Strategic Management And Leadership Assignment Sample

Strategic Management And Leadership Assignment

Assignment Task 1: Strategic

Introduction

This strategic report centres around General Electric (GE), a global conglomerate that is presently confronting monetary misfortunes, a slow-down market share, and an identity crisis. GE, established in 1892, has been a worldwide forerunner in varied innovation, assembling, and administration (Electric,General , 2023). Notwithstanding, ongoing difficulties have required an exhaustive examination of the organization's circumstances. This report will look at the connections between a procedure, partner anticipations, and authoritative execution inside GE. It will investigate outside factors influencing vital administration in a global setting, propose another technique, assess its effect on advancement and change, foster an execution plan, and satisfy partner assumptions for the organization's prosperity.

Experience top-rated assignment writing help in the UK with New Assignment Help. We provide free assignment samples to showcase our quality and dedication.

Focus on the relationships

On account of General Electric (GE), the connection between technique, partner assumptions, and authoritative execution is critical for the organization's turnaround. GE necessities to foster a methodology that lines up with the different assumptions for partners, including clients, representatives, financial backers, and networks (Narayanan, 2023). By getting it and tending to partner assumptions, like mechanical development, ecological maintainability, and monetary solidness, GE can come up with a technique that addresses their issues while driving hierarchical execution. A professional system that satisfies partner assumptions will upgrade GE's monetary presentation, reconstruct market trust, and restore its situation as a worldwide pioneer, guaranteeing its drawn-out feasibility (Scott, 2023).

For any business to be successful and long-lasting, the connection between strategy, stakeholder expectations, and organizational performance must be established. To dissect and make sense of these connections, we will take on the Resource Based View (RBV) hypothesis of key administration. The RBV hypothesis places that a company's upper hand and overall functionality are measured by its important assets, capacities, and centre skills. It stresses the interior investigation of an organization's assets instead of outside economic situations. This approach lines up with the ongoing circumstance of GE, as confronting inner difficulties have affected its exhibition (Cooper, et al., 2023). The RBV theory has been selected for varied reason which are discussed in detail below:

• Asset-Driven Point of View: The RBV hypothesis perceives that associations are exceptional because of their unique assets, abilities, and capabilities. By entering on these interior elements, GE can recognize its assets and shortcomings, and decide how they can motivate its system and execution (Aremu, 2023).
• Holistic Investigation: The RBV hypothesis empowers a thorough assessment, everything being equal, substantial, and intangible. This helps to figure out their effect on system execution and hierarchical results. This approach will empower us to consider a large number of elements impacting GE's exhibition, including its monetary, innovative, human, and reputational assets (Saputra, 2022).
• Long haul Supportability: By investigating GE's assets and capacities, it will help in recognizing regions where the organization has the potential for supported achievement, as the need might arise to improve or redistribute its assets to line up with partner assumptions (Okorie, 2023).
• Partner Situated Approach: By comprehending the partner anticipation, like clients, workers, financial backers, and networks, it will help GE to adjust to its system as per their requirements and inclinations, guaranteeing better hierarchical execution and partner fulfilment (Narayanan, 2023).
• Inward Concentration: The RBV hypothesis will assist the strategic managers with resolving GE's quick issues connected with asset designation, capacities advancement, and system execution (Saputra, 2022).

Overall, it can be said that by using this method, the strategic manager can identify the company's special resources, evaluate how well they meet stakeholder expectations, and make strategic suggestions that build on GE's advantages while resolving its disadvantages. In the long run, this will make it possible for the strategic leaders to create a sustainable plan that improves GE's performance and guarantees its future in the industry.

Impact of external factors on strategic management

External elements assume a critical part in moulding key administration, especially in a worldwide setting. Three key outer elements that influence key administration are financial, political, and social variables. In breaking down their effect, the PESTEL theory can be used to further describe this segment.

• Economic variables: By affecting market circumstances, buying power of consumers, and investment possibilities, economic variables have an impact on strategic decision-making. Economic variables including inflation, market demand, currency rates, and economic growth rates are crucial for GE. GE must evaluate the economic security of its target markets, spot new trends, and modify its strategy as necessary. As an example, a worldwide economic slump would need cost-cutting measures, but growth prospects in new areas might lead GE to expand its business activities (Pogue, 2009).
• Political Aspects: Political aspects include stability, laws, rules, and geopolitical dangers. Through influencing access to markets, trade agreements, and corporate operations, all of these factors have an impact on a company's strategic decisions. GE must examine elements including tax laws, trade restrictions, labour laws, and political stability while navigating political settings. For instance, modifications of federal legislation governing ecological requirements may have an effect on the energy-related goods and services offered by GE (Tjemkes, 2023).
• Cultural Factors: Social standards, attitudes, beliefs, and buying habits all fall under the heading of cultural factors. It's essential to comprehend cultural quirks in order to create marketing plans that work and modify items to suit local tastes. When GE expands worldwide, it requires taking cultural differences into account to make sure that its products are appealing to a variety of client groups. For example, GE's strategy in the healthcare equipment & technology sector may be impacted by cultural preferences surrounding healthcare practises (Ansoff, 2017).

These external elements' effects on tactical leadership in a global environment might present two possibilities and difficulties. Possibilities result from advantageous economic circumstances, encouraging governmental initiatives, and conformity to cultural values. As an example, GE may be able to increase its consumer base by taking advantage of the growing middle class in developing nations. On the other side, issues brought on by unstable politics, cultural diversity, and volatile markets may need modification and adaptation.

GE should carry out a thorough investigation of its external surroundings utilising methods like PESTEL analysis in order to adequately analyse the influence of external variables. With the aid of this research, GE will be better able to recognise opportunities and challenges, foresee changes, and create strategies that will reduce risks and take advantage of opportune external situations. GE may improve its competitive position, reduce possible risks, and increase its likelihood to thrive in the international economy by coordinating its tactical choices with the outside atmosphere (Francis, 2023).

New strategy to face the challenges

In light of the examination of both the interior and outside conditions of General Electric (GE), another procedure pointed toward tending to the difficulties the organization faces and meeting its authoritative targets. To plan this procedure, the study will make use of the SWOT examination system, which assesses the organization's assets, shortcomings, potential open doors, and dangers.

SWOT Analysis

Formulating the Strategy:

• Centre around key function:

GE ought to embrace a portfolio survey and strip non-centre organizations to smooth out tasks and pay off past commitments. This will permit the organization to centre its assets in key areas where it enjoys a cutthroat benefit, like flight business, environmentally friendly power, and medical services.

• Embrace Computerized Change:

GE ought to put resources into digitalization and influence trend-setting innovations to improve its items, administrations, and functional productivity. This incorporates utilizing the Web of Things (IoT), information examination, and man-made brainpower to drive development, further develop resource execution, and offer some benefit-added answers for clients.

• Upgrade Supportability Drives:

Given the developing interest in practical arrangements, GE ought to focus on sustainable power and eco-accommodating items. This incorporates extending its arrangement of wind and sun-powered energy arrangements, putting resources into energy capacity innovations, and advancing energy productivity measures across enterprises.

• Fortify Client Connections:

GE ought to zero in on developing and extending its associations with existing clients while effectively chasing after new organizations. This can be accomplished by giving remarkable client support, offering tweaked arrangements, and growing long-haul joint efforts to address explicit industry challenges.

Evaluation and Justification

The procedure's viability can be assessed through key execution pointers for example, income development, productivity, piece of the pie, consumer loyalty, and advancement measurements. Ordinary checking and assessment of these KPIs will give experience into the methodology's effect on authoritative execution.

Explain how business strategy encourages and supports innovation and change

The proposed business tactics for General Electric (GE) foster and upholds advancement and change by means of a few key components. To consider its adequacy in contrast to contending systems, the review will utilize the Innovation Ambition Matrix structure.

Empowering Development:

• Embracing Advanced Change:The system advances the reception of computerized advancements, information examination, and the Web of Things (IoT) to drive development across GE's item portfolio and functional cycles. This empowers the advancement of smart and associated arrangements that improve execution, proficiency, and client encounters.
• Putting resources into Innovative work:The methodology stresses the significance of Research and development speculation to encourage advancement. GE can dispense assets to propel innovation advancement, investigate new market open doors, and remain at the front line of industry patterns (Nagji, 2021).
• Advancing Coordinated effort:The system supports cooperation both inside and remotely. GE can team up with accomplices, new businesses, and scholastic establishments to cultivate an environment system of development, trade information, and influence different mastery for advanced thoughts and arrangements (Roberts, 2016).

Supporting Change:

• Agile and Versatile Culture: The system advances an agile and versatile culture inside GE, empowering representatives to embrace change, face challenges, and accept various risks. This supports ceaseless improvement and works with the execution of novel thoughts and cycles.
• Change administration: The procedure integrates compelling change in the board practices to direct representatives via authoritative changes. This incorporates correspondence, preparation, and emotionally supportive networks to guarantee smooth advances and limit protection from change.
• Learning and Advancement:The methodology underlines learning and improvement drives to upgrade workers' abilities and capacities. This incorporates giving chances to preparing, upskilling, and cross-utilitarian openness to encourage a learning society that upholds development and change.

Evaluation against Competing Strategies

The proposed methodology adds to the outcome of GE by separating it from contending procedures through the accompanying perspectives:

• Centre around technology-based development:The system's main focus on advanced change and interest in Research and development positions GE as an industry chief in innovation-driven development. This empowers GE to foster state-of-the-art items and administrations, remaining in front of contenders and meeting developing client needs (Javid, 2023).
• Client-Driven Arrangements: The methodology's attention to client connections and customized arrangements separates GE from contenders. By understanding client issues and inclinations, GE can foster creative contributions that offer extraordinary benefits and upgrade consumer loyalty (Cassar, 2022).
• Flexibility to Market Patterns:This empowers the organization to take advantage of arising chances, answer troublesome powers, and go around contenders who might be slower to adjust.
• Cooperative Environment: The procedure's advancement of joint effort cultivates an eco-system of development This helps in empowering GE to take advantage of outside skills, influence associations, and access new business sectors. This cooperative methodology upgrades GE's capacity to create weighty thoughts and drive market disturbance (Aghion, 2023).
• Supportability and Natural Obligation:The technique's accentuation on maintainability drives separates GE by lining up with developing business sector requests for eco-accommodating arrangements (Li, 2023).

Develop an implementation plan for the strategy

Below given table will show the implementation plan for the strategy developed for GE.

Fulfilling Stakeholder Expectations:

• Investors:The execution plan expects to work on monetary execution and make the long haul an incentive for investors through portfolio advancement, computerized change, and functional proficiency.
• Clients:By centring on client connections and giving customized arrangements, the arrangement plans to upgrade consumer loyalty, meet their developing requirements, and give imaginative items and administrations.
• Representatives: The arrangement incorporates change administration, learning, and improvement valuable open doors (Gulati, 2023).
• Society:Through supportability drives, the arrangement plans to add to a more feasible future by creating eco-accommodating arrangements.
• Accomplices and Providers:Coordinated effort drives to advance commonly helpful connections, information sharing, and development organizations.
• Controllers and Government:Consistence with guidelines and dynamic commitment with policymakers guarantee adherence to lawful prerequisites and add to a positive administrative climate (Góes, 2023).

Recommendations and Conclusion

Based on the above study below created are some recommendations for the strategy developed in the above study:

• Consistently screen and re-evaluate the interior and outside conditions
• Sustain a culture of development all through the association by empowering imagination,
• Keep up with open and straightforward correspondence channels with partners to comprehend their advancing necessities and assumptions

Taking everything into account, the proposed methodology for General Electric spotlights utilizing centre qualities, embracing advanced change, advancing maintainability, upgrading client connections, and working on functional effectiveness. By executing this methodology, GE can address its difficulties, recapture monetary steadiness, rejuvenate its market position, and guarantee long-haul maintainability.

Assignment Task 2: Organizational redesign

Analyse the current organizational structure and evaluate its effectiveness in meeting organizational objectives

Analysis of Current Organizational Structure:

The present organizational structure of GE is usually identified as following the hierarchical functional structure. This construction is portrayed by numerous layers of the board, with dynamic authority aggregated at the top and flowing down through different useful divisions like designing, money, activities, and deals. The association is partitioned into specialty units in light of product offerings, each with its own arrangement of capabilities and announcing structure (Dongxuan, 2020). The ongoing association graph is as per the following:

While the hierarchical functional structure enjoys its benefits, for example, clear announcing lines and concentrated aptitude inside every division, it represents a few difficulties in gathering the goals of the new procedure inside GE. The construction, first and foremost, will in general cultivate storehouses and restricted cross-useful cooperation. Correspondence and data stream between various divisions might be slow and divided, restraining development and deftness. Also, the focal point of the construction is much of the time on inner cycles and works as opposed to the necessities of clients. This can bring about an absence of client centricity, making it hard to foster customized arrangements and give a consistent client experience.

Evaluation of Effectiveness:

Although the ongoing construction might have served GE well before, it represents a few difficulties in gathering the targets of the new technique. These difficulties include:

• Siloed Navigation:The progressive construction will in general encourage storehouses, with restricted cross-practical joint effort and correspondence. This hampers advancement and readiness, as a data stream and dynamic cycles are slow and divided.
• Absence of Client Concentration:The useful construction frequently prompts an emphasis on inside techniques and works instead of the requirements of clients. This represses the association's capacity to foster client-driven arrangements and give a consistent client experience (Dr. Ngoie, 2014).
• Failures and Redundancies: The ongoing construction might bring about copied endeavours, shortcomings, and repetitive jobs across various specialty units. This prompts asset wastage and limits the association's capacity to smooth out activities and lessen costs.
• Restricted Responsibility:With dynamic authority assembled at the top, responsibility becomes diffused, making it trying to consider people and groups responsible for their presentation and results (Clawson, 2018).

Reasons for Restructuring

To empower the execution of the new system effectually, a rebuilding of the association is required. The purposes behind rebuilding include:

• Upgrading Advancement and Joint Effort:The proposed procedure provides emphasis on the significance of development and cooperation. A rebuilt association can divide the utilitarian storehouses and make cross-useful groups or venture teams centred on unambiguous development drives. This works with cooperation, information sharing, and the advancement of leading-edge thoughts.
• Developing Client Concentration: Rebuilding can empower the association to turn out to be more client driven. By redesigning around client sections or markets, GE can guarantee that all capabilities and methods are adjusted to address client issues and assumptions.
• Smoothing out functions:The ongoing design might prompt failures and redundancies. A rebuilt association can smooth out tasks by solidifying covering capabilities, disposing of copy jobs, and working on dynamic cycles. This upgrades functional proficiency and cost adequacy.
• Upgrading Responsibility: A rebuilt association can lay out clear lines of responsibility and dynamic power. This further develops straightforwardness, works with execution assessment, and guarantees that people and groups are capable and responsible for their commitments to authoritative goals (Umar, 2023).

Proposed Organizational Restructuring:

The proposed hierarchical rebuilding for GE is a matrix lattice structure joined with components of a network structure. This construction is intended to cultivate advancement, cooperation, and coordination across the association.

Structure Changes Described:

Implementation of Cross-Functional Teams: To drive innovative initiatives and strategic projects, cross-functional teams will be formed. These teams will be created by assembling people from various functions to work towards a shared objective. This promotes cooperation, knowledge exchange, and the blending of various viewpoints.

Business Units That Are Client-Centric: The organisation will be reorganised around client segments or markets, resulting in specialised business units that are committed to addressing the particular demands of different customer groups. Each business unit will have its own set of capabilities, allowing for quicker decision-making and a customer-centric approach.

Evaluate the restructure plan

While the designed rebuild plan for General Electric (GE), holds a few advantages, it is fundamental to basically assess expected issues and unfortunate results that might emerge during the execution. Tending to these worries and having relief procedures set up will guarantee a smooth change and boost the viability of the rebuilding endeavours. The accompanying issues ought to be thought of:

• Protection from Change: Rebuilding can be met with obstruction from workers who are acquainted with the current authoritative construction and cycles. Obstruction might emerge because of insecurity of occupation instability, loss of force or impact, and newness to the new jobs and obligations. To beat this, it is pivotal to convey the purposes behind the rebuilding and the advantages it brings, include representatives all the while, give preparation and support, and underline the positive effect on their professions and the association.
• Absence of Arrangement: In any case that the rebuilding plan isn't very much lined up with the general system and goals, it might bring about shortcomings and an absence of concentration. It is urgent to guarantee that the proposed structure upholds the essential objectives of GE and empowers the accomplishment of wanted results. Ordinary checking and assessment ought to be directed to evaluate the viability of the new construction and make fundamental changes on a case-by-case basis.
• Coordination Difficulties: Incorporating various capabilities, specialty units, and groups can be tested, particularly when they have been working autonomously. Correspondence and joint effort might endure during the progress time frame, prompting deferrals and misconceptions. To address this, laying out cross-practical groups, carrying out compelling specialized devices and cycles, and advancing a culture of coordinated effort and information sharing are fundamental.
• Potential Fights for Control: Presenting a matrix design can make power fights and clashes over dynamic power. To relieve this, it is vital to obviously characterize choice privileges and engage people with the fundamental power to settle on choices inside their spaces. Successful authority and compromise systems can assist with dealing with any power elements and guarantee the smooth working of the association.
• Execution Expenses: Rebuilding endeavours can bring about tremendous costs connected with preparing, innovation mix, and potential severance bundles. It is vital to watchfully survey the monetary ramifications and foster a spending arrangement to successfully deal with these expenses. Furthermore, a complete change in the board technique ought to be carried out to limit disturbance and guarantee consistent progress.

To defeat these possible issues and adverse results, the accompanying methodologies can be utilized:

• Successful Correspondence and Commitment: Straightforward and reliable correspondence is urgent to acquire purchases from representatives and partners. Drawing in workers in the meantime, requesting their feedback, and tending to their interests will encourage a feeling of pride and obligation to the rebuilding plan.
• Change Administration: Carrying out powerful change administration tactics will assist with overseeing obstruction and guarantee a smooth progress. This incorporates giving preparation and backing, laying out an unmistakable vision and reason, and cultivating a culture of persistent learning and transformation.
• Consistent Observing and Assessment: Routinely checking and assessing the adequacy of the rebuilding plan will take into consideration opportune changes and upgrades. Key execution markers ought to be laid out to follow the progress and measure the effect of the new design on hierarchical execution.
• Authority and Responsibility: Influential administration is vital for guiding the rebuilding endeavours and guaranteeing responsibility at all levels. Pioneers ought to show others how it's done, advance coordinated effort, and give direction and backing to representatives during the progress time frame (Muringazuva, 2017).

Elevate Your Academic Performance! New Assignment Help offers the best management assignment support, helping you navigate through difficult concepts and demanding deadlines. Our services are designed to enhance your learning experience and boost your grades. Partner with us today and watch your academic performance soar!

References

Aghion, P., 2023. Environmental Preferences and Technological Choices: Is Market Competition Clean or Dirty?. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW: INSIGHTS, 5(1).

Ansoff, H. I., 2017. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY. Journal of Business Strategy.

Aremu, A. Y., 2023. The usage of enterprise resource planning system to enhancing performance of medium-sized business excellence. International Journal of Business Excellence, 30(1), pp. 94-110.

Cassar, A., 2022. Sustaining the potential for cooperation as female competitive strategy. PTRS.

Clawson, J. G., 2018. Organizational Structure. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Cooper, S. C., Pereira, V. & Vrontis, D. a. L. Y., 2023. Extending the resource and knowledge based view: Insights from new contexts of analysis. Journal of Business Research, Volume 156.

Dongxuan, F., 2020. Research on General Electric Organizational Structure Reform Based on Hofstede's Cultural Dimension Theory. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Volume 466.

Dr. Ngoie, O. M., 2014. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY CASE STUDY, s.l.: Argosy University, Chicago,.

Electric,General , 2023. GE Mission Statement & Values. [Online]
Available at: https://www.ge.com/about-us#:~:text=The%20General%20Electric%20Company%20(GE,Energy%2C%20Aviation%20and%20Healthcare%20industries.
[Accessed 13 June 2023].

Francis, A., 2023. The Competitiveness of European Industry. reprint ed. s.l.:Taylor & Francis,.

Góes, ,. A. d. A., 2023. Managing for stakeholders towards corporate environmental sustainability, s.l.: Wiley Online Library .

Gulati, R., 2023. Can Purpose Foster Stakeholder Trust in Corporations?. Strategy Science.

Javid, N. J., 2023. Evaluating the Effect of Supply Chain Management Practice on Implementation of Halal Agroindustry and Competitive Advantage for Small and Medium Enterprises. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology , 15(6), pp. 8997-9008.

Li, X., 2023. Time for upgrades? In time for consumers and competition. International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 256.

Muringazuva, A. C., 2017. An evaluation of the proposed organisation restructuring at Kadoma city, 2015. Pan Afr Med J, p. 27: 20..

Nagji, B. a. T., 2021. A Simple Tool You Need to Manage, s.l.: HBR ORG.

Narayanan, S., 2023. Empirical Study On The Effects Of Corporate Social Responsibility On Organizational Performance In The Manufacturing Sector: A Case Study On Nigeria: Flour Mills Nigeria Plc. Social Science Journal, 13(2).

Okorie, O., 2023. Digital transformation and the circular economy: Creating a competitive advantage from the transition towards Net Zero Manufacturing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Volume 189.

Pogue, D., 2009. Management Policy and Strategy, s.l.: Golden Gate University.

Roberts, E. B., 2016. What We've Learned: Managing Invention and Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 31(3), pp. 11-29.

Saputra, B. A., 2022. Understanding Diversification Strategies of An Indonesia’s, s.l.: Proceedings of the 5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.

Scott, S., 2023. Business and Society: A Critical Introduction. 2 ed. s.l.:Bloomsbury Publishing.

Shinde, P. A., 2023. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of supercapacitors: A review. Journal of Energy Chemistry, Volume 79, pp. 611-638.

Tjemkes, B., 2023. Strategic Alliance Management. 3, illustrated ed. s.l.:Taylor & Francis, .

Umar, M. A., 2023. Corporate Restructuring: A Strategy for Improving Organizational Performance. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences , 14(1), pp. 1-11.