Introduction of the Impact of Patient’s Culture on Healthcare Assignment
Get free written samples by subject experts and Assignment Writing Service UK.
The cultural background of a patient can have a significant influence on health treatment, and clinicians must be aware of this. Communication between doctors and patients is crucial, and literacy and language limitations can play a role. Being culturally aware, though, isn't only about providing an interpreter for people who need one. Many components of communication are nonverbal, and culture has a significant impact on medical relations (Marcelin et al., 2019).
Purpose and Rationale of the research
The purpose of this research is to identify and understand the impact of the culture of the patients on the healthcare service. It is important to recognise the cultural background of the patient in order to provide satisfactory healthcare services to the patients. Patients' ethnic heritage might influence everything from eye contact to who to address in the exam room. In recent years, cultural competency and patient-centeredness have been widely touted as ways to improve healthcare delivery. However, as they've grown in popularity and recognition, there's been a lot of confusion about what they mean and how to utilize them in different situations. Cultural competency is sometimes dismissed by proponents of patient-centeredness as just one facet of patient-centred care, while proponents of cultural competence frequently say the opposite.
Description of research methods
In order to understand the cultural background of the patients and realise its impact on the healthcare se4rvice, the qualitative, secondary data can be collected from some relevant research papers of the authors.
Impact of patient culture on health
According to the authors (Okuyama et al., 2018), technically, health is a cultural notion since our health is influenced by our life experiences and the cultural class to which we belong.
The following are some of the things that cultures help define:
- Individuals' health choices are influenced by their culture.
- When it comes to the reason of their sickness, patients may have a variety of opinions.
- The decision-maker considers the views of family members while making a final choice.
- Specific diseases and illnesses are stigmatized; for example, some specific cultures feel that consulting a psychiatrist indicates that the patient is "mad."
- Different types of practices and activities content to promote the health, which are already impacted. The example is seen as healthy and appealing in Canada.
- There are disparities in how people deal with pain and how they deal with the disease.
- Stoicism is a practice that should be encouraged in some civilizations.
- Stoicism is a practice that should be considered in the face of significant pain in some cultures. Others, on the other hand, think that no matter how minor or intense a person's pain is, it should be expressed.
- The health decisions of the patient are influenced by their culture. It also includes deciding on the right doctor, which physicians to consult, which experts to trust, and which primary doctor to trust.
- It also has an impact on how a patient communicates with his or her healthcare professional. Direct eye contact is a symbol of respect in various cultures.
- A patient's compliance with therapy and medicine may be influenced by his cultural views. While he normally keeps his decisions to himself, his family and even his extended relatives would meddle.
Cultural and personal meaning of chronic illness
Various chronic illnesses carry meanings that are additionally metaphoric beyond the sentence of death, such as faith tests, punishment, or contamination o.f the patients along with the family based on the personal culture of him or her (Shahin et al., 2019). The family and the patient equally get to bear several restrictions of the illness itself including the social stigma related to it. All societies have different types of rituals and these need attention for satisfying the customers. Its significance is seen in helping to back their memory and most importantly bringing back the memories of the family. In this context, the racial groups include non-Hispanic white, Asian American, Pacific Islander, African American/Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic. Disaggregating the various cultures within the non-Hispanic white category in order to expose the various features that are seen as a single homogeneous group. This can be used as an illustration of the inadequacy of such aggregated categories.
Some countries, like Scotland, Ireland, Italy, Greece, and others all fall under the non-Hispanic white group. Now, the application of such agglomerated groups in research or as practice guidelines is deceptive. In this respect, one study can be considered of the enrollment of senior patients in hospitals, use of ethnicity found that each of the four major racial or ethnic groups around The World had a reasonable similar distribution of enrollment. After considering the percentage among his panic black and non-Hispanic white, these are 37% and 42% respectively. These unfamiliar and odd figures display an important progression over the previous 10 years and it is also seen that non-Hispanic white patients were made up nearly 85% of hospice patients. After analysing the fact it is in that the satisfaction level among the patients with care and quality of care by group were not found in the research. According to Curtis et al., (2009I study, conducted in California, the quality of patient care for ethnic groups of color at the end of life and it continues to lag behind that of non-Hispanic white patients. If the purpose of palliative and hospice care is to provide high-quality care for all patients and each patient needs to be handled individually rather than as part of a group to achieve this goal.
Quality health care by professionals
The professional clinicians need to identify the distinctive history of each patient, details of generation, and environmental background of the patient in a holistic fashion. These are completely culturally based, but not stereotypical. It does not use predetermined means or results from a different culture to achieve the aim of quality treatment for all (Hansen, Braslow and Rohrbaugh, 2018). Thus, without a scientifically grounded evaluation, evidence-based palliative care or end-of-life care methods from one culture cannot be automatically "replicated" in another culture. It is foolish and destructive to assume that ideas and values are interchangeably valid and important across cultures. Patients from all walks of life tend to gain three basic needs as follows:
(1) an aspect of safety and security
(2) an aspect of integrity and meaning in life
(3) an aspect of belonging.
From the above concept, it can be said that actually of the alignment cannot be changed and it generally comes from the person and the cultural background of the family of the world view. In this respect to life circumstances also carry the essence of the capacity of one person for going through the chronic illness experience. In order to understand the core principles which the US society employs for developing the social systems for supporting 3 individual universal requirements of independence, autonomy, self-Reliance and bringing happiness for the patients. It can be assumed that these can access the patients for better comprehension to palliative care. Consequently, the validity of care and different types of end of life practices in the United States and across the world may be understood from the aspects of independence and autonomy of the patients. Also, it can be commented that different types of cultures involve the values which make the way the individual life of the patients and must be understood from the perspective of community welfare costs and benefits. Life is a kind of challenge, and humans always tries to do their best to make the most of it while accepting and human can not alter it.
Cultures that deny death
The advancement of Technology has broad lots of innovation in the health care sector and it may be prescribed in death-denying Nations as well. For example, it is seen that the United States has already tried to extend the life and frequently go beyond about the patients and with their families. It is also seen that the other cultures are more than accepting and they consist of the knowledge of life in peace, where the date is unavoidable. Such a kind of mindset has taken on the patients for mentioning how the patient and he is all our family accept death (Marcelinet al., 2019). They are also ready to see what can come in next. This type of white spread emphasises patients and their families keep the strings and this kindly gains from their belief in the quality of life. From the research, it is seen that around 80% of Americans of the United States give importance to their spirituality and chronically ill patients preferred to keep believing that everything can be cured through this belief. From the previous quality of life studies, it can be seen that it used to involve spirituality as a core concept. However, at the same time, it demonstrates the scientific communities lack of acknowledgement. In actuality, the primary scales were not modified until the mid-1990s. 28 And unreasonable separation impact the quality of care in this context and also can support which may be offered to relief existential has not been treating the individuals and family within the context of the spiritual origin. Consequently, hospitalisation in acute care settings across the globe may frequently generate barriers to the incorporation of necessary rituals. These rituals as a devotional and physician ties for those who are suffering and dying. The inclusion of extended family networks to ensure self and family continuity, and the expression of various grief expression modes.
Language as a cultural barrier in patient healthcare
In any situation, the inability to communicate properly may be highly restrictive and distressing. In a hospital context, when individuals feel apprehensive and vulnerable even in the happiest of circumstances, such as the delivery of a child, that stress is exacerbated, and that constraint has enormous ramifications on patient safety, health outcomes, and health inequalities (Houghton et al., 2020). In any situation, the inability to communicate properly may be highly restrictive and distressing. In a hospital context, when individuals feel apprehensive and vulnerable even in the happiest of circumstances, such as the delivery of a child, that stress is exacerbated, and that constraint has enormous ramifications on patient safety, health outcomes, and health inequalities (Okuyama et al., 2018). It is easy to forget how much of a barrier language and culture can be until you're in a situation where you don't speak English well. If they don't understand English, even booking an appointment might be difficult.
According to a 2015 CRICO Strategies Benchmarking Report, Malpractice Risks in Communication Failures, one-third of national malpractice claims involve a communication breakdown. This broad concept is laced with linguistic misunderstandings. Between 2009 and 2013, 55 percent of the 23,658 instances of miscommunication between physicians and patients were investigated. This, together with breakdowns in communication between two or more healthcare providers, account for 12% of the instances, indicating that provider miscommunication is a significant contributor to the problem. Due to irreparable patient harm caused by communication failures, there were 7,149 cases with a total cost of $1.7 billion. The culture was mentioned by 17 percent more people in the group.
Literacy in culture
Health literacy necessitates communication and common knowledge among families, patients, healthcare workers, and providers. The health literacy of the cultural group has an impact on the production and substance of the health care technique (Palumbo et al., 2019). In this context, an example can be considered that some individuals think that having a family dentist is important, while others prefer to use home remedies and traditional ways for oral health care (Ottosen, Mani and Fratta, 2019). Your cultural values have an impact on how you choose health care providers, treatments, and medications.
In addition, communication styles differ by culture. When it comes to physical health, health information, care providers, healthcare practices, and interventions, they are quite precise about the terminology and terminologies they use.
Hence, culture refers to a group of people's literacy and features, most notably their religious beliefs and faith, food, language, social customs, and so on. As a result, it may be described as the formation of group identity as a result of a distinctive social structure. However, many times patients fail to get the proper healthcare because of the culture they come from. For such, doctors would be able to communicate with their patients more effectively if they are aware of their beliefs, cultural differences, and habit.
Azzolini, E., Ricciardi, W. and Gray, M., 2018. Healthcare organizational performance: why changing the culture really matters. Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita, 54(1), pp.6-8.
Barkell, N.P. and Snyder, S.S., 2021, January. Just culture in healthcare: An integrative review. In Nursing Forum (Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 103-111).
Curtis, E., Jones, R., Tipene-Leach, D., Walker, C., Loring, B., Paine, S.J. and Reid, P., 2019. Why cultural safety rather than cultural competency is required to achieve health equity: a literature review and recommended definition. International journal for equity in health, 18(1), pp.1-17.
Hansen, H., Braslow, J. and Rohrbaugh, R.M., 2018. From cultural to structural competency—training psychiatry residents to act on social determinants of health and institutional racism. JAMA psychiatry, 75(2), pp.117-118.
Houghton, C., Meskell, P., Delaney, H., Smalle, M., Glenton, C., Booth, A., Chan, X.H.S., Devane, D. and Biesty, L.M., 2020. Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4).
Marcelin, J.R., Siraj, D.S., Victor, R., Kotadia, S. and Maldonado, Y.A., 2019. The impact of unconscious bias in healthcare: how to recognize and mitigate it. The Journal of infectious diseases, 220(Supplement_2), pp.S62-S73.
Okuyama, J.H.H., Galvao, T.F. and Silva, M.T., 2018. Healthcare professional’s perception of patient safety measured by the hospital survey on patient safety culture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Scientific World Journal, 2018.
Ottosen, T., Mani, N.S. and Fratta, M.N., 2019. Health information literacy awareness and capacity building: present and future. IFLA journal, 45(3), pp.207-215.
Palumbo, R., Annarumma, C., Manna, R., Musella, M. and Adinolfi, P., 2019. Improving quality by involving patient. The role of health literacy in influencing patients’ behaviors. International Journal of Healthcare Management.
Shahin, W., Kennedy, G.A. and Stupans, I., 2019. The impact of personal and cultural beliefs on medication adherence of patients with chronic illnesses: a systematic review. Patient preference and adherence, 13, p.1019.