adequate lines to get the information. Henceforth. Sharing information with others requires to have first-hand consent from the particular person. Moreover asserted, all boundaries are relevantly associated with confidentiality aspect.
Role and responsibilities of social and health care practitioners in association safeguard of individual
The social care and healthcare providers in the healthcare sectors are significantly involved with differentiated responsibilities and roles. Therefore, the safeguarding process in the organization by the partition is designed with major rules and regulations. Henceforth, the safeguard of the individual is addressed by incorporating several responsibilities. All the responsibilities and roles are accounted for, ensuring everyone is responsible for developing safeguarding. As stated by Chen and Huang (2020), health care regulations and protocols are meant to be imposed to reinforce healthcare workers' safety. However, the roles and responsibilities of the practitioner are demonstrated by placing care for the person with uttermost priority. The responsibilities and roles of practitioners and social care providers are differentiated from each other. Thus, the main goal of their service is to follow some common elements in the application. However, putting care for a person at the centre seems to be a relevant process to providing vital care to the person.
The social care worker and health care practitioners are responsible for delivering safety to the patient's side. In response to the care and safeguarding of individuals, the practitioners seem to provide high monitoring interaction for the patient. Therefore, the monitoring and interaction elements within the service delivery it is essential to promote the mistreatment of the patient (Assets, 2022). The importance of practitioners' monitoring of patients is being addressed as the most appropriate way to promote the best service outcomes. Thus, safeguarding everyone without any external influences can be promoted as the greatest way to provide authentic and safest services. According to Artz et al. (2018), in the case of the healthcare sector, services delivered by the practitioners are regulated by legal and organizational guidelines. Moreover, in providing safeguarding to individuals, it is required to be followed promptly. The role of the practitioner is carried out by responding to the incidents. Therefore, in child abuse cases and patient care, the wrong intervention can be reduced by effectively monitoring interaction procedures in an organization. The services and charges are further depicted in the investigation. The resultant nature of services and actions practitioners take is identified with developing the issue's resolution. The functional element of the organization should follow the particular advantages of using this role and responsibilities.
Conclusion
The safeguarding, protection and welfare are being addressed with a most important element of organization to follow. The overall evaluation and description of safeguarding and welfare have asserted that the line of reporting must follow first and initial reporting to the line manager or safeguard officer. Therefore, the boundaries of confidentiality are addressed with "gaining consent", “Need to know", and "inappropriate disclosure of information". Moreover, this document has concluded that the role and responsibilities of practitioners are implemented to provide safeguards for individuals. Monitoring interaction, safety assurance, responding to incidents and providing the best care delivered for the person are major responsibilities of practitioners of health care and social care.
References
Arnetz, J.E., Goetz, C.M., Arnetz, B.B. and Arble, E., 2020. Nurse reports of stressful situations during the COVID-19 pandemic: Qualitative analysis of survey responses. International journal of Environmental Research and public health, 17(21), p.8126.
Artz, L., Meer, T. and Aschman, G., 2018. Legal duties, professional obligations or notional guidelines? Screening, treatment and referral of domestic violence cases in primary health care settings in South Africa. African journal of primary health care and family medicine, 10(1), pp.1-7.
Burr, C., Morley, J., Taddeo, M. and Floridi, L., 2020. Digital psychiatry: Risks and opportunities for public health and wellbeing. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 1(1), pp.21-33.
Busher, J., Choudhury, T. and Thomas, P., 2019. The enactment of the counter-terrorism “Prevent duty” in British schools and colleges: Beyond reluctant accommodation or straightforward policy acceptance. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 12(3), pp.440-462.
Chen, W. and Huang, Y., 2020. To protect health care workers better, to save more lives with COVID-19. Anesthesia and Analgesia.
Heath-Kelly, C. and Strausz, E., 2019. The banality of counterterrorism “after, after 9/11”? Perspectives on the Prevent duty from the UK health care sector. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 12(1), pp.89-109.
Jack, S.M., Gonzalez, A., Marcellus, L., Tonmyr, L., Varcoe, C., Van Borek, N., Sheehan, D., MacKinnon, K., Campbell, K., Catherine, N. and Kurtz Landy, C., 2021. Public health nurses’ professional practices to prevent, recognize, and respond to suspected child maltreatment in home visiting: An interpretive descriptive study. Global qualitative nursing research, 8, p.2333393621993450.
Keshta, I. and Odeh, A., 2021. Security and privacy of electronic health records: Concerns and challenges. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 22(2), pp.177-183.
Pujol, D., McKenna, R., Kuppam, S., Hay, M., Machanavajjhala, A. and Miklau, G., 2020, January. Fair decision-making using privacy-protected data. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 189-199).
Websites
Assets, 2022. Working Together to Safeguard Children A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of Children. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/942454/Working_together_to_safeguard_children_inter_agency_guidance.pdf[accessed on 24 September 2022]
Dur, 2022. Process for reporting safeguarding concerns. Available at: https://www.dur.ac.uk/safeguarding/guidance/process/ [accessed on 24 September 2022]
Reengage, 2022. In summary: what are your responsibilities in relation to safeguarding? Available at: https://www.reengage.org.uk/volunteer/resources/training/core-training/introduction-to-safeguarding/what-are-your-responsibilities-in-relation-to-safeguarding/[accessed on 24 September 2022]
Bibliography
Alexandrou, A. and Chen, L.C., 2019. A security risk perception model for the adoption of mobile devices in the healthcare industry. Security Journal, 32(4), pp.410-434.
Barrett, C.L., 2020. Primary healthcare practitioners and patient blood management in Africa in the time of coronavirus disease 2019: Safeguarding the blood supply. African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine, 12(1), pp.1-3.
Fan, M., Tscheng, D., Hamilton, M., Hyland, B., Reding, R. and Trbovich, P., 2019. Diversion of controlled drugs in hospitals: a scoping review of contributors and safeguards. Journal of hospital medicine, 14(7), pp.419-428.
Faulkner, A., Carr, S., Gould, D., Khisa, C., Hafford?Letchfield, T., Cohen, R., Megele, C. and Holley, J., 2021. ‘Dignity and respect’: An example of service user leadership and co?production in mental health research. Health Expectations, 24, pp.10-19.
Paul, A.K. and Schaefer, M., 2020. Safeguards for the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning in global health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 98(4), p.282.
Peckover, S. and Appleton, J.V., 2019. Health visiting and safeguarding children: A perfect storm?. Journal of Health Visiting, 7(5), pp.232-238.
Shaw, S.C., 2020. Hopelessness, helplessness and resilience: The importance of safeguarding our trainees' mental wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurse education in practice, 44, p.102780.
Sud, S.R., 2020. COVID-19 and keeping clean: a narrative review to ascertain the efficacy of personal protective equipment to safeguard health care workers against SARS-CoV-2. Hospital Pediatrics, 10(7), pp.570-576.
