Critically Evaluating Child Protection: Causes & Consequences of Abuse Assignment Sample

Introduction - UK Child Protection Reforms: Key Cases & Systemic Gaps

One of the most important and delicate areas of social support is child protection, which needs constant advancement in its legal and policy platforms. This task will consider the complex child protection pathway in the UK, describing how different factors have created and reformed it throughout history. This topic is of great importance for society; it reflects the moral and ethical status and commitment to the security or welfare of citizens who are vulnerable members. The task is intended to address learning outcomes 1 and 2, serving the purpose of a critical discussion on the child protection process. It aims to analyze the forces behind these frequent changes in legislation and policy guidance. To address these questions, the assignment will take a historical approach to follow how child protection evolved from an essentially non-existent concept to nowadays dominating social policy and legal norms.

Critically evaluate the process of protecting the child and incorporate a critical analysis of the causes and consequences of child abuse.

Historical Context and Early Legislation

The development of UK child protection law is a long and complicated process, which started in the era where those notions did not exist practically at all. The UK of the 18th century lacked effective child protection laws (John, 2006). The focus in society was rapidly altered compared to the previous period, with more attention apparently being given to animal welfare than children.

The development of child protection started gaining momentum in the late 19th century. The first local Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children were formed in Liverpool in 1883 (Nationalarchives.gov.uk, 1883). These cultures played a fundamental role in creating awareness around the issue of child abuse. In 1889 the momentous ‘Children’s Charter Act’, which was a law that could operate between parents and their children came into effect (Walsh, 2020). With this act, police could arrest any person who maltreats a child or enter the house if someone believed that there was a danger to the child.

The early 20th century also had other developments concerning child welfare, as societies could now concentrate on the physical health of children (Gordon, 2011). Problems such as medical malpractice, diseases like rickets and TB, and undernourishment became subjects of interest for reformers. This resulted in the introduction of such measures as school meals, free milk and medical care for children. Nevertheless, despite such progress, several terrible cases in the 20th century brought to evidence the insufficiency of the child protection system (Walsh, 2020). The death of the five-year-old Maria Colwell in 1973 who despite being under local authority protection was murdered by her stepfather attracted national attention to failures in child prophylaxis. This tragic disaster was followed by other high-profile cases like that of Jasmine Beckford, Heidi Kosea and Tyra Henry who further highlighted in the need to enhance the child protection system (Crane, 2018).

By the end of 20 th century, it was no longer narrowed down to physical abuse but also emotional-psychological and sexual abuse. Child protection services were subjected to scrutiny in public after the scandals that took place sometime between the late 1980s and early 1945 involving cases where parental sex abuse was alleged.

The Children Act that was passed in 1948 is also an important landmark following the death of a thirteen-year old Dennis O’Neill in 1945 (Theguardian, 2005). It emphasized on the children who were under state care away from their homes where a committee of Children was created in every local authority, one thing that would take charge for these kids. All these historical contexts are the basis for ongoing reform and keep changing child protection legislation and approaches in Great Britain (Theguardian, 2005). The evolution in children welfare legislation from no early imposition to the development of comprehensive child protection laws reflects an increasing socie ethic consciousness about protecting and safeguarding their wellbeing.

Landmark Cases and Public Outcry

The cases of Victoria Climbié and Baby P represent two crucial points in the history of child protection as a response to public outrage, which underwent major changes that took place on both policy and legislative.

The case of Victoria Climbié, in particular, brought about a huge change. The sad death of Victoria Climbie in 2001 was a resultant signposting of the serious oversights that had occurred along her child protection journey (Batty, 2003). The investigation into her death by Lord Laming revealed other areas where this could have been possible and identified systemic failures in various organizations involved in the treatment of Victoria. This incident motivated the Every Child Matters initiative, the Children Act 2004 and the Office of the Children’s Commissioner in England (Education-uk, 2021). It also played a role in changing social care practices and strengthening the multi-agency working, better communications between agencies as well as enhancement of training and awareness among professionals responsible for child protection.

However, the child protection system also received additional attention after Baby P’s death in 2007. Just like Climbié, Baby P was also watched by the Haringey Council when she died from long-term injuries. His death was met with a lot of reaction from both the public and media mostly focused on social services (Education-uk, 2021). The case sparked ‘the Baby P effect’, resulting in the increased number of care order applications and eventually led to the first Public Law Outline intended for hastening care proceedings implementation. It also led to a review and major reform in the child protection practices. Appointed in 2010, the Munro Report examined issues facing the child protection system in England and Wales including improvement recommendations on its state (Munro, 2022). It focused on the need to pay more attention not only to compliance with procedures but also to the quality and effectiveness of support given for children.

These cases and responses to them indicate that the question of effective child protection remains a challenge. They show why a system that is not just timely and alert, but one which actively safeguards the interests of children and promotes multi-agency working should be needed (Munro, 2022). The cases discussed above brought reforms and changes to the systems; however, even today people still strive for better child protection mechanisms highlighting a rather complex nature of this field.

Policy and Legislative Response

The Children Act 1989 is a significant legal system in the United Kingdom that emphasizes on welfare and rights of children (Ojp.gov, 2022). Thus, this extensive Act introduced the paramountcy rule that states children’s welfare should be placed in their best interest in any decisions concerning them. This principle was a revolutionary step in the legal approach, leaving no room for children’s needs to be sidelined on issues of legality and care. The idea of ‘parental responsibility’ is an important part of the Act: it was a new way to perceive relations between parents and their children in legal terms (Ojp.gov, 2022). Instead of stressing parental rights, the Act underlines parents’ responsibilities to their children such as providing for their care and protection.

The Act also included several orders related to children, including Child Arrangement Orders determining whether a child lives with whom and has contact along with Specific Issue Orders addressing specific aspects of raising the child (E-justice.europa.eu, 2022). Moreover, it imposed new responsibilities on the local authorities that should create services for children at risk and their families with an emphasis on institutions. The Children Act 2004 built upon the principles of its predecessor, spurred by Victoria Climbié case which brought to light critical weaknesses in child protection (Laming, 2003). This amendment stressed the idea of multi-agency collaboration and introduced positions like Children’s Commissioner, Director of Child Services in local authorities which made child welfare relevant to many spheres.

Get Extra 10% OFF on your WhatsApp order!

use my discount

Victoria Climbié's Case

The case of Victoria Climbié shows what bad things can happen when the systems fail to protect children (Hall, 2003). In 1998, her great-aunt Marie Therese Kouao brought her from the Ivory Coast to live in Europe living firstly in France and then London. While in London, Victoria was exposed to terrible abuse and malnourishment leading to her death on February 2009 at the age of eight years. The abuse was committed by Kouao and her boyfriend, Carl Manning (Brennan and Packer, 2022).

However, despite the fact that she had interactions with various social services such as NSPCC hospitals and police force her level of abuse was not detected. The case exposed glaring loopholes within the child protection system including communication challenges, poor training and failure to respond appropriately on signs of abuse. The public inquiry chaired by Lord Laming concluded that her death was preventable and identified several missed opportunities to save Marie (Laming, 2003). This resulted in major reforms of child protection that came about with the launching of Every Child Matters initiative, Children Act 2004 and Office for the Commissioner children in England.

Baby P (Peter Connolly) Case

In March 2006, Tracey Connelly gave birth to Peter. One year later, Peter experienced unbelievable abuse and neglect that eventually led to his death in August 2007 at only seventeen months of age (Brennan and Packer, 2022). This case revealed massive systemic flaws in the child protection framework and triggered enormous public criticism as well as substantial reforms to child protective policies.

From his death to about 60 times, authorities visited Peter during the eight months leading up he had seen him and yet did not enable him from violence (BBC, 2010). During this period, he incurred more than fifty injuries. Among the vital agencies that participated in his case were social services, police and health care professionals. Despite being listed on the child protection register, attempts to protect him were woefully inadequate.

In June 2007, a social worker spotted Peter’s marks and reported the instance to police after which he was medically examined as being abused from childhood. However, as early as July 31st. The following morning, Peter was examined by a paediatrician who did not notice his gravely injured back and ribs. On 3rd August,2007 Peter was declared dead at the hospital after he had been found unconscious in his cot. Post mortem examination revealed a long list of injuries, for instance, broken back and ribs as well as mutilated fingertips. Legal and systemic responses were quite milk in the wake of Peter’s death (BBC, 2010). The mother, his brother and her boyfriend were convicted of causing or allowing the death of a child. It also resulted in the release of ‘Working Together to Safeguard Children’ guidance in 2010 that was meant at boosting inter-agency approach. Furthermore, the Social Work Taskforce was established by government to improve social worker recruitment training and Supervision.

Current State of Child Protection Policies and Legislation

Examination of the current child protection policies and legislation

In 2019 child protection system in England remains to develop and adjust for new challenges as well as vision of children’s welfare (The Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel, 2022). The bases of this system start with the Children Act 1989, which makes all legal proceedings and decisions concerning children focused on their welfare. It introduced the concept parental responsibility and made duty for local authorities to protect and promote welfare of children in need.

The Children Act 2004 developed these principles significantly, especially in response to high-profile child abuse cases (The Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel, 2022). It provided a responsibility for various bodies such as local authorities, the police and health services to be taken into account on safeguarding protection of children’s welfare in their operations. It also created new arrangements for local safeguarding, where three partners (local authority, NHS Integrated Care Boards and police forces) decide how the framework should operate in their area.

Notably, the Department for Education published a revised manual of its statutory guidance “Working Together to Safeguard Children” in December 2023 (Consult.education.gov.uk, 2022). This edition supersedes the 2018 version and lists what organizations and agencies should do to ensure both protection alongside promotion of welfare for all children or young persons below the age of eighteen years in England. The guidance focuses on multiagency expectations; working with parents and families, safeguarding partner roles clarification, education/ childcare providers’ role ,and harm occurring outside the home.

Secondly, the government has embarked on reforming social care among children whereby there is an emphasis on investing in addressing some of the critical issues affecting children and families as well as laying a foundation for system-wide change (OECD, 2019). In addition, the ‘Families First for Children Pathfinder’ programme is being rolled out in up to 12 local areas in England as a test of new ways of providing child protection and support services (Gov.uk, 2022). As it stands, child protection in England is an ever-evolving system which continues to adapt and develop trends from new insights into effective ways of preserving the wellbeing interests for children.

Discussion on the effectiveness of these policies in protecting children

In the UK, as of 2023, child protection policies and laws operate in a complex environment that involves different interventions focusing on various authorities responsible for ensuring children’s welfare. Evidence shows that there are certain interventions which work to improve outcomes for vulnerable children, though their application is constrained by cost considerations as well as local contexts and resources (OECD, 2019). This demonstrates the gap between effective services that have been proven and their reach to all the families in need. Provision of child welfare is largely associated with responsibilities such as support for children with complex needs and response to concerns raised against child protection. They judge if a child requires immediate safeguarding or is in need according to the Children Act 1989, although challenges are present when instilling such measures in different local settings (Gordon, 2011). In an effort to bridge this gap between evidence and practice, government policies and reforms come into play in that a What Works Centre for Children’s Social Care has been set up with the sole mission of improving the use of evidence in child protection. The UK’s child protection system, strong in its policies and legislation, faces threats regarding resource allocation, grassroots implementation strategies as well as evidence-based practices.

Critique of current gaps or challenges in the system

The UK child protection system, which has an extensive legislative framework, is also faced with a number of challenges that jeopardize the effectiveness. These challenges, arising from resource limitations, implementation differences in patterns and practice-based evidence gaps as well as the complexity of cases are highly complex issues that will take much to be tackled.

Resource Constraints

One of the biggest challenges is a lack of funding for child protection services which gets worsened by budget cuts and fiscal austerity (Lx.iriss.org.uk, 2020). This results in resource strain that affects the availability and quality of services, putting immensely much pressure on social workers and other child protection professionals. When caseloads are too heavy and there is a lack of resources, interventions may be less effective or delayed intervention can put children in jeopardy.

Varied Local Implementation

Geographical variation in the implementation of policy and guidance characterizes child protection system in UK. Such inconsistencies cause unjust service provision where some regions are served better than others, resulting in a postcode lottery on child protection services. Such geographical differences may greatly influence the quality and scope of protection and care that a child receives.

Gaps in Evidence-Based Practice: The child protection system promotes evidence-based interventions, and there is an inconsistency in the application of such evidences across the system. Many widely used interventions lack strong evaluation, which makes their efficacy challenged. Moreover, research findings do not always inform practice quickly leaving much space for the adoption of more efficient approaches to take place.

Challenges in Multi-Agency Collaboration

Child protection requires inter-agency information sharing between social care, healthcare, education and law enforcers (Lx.iriss.org.uk, 2020). Still, difficulties in communication and collaboration between these bodies make it difficult child protection activities, which results in missed opportunities for early intervention and effective services to the young ones.

Rising Complexity of Cases

Belonging to the sphere of child protection cases, their types and specifics are constantly changing in accordance with new challenges like cyber abuse, trafficking or radicalization (katharina.kiener-manu, 2021). Such emerging threats pose a formidable challenge to the system, and professionals require constant training on such issues for it to be effective.

Service Accessibility and Inclusivity

Availability of child protection services that are responsive to the needs of a diverse population is an important aspect. As for the system aimed at maintaining all children’s equality, inclusiveness in service provision is necessary.

Workforce Challenges

Another big challenge with respect to child protection is finding and maintaining a pool of qualified professionals. Issues such as a lot of stress, emotional fatigue and poor remuneration may result to high turnover rates that affect the continuity and quality care.

Recommendation

Initially, Interagency Collaboration and Communication need to be strengthened (Kaiser, 2011). Cases of child protection require constant coordination between social services, healthcare, education and law enforcement agencies. Integrated training programs, regular inter-agency meetings and comprehensive data systems can be used to support improved collaboration. This coordination is crucial in identifying risks early and timely interventions to holistic response for child protection concerns.

Secondly, the Workforce Development and Support of child protection workers is vital (Bekaert et al., 2021). The system primarily depends on these individuals’ expertise, judgment and state of being. Thus, efforts to enhance recruitment and retention like competitive remuneration packages as well as building working environments that support employees coupled with providing professional development together with mental health support are necessary. Good training methods and reasonable caseloads are also necessary to prevent burnout, as it helps achieve high standards of care provision and interventions. The workforce that is supported and empowered can significantly contribute to the improvement of child protection services.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the UK child protection system is underpinned by a thorough legal framework; nonetheless, it still has several challenges that undermine its overall results. These challenges include resource constraints, lack of uniformity at the regional level in implementation structure, deficit in evidence-based practice framework as well difficulties that come with joint efforts across agencies and complex cases. It is holistic response to these challenges that incorporates more funding, development of standardized best practices, consolidation of interagency cooperation; workforce support and focus on prevention approaches. Child protection is not only based on statutes and policies but also their practical harmonization, the quality of labour force as well as public engagement. The child protection should shift as the problems of society do, finding new tactics and techniques to safeguard what is right by every single child in this country.

References

• Batty, D. (2003). Q&A: Victoria Climbié inquiry. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2003/jan/30/1.
• BBC (2010). Baby Peter ‘was failed by all agencies’. BBC News. [online] 25 Oct. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/education-11621391#:~:text=The%2017%2Dmonth%2Dold%20boy [Accessed 27 Jan. 2024].
• Bekaert, S., Paavilainen, E., Schecke, H., Baldacchino, A., Jouet, E., Zab?ocka – ?ytka, L., Bachi, B., Bartoli, F., Carrà, G., Cioni, R.M., Crocamo, C. and Appleton, J.V. (2021). Family members’ perspectives of child protection services, a metasynthesis of the literature. Children and Youth Services Review, [online] 128, p.106094. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106094.
• Brennan, F. and Packer, J. (2022). In Their Own Defence: Violence against girls, and girls as human rights defenders. [online] Available at: https://repository.essex.ac.uk/4551/1/PackerBrennan.pdf [Accessed 27 Jan. 2024].
• Consult.education.gov.uk (2022). Changes to statutory guidance: Working Together to Safeguard Children Government consultation. [online] Available at: https://consult.education.gov.uk/child-protection-safeguarding-division/working-together-to-safeguard-children-changes-to/supporting_documents/Working%20Together%20to%20Safeguard%20Children%202023%20%20consultation%20document.pdf.
• Crane, J. (2018). Hearing Children’s Experiences in Public. [online] www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535580/.
• E-justice.europa.eu (2022). European e-Justice Portal - Parental responsibility - child custody and contact rights. [online] e-justice.europa.eu. Available at: https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_parental_responsibility-302-hr-en.do?member=1 [Accessed 27 Jan. 2024].
• Education-uk (2021). Every Child Matters: Change for Children. [online] Available at: https://education-uk.org/documents/pdfs/2004-ecm-change-for-children.pdf.
• Filip, I., Radfar, A., Asgharzadeh, S.A. and Quesada, F. (2018). Challenges and Perspectives of Child Labor. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, [online] 27(1), p.17. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_105_14.
• Gordon, L. (2011). Child Welfare. [online] Social Welfare History Project. Available at: https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/programs/child-welfarechild-labor/child-welfare-overview/.
• Gov.uk (2022). Families first for children (FFC) pathfinder programme and family networks pilot (FNP). [online] GOV.UK. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/families-first-for-children-ffc-pathfinder-programme/families-first-for-children-ffc-pathfinder-programme-and-family-networks-pilot-fnp.
• Hall, D. (2003). Child protection---lessons from Victoria Climbie. BMJ, [online] 326(7384), pp.293–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7384.293.
• John (2006). Child Protection From the Colonial Period to 1875. Oxford University Press eBooks, [online] pp.11–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169355.003.0001.
• Kaiser, F. (2011). CRS Report for Congress Interagency Collaborative Arrangements and Activities: Types, Rationales, Considerations. [online] Available at: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R41803.pdf.
• katharina.kiener-manu (2021). Cybercrime Module 12 Key Issues: Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse. [online] www.unodc.org. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/e4j/zh/cybercrime/module-12/key-issues/online-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse.html.
• Laming, L. (2003). The Inquiry Victoria Climbie. [online] Gov.UK. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/273183/5730.pdf.
• Lx.iriss.org.uk (2020). PROTECTING CHILDREN -A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY: Guidance on Inter-Agency Co-operation PROTECTING CHILDREN -A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY Guidance on Inter-Agency Co-operation. [online] Available at: https://lx.iriss.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/039.%20Protecting%20Children%20-%20A%20Shared%20Responsibility.%20(Guidance%20on%20IA%20Cooperation).pdf.
• Munro, E. (2022). The Munro Review of Child Protection Part One: A Systems Analysis. [online] Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a81e8a5e5274a2e8ab567a9/TheMunroReview-Part_one.pdf.
• Nationalarchives.gov.uk (1883). Records of the Liverpool Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. [online] The National Archives (UK). Available at: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/0bb9e16e-84d8-4998-ab96-f423dd0f4eed#:~:text=Administrative%20%2F%20biographical%20background%3A-.
• OECD (2019). What is child vulnerability and how can it be overcome? | Changing the Odds for Vulnerable Children : Building Opportunities and Resilience | OECD iLibrary. [online] www.oecd-ilibrary.org. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/23101e74-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/23101e74-en.
• Ojp.gov (2022). Welfare of Children Is Paramount: The Children Act 1989 | Office of Justice Programs. [online] www.ojp.gov. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/welfare-children-paramount-children-act-1989.
• The Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel (2022). Child Protection in England National review into the murders of Arthur Labinjo- Hughes and Star Hobson. [online] Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/628e262d8fa8f556203eb4f8/ALH_SH_National_Review_26-5-22.pdf.
• Theguardian (2005). Timeline: a history of child protection. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2005/may/18/childrensservices2#:~:text=The%20Children%20Act%201948%20established.
• Walsh, K. (2020). Complicating the Duality: Reconceptualising the Construction of Children in Victorian Child Protection Law. Journal of Historical Sociology, 33(2), pp.263–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12272.