10 Pages
2550 Words
Introduction of BMP3003 Academic integrity in workplace Assignment
Get free written samples by our Top-Notch subject experts and Online Assignment Help.
Academic integrity is frequently referred to as work ethics or values in the workplace. Academic ethics is described as putting on the table all of the principles and facts that institutions and education organisations stand for, such as labour duties. Excellence, sincerity, and the provision of high-quality work that can be defended to the others. The purpose of this report is to discuss academic honesty. The report explains academic ethics, its concept, and the five pillars of academic integrity. This study discusses the university's or school's role in developing learners' experiences and why academic integrity is so crucial in the higher education system. There is also a discussion of the consequences of academic misconduct in this study.
A brief introduction that includes an explanation of academic integrity
Perfection in attaining a result, obligations regarding work as well as other individuals, sincerity in employment or with other individuals, equality among all, and empathy for people and their effort are the qualities that make up academic honesty at any college. Academic honesty can help a student improve the accuracy and uniqueness over his or her performance. In the context of a university, a person can be a learner, a professor, a person within the organisation, and every other member of the college's academic community. Academic ethics is necessary because it permits institutions of higher learning to develop new and innovative ideas Waghid et al..,(2019). It also assures that the job done by the students, researchers, and instructors is their labour, with their minds used to make it creative and unique from everybody else. Academic ethics is essential at universities and educational organisations because it keeps a standardised balance for everyone in the organisation, including students, researchers, teaching assistants, and others, in terms of maintaining equality and giving everyone an equal opportunity to work and shine Fatemi et al..,(2020). Working with honesty, establishing their own distinct terms and techniques, and treating everyone with dignity. As a college student, it excites and educates you about your duties to the trade and others (clients or researchers, teachers, and employees) Bretag et al..,(2016). In higher learning organisations, specific work responsibility refers to a person's personal accountability to implement their excellent efforts, using new inventions and their own talents and competencies.
University and school responsibilities
In order to prevent plagiarism while providing and responding to the reputation of your institution Keizer et al..,(2020). By creating a unique and proper type of research that supports effectively everyone and anyone who refers to it and appreciates it, and by attempting to keep it fair for others by offering everyone a chance to demonstrate and learn from it.
To better comprehend, study, and thrive, institutions operate on the assumption of academic integrity ideals to ensure accuracy, duties link with the university,fairness of opportunities and instruction, friendly surroundings, and honesty toward job and other people. Academic integrity allows higher education institutions to operate at their best, resulting in greater positive benefits on academics and professionals, including professors Ye et al..,(2021). It differs according to what people did in class or at a ground position, such as learning and copy-pasting concepts and concepts after learning them from one source and putting together assignments and projects without recognising them Weiss et al..,(2018). It's a wonderful thing to acknowledge anyone when they use their concept or approach to work since it demonstrates that you're truthful, equitable, accountable, and respectful of others.
Importance of higher education's academic integrity system
Academic ethics allows lecturers and learners to represent themselves creatively, informationally, and artistically while simultaneously valuing and honouring the work of everyone else. The Institution shall deal with examination malpractices in a reasonable, comprehensive, approachable, and productive way. Holden et al..,(2020). In terms of bringing up new benefits and risks, rapid technological progress has both harmed and benefited higher education. Because of the internet and other electronic means, higher education has become more cheap and available. This innovation now has a positive impact, but it also allows for the possibility, risks, and challenges that have a significant effect on the development of higher education. The most serious challenge is retaining academic honesty.Quality is an essential feature that distinguishes a community, because it must be at the heart of the organisation's values and beliefs. Plagiarism is a problem in university education since it attracts a huge number of students Mahabeer et al..,(2019). Legislators, government agencies, parents, caregivers, and employers, and also academics, investigators, and CEOs, are all committed to the highest standards of morality. In reality, issues with honesty or professional dishonesty have been recorded at every institution in every country, from the highest possible level to the lowest.
Academic integrity is critical in higher education, institutions, and organisations when reckless behaviour undermines learners' academic achievement and image. Outstanding educational integrity is required to protect an institution's or university's image, contribute in successful functionality by maintaining integrity, and contribute to society's well-being. Academic dishonesty erodes the college's and individuals' confidence in higher education. A bachelor is a college participant who is supposed to maintain a higher level of decency for the institution and its traditions Landa-Blanco et al..,(2020). The usage of these tasks indefinitely maintains abilities and encourages public awareness of intellectual qualities. Graduate studies, research, teaching, and research all demand academic honesty. Professors and students can develop new ideas, talents, and artistic works while also understanding and acknowledging other worksheets and providing appropriate validity without copying and pasting. Academic integrity demands the upkeep of a network of service university norms and responsibilities. To ensure academic quality, the Institution must adhere to a high quality of teaching while simultaneously acknowledging the importance of supporting learners to gain and demonstrating understanding of the subject.
Mental health is a key measure of an institution's ability to retain its quality. For either productivity expansion or wellbeing, undergrad learning is an essential nation-building organisation. As a result of modern media marketing and the usage of the internet, honesty has become a challenge, which seems to have an influence on the moral and essential organisation Stoesz et al..,(2020). There has also been a significant quantity of studies regarding freedom, but no comprehensive study on the influence of misconduct on an organisation or culture. Any institution must respond with academic cheating fairly, systematically, openly, and promptly. In line with its preservation and information appropriate alternative, a college must ensure that repositories of inquiries and discoveries are tightly controlled and kept private. In addition, an institution must keep a continual quality control process to discover and rectify the primary reasons of stress and academic performance, and even the type of the incidents Richards et al..,(2016). In the case of any type of disobedience, an institution should take steps to guarantee that the intellectual honesty of any collaborative colleague is protected in the circumstances.
Pillars of academic integrity
Academic honesty is the cornerstone of the organisation's mission to facilitate the interchange of ideas and the production of new knowledge, and it needs a spirit of cooperation among scholars and experts Lindstrom et al (2022). Academic ethics is commonly cited as a technique of avoiding immoral or unlawful behaviour in the classroom. When the concentration is on problematic actions and a lack of credibility, debates about truthfulness are more about suspicion than confidence, regard, and growth.
Pillar 1 (Honesty)
Honesty is synonymous with truthfulness. The pillars of academic standards are all formed on the basis of truth. People who are truthful judge their own abilities and appropriately reflect their accomplishments.
Pillar 2 ( Trust)
When people genuinely believe in other members of the public, it is simpler to make relationships. Brown et al (2017). In a culture and everyone is doing their excellent efforts, programs and practices are unbiased, and everyone else is treated equally, interactions that take place.
Pillar 3 (Fairness)
Justice and trustworthiness are inextricably linked. Everyone here in the community should have the expectation that they will be respected and protected, and that they will be examined on the very same level as others. For example, you can believe that your professors would evaluate all workload fairly and would not privilege one learner above another Soskolne et al (2016). The best results come from a good framework.
Pillar 4 (Respect)
Different perspectives and opinions can be communicated in a respectful manner. Learners show respect through hearing diverse perspectives, being prepared, keeping obligations, and attaining the greatest attainable level. Professors who respond to students' ideas and to provide comprehensive and honest feedback display regard.
Pillar 5 (Responsibility)
Dedication means acknowledging power and duties in everyday activities in order to achieve. Everyone will have a significant involvement in taking precautions in the workplace and pushing everyone to do so. Individuals who are dedicated to academic standards have a beneficial effect on the organisation as a whole.
Implications of academic misconduct
Any unfair behaviour in writing assignments and assessments is referred to as examination malpractices. Any effort being made against, seeks to get, or supports others in obtaining or seeking to gain educational benefits through fraud is classified as educational inappropriate behaviour Parnther et al..,(2020). Occupational misconduct includes copyright infringement, collusion, collective bargaining agreement scamming, data fabrication, and the availability of forbidden medications during an examination.
Following is a review of the obligations and how they should observe the guidelines and laws, as well as how they should influence their performance to prevent committing or performing unlawful activity. Depending upon the severity of the violation, if a learner chooses to get around the limitation, he because they may be prosecuted with academic dishonesty. Academic misbehaviour can culminate in a student's removal from college or banishment from the premises Velliaris et al..,(2016). A candidate who engages in substantial misbehaviour may be required to retake an assessment, incur a mark decrease, or be excluded from the program where the inaccuracy was revealed. Due to the severity and conduct of the student, the person who is responsible may have the right to reject a teenager for resistance in a particular framework or the group of students.
The administrator may make a petition complaint against the offender with the administration of the academic organisation. Managers must send a letter to the university council's office explaining the child's illegal practices in the assigned assignment. The student body president maintains a record of each student ’s educational development in addition to their educational achievements. The student seems to have the option of answering to the correspondence with an apology, justifications, or any other opinion on the matter after the document has been sent and the complaint has already been formally lodged Patrzek et al..,(2015). These elements can be obtained and added towards the individual's report. The student may also demand a greater session well before relevant authority. Supervisors also have the possibility of making a legal complaint with both the authorised person. If someone is a member of the higher education institution is liable to be punished, which is conducted by the institution's adjudicating authority. They have a judicial inquiry during which they examine past instances against this kind of individual both from both sides and determine the appropriate penalties for a student who has committed assessment bad practices Djokovic et al..,(2022). The member may be refused entry to the program's copyrighted content, and also any notoriety obtained from the results of the activity. There have also been instances where the supervisor or other relevant parties have enforced legal consequences on the criminal, such as imprisonment, a judge's ruling, a punishment, and etc.
References
Bretag, T. ed., 2016. Handbook of academic integrity. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Brown, N. and Janssen, R., 2017. Preventing plagiarism and fostering academic integrity: a practical approach. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 5(3), pp.102-109.
Djokovic, R., Janinovic, J., Pekovic, S., Vuckovic, D. and Blecic, M., 2022. Relying on Technology for Countering Academic Dishonesty: The Impact of Online Tutorial on Students’ Perception of Academic Misconduct. Sustainability, 14(3), p.1756.
Fatemi, G. and Saito, E., 2020. Unintentional plagiarism and academic integrity: The challenges and needs of postgraduate international students in Australia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(10), pp.1305-1319.
Holden, O., Kuhlmeier, V.A. and Norris, M., 2020. Academic integrity in online testing: a research review.
Keizer, R., van Lissa, C.J., Tiemeier, H. and Lucassen, N., 2020. The influence of fathers and mothers equally sharing childcare responsibilities on children’s cognitive development from early childhood to school age: An overlooked mechanism in the intergenerational transmission of (dis) advantages?. European Sociological Review, 36(1), pp.1-15.
Landa-Blanco, M., Santos-Midence, C. and Blanco, A.L., 2020. Academic integrity: attitudes and practices of students of a public university in Honduras. Academia, (20-21), pp.202-217.
Lindstrom, G.E., 2022. Accountability, relationality and Indigenous epistemology: Advancing an Indigenous perspective on academic integrity. In Academic Integrity in Canada (pp. 125-139). Springer, Cham.
Mahabeer, P. and Pirtheepal, T., 2019. Assessment, plagiarism and its effect on academic integrity: Experiences of academics at a university in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 115(11-12), pp.1-8.
Parnther, C., 2020. Academic misconduct in higher education: A comprehensive review. Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies, 1(1), pp.25-45.
Patrzek, J., Sattler, S., van Veen, F., Grunschel, C. and Fries, S., 2015. Investigating the effect of academic procrastination on the frequency and variety of academic misconduct: a panel study. Studies in Higher Education, 40(6), pp.1014-1029.
Richards, D., Saddiqui, S., White, F., McGuigan, N. and Homewood, J., 2016. A theory of change for student-led academic integrity. Quality in higher education, 22(3), pp.242-259.
Soskolne, C.L., 2016. A pillar of academic and research excellence: the enduring influence of mentorship in science: legacy. South African Medical Journal, 106(sup-1), pp.12-13.
Stoesz, B.M. and Eaton, S.E., 2020. Academic integrity policies of publicly funded universities in western Canada. Educational Policy, p.0895904820983032.
Velliaris, D.M. ed., 2016. Handbook of research on academic misconduct in higher education. IGI Global.
Waghid, Y. and Davids, N., 2019. On the polemic of academic integrity in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(1), pp.1-5.
Weiss, G., Templeton, N., Thompson, R. and Tremont, J.W., 2018. Superintendent and school board relations: Impacting achievement through collaborative understanding of roles and responsibilities. School Leadership Review, 9(2), p.4.
Ye, Y. and Li, K., 2021. Impact of family involvement on internal and external corporate social responsibilities: Evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), pp.352-365.
