Business Analysis and Planning Assignment Sample

Guide to Business Analysis and Planning Assignment: Strategies and Insights

  • 54000+ Project Delivered
  • 500+ Experts 24x7 Online Help
  • No AI Generated Content
- +
35% Off
£ 6.69
Estimated Cost
£ 4.35
21 Pages 5293Words

Introduction Of Business Analysis and Planning

This report present an outline of the trends in the social care housing sector in England, with a exact focus on the government's viewpoint regarding cost-saving measures and efficiency development. The report aims to give valuable insights to a cross-party group of Members of Parliament (MPs) who are conduct a fact-finding mission, with input from key stakeholders, as well as researchers and expert in the field. The social care housing sector in England plays a vital role in sustaining susceptible individuals and communities by provide safe and suitable housing options alongside necessary care services (Cadersaib, et. al. 2020). As the demand for social care continues to mount, the government recognizes the need for cost-saving strategies and competence improvements to make sure the sustainability of the part.

Struggling to find the assignment help online in the UK? New Assignment Help has you covered! With our specialized assignment services in the UK, you'll breeze through your academic tasks effortlessly. And don't forget to download our assignment sample for reference.

Critical discussion on the governmental history and situation in which ‘value for money' matters

The social care housing sector in England is challenge by rising demand, limited resources, and increasing costs. Within this framework, the government's focus on achieve value for money has been innermost to its thinking on saving costs and improving competence in the sector. Value for money refers to obtain the utmost benefit from obtainable resources while ensure quality services and outcome (Longva, et. al. 2020). To understand the government's thoughts on value for money in the social care housing sector, it is critical to consider the broader situation. This includes:

  • Funding constraints: The health sector faces financial constraint due to limited resources and rising demand. The government's focus on value for money arises from the need to optimize obtainable funding and deliver sustainable services.
  • Public expectations: rising public prospect for quality services within a controlled budget have lead the government to prioritize value for money. It aims to beat a balance between cost-saving events and maintain service quality and convenience.
  • Performance and outcome: The government's focus on value for money also stem from the wish to get better presentation and outcomes in the social care housing sector. By ensure well-organized resource allocation, it aims to improve service effectiveness, individual happiness and overall system presentation (Balakrishnan, al. 2023).

While the government focus on saving costs and improving competence is crucial, several challenges and considerations must be taken into account:

  • Balancing quality and cost: prominent the right balance connecting cost-saving measures and maintain high-quality services is a important challenge. Cutting costs without careful consideration May cooperation the quality of care and housing provide.
  • Long-Term Investment: The government should identify the significance of long-term investment in the social care accommodation sector (Pritchard, 2022). Excessively focusing on short-term cost savings may guide to insufficient infrastructure, labor force shortages, and diminished service excellence in the future.
  • Collaboration and integration: achieve value for money requires teamwork and incorporation among diverse stakeholders, including housing providers, local authorities, and care service providers. Effectual coordination and partnership working are essential to rationalize services and optimize resources (Dellink, al. 2020).

Types of information identify from research covering the last 10 -15 years

Over the past decade, there has been an important increase in the order for social care housing in England. This can be accredited to factors such as an aging populace, rising occurrence of chronic illnesses, and changes in concern preference towards community-based settings. There has been a rising emphasis on incorporate health and social care services to provide more faultless and synchronized care (Yang, et. al. 2021). This transfer aims to get better outcomes for persons by ensuring that their health and social care requirements are addressed holistically. There has been a growing focus on modified care and individual option in the social care housing sector. Efforts have been complete to provide persons with more options and manage over their living preparations and the services they take delivery of. Extra care housing also recognized as assisted living or sheltered accommodation has experienced major growth. These housing replicas provide a poise of independence and on-site care and hold up services for older adults or persons with precise care wants. The acceptance of expertise in social care housing has enlarged over the years. This includes the use of digital platforms for care organization, assistive technologies to hold up independent living, and inaccessible monitoring systems for health and security. The social care housing sector in England has faced challenge related to aging transportation (Meyer, et. al. 2021). Many existing care homes and housing amenities require renovation or redevelopment to get together modern standards and house the altering needs of residents. The social care sector has knowledgeable ongoing funding pressures, foremost to concerns about sustainability and the quality of care provide. The debate around lasting funding solutions and social care reform has been important over the past decade.

It is vital to consider that these trends are base on wide-ranging observations and may not confine the full complication and nuance of the social care housing sector in England. The data collected includes:

  • Care Act 2014: this Act introduced important reforms to the social care system in England. It meant to endorse individual well-being and personalization of care, emphasize preventive services, addition of health and social care, and greater than before hold up for careers.
  • Dilnot Commission: In 2011, this has published a report propose reforms to the funding of social care in England. The information recommended a cap on persons care costs and a boost in the threshold for means-testing, but these recommendations have not yet been completely implemented.
  • Better Care Fund: this was established in 2014 to support closer incorporation between health and social care services (Henriques, al. 2022). It provides backing to local authorities and scientific commissioning groups to hold up joint working and get better outcomes for persons.
  • Building the right support: This agenda, launched in 2015, meant to change care for people with knowledge disabilities and/or autism. It focused on developing community-based hold up services, plummeting reliance on institutional care, and promote independent living.
  • Grenfell tower fire: The tragic Grenfell Tower fire in 2017 highlighted security concerns in social housing. It led to improved scrutiny of structure regulations, fire security standards, and the quality of social housing across the state.
  • Green Paper on social care: In 2018, the UK government announces plans to bring out Green Paper exactness proposals for the future of social care in England. The Green Paper aims to compact with long-term funding issues, labor force challenges, and integration of health and social care (Zafary, 2020). Though, as of my information cutoff in September 2021, the Green Paper had not yet been published.
  • Care Quality Commission (CQC) Inspections: this regularly inspects and rates care homes and social care provider in England. These inspections play a vital role in ensuring the quality and safety of care services and driving improvement in the segment.

The range and types of data available concerning how ‘health and social care services are coasted and delivered'

The NHS (National Health Service) and social care are both crucial components of the healthcare organization in the United Kingdom. Whereas they are divide entities, they work together to give comprehensive healthcare services to the populace. The NHS is a overtly funded healthcare system that provide free or low-cost healthcare services to populace of the UK. It offers a wide variety of medical services, including primary care, authority consultations, hospital care, crisis services, and mental health services (Suh and Holmes, 2022). The company is funded through general taxation, and its primary goal is to ensure that everybody in the UK has admittance to healthcare services in spite of their capability to pay.

Social care refers to the hold up and help provided to individuals who require help with daily activities or have exact social or health-related needs. This can comprise individuals with disabilities, elderly people or those with chronic illnesses. Social care services are meant at promoting self-government, improving well-being, and enable individuals to live satisfying lives.

While the NHS provides medical care, social care services are characteristically provided by local establishment or private organizations, often operational in partnership (Knapp and Wong, 2020). Social care is means-tested, meaning that persons may be necessary to contribute towards the cost of their care base on their income and assets. But, certain groups, such as children in need and individuals with composite health needs, are entitled to social care services free of charge. The coordination between the NHS and social care is vital to ensure that persons receive integrated and faultless care. This is mainly important for persons with complex health wants who may require both medical and social hold up. Teamwork between healthcare professionals, social workers, and other stakeholders is essential to deliver holistic care that addresses the mental, physical, and social well-being of individuals.

In recent years, there have been continuing discussions and debates about the funding and integration of social care services and NHS in the UK. The aging population, rising demand for services, and financial pressures have highlighted the need for reform to make sure the sustainability and efficiency of the healthcare system (Tingey, et. al. 2021). These deliberations aspire to address challenge such as workforce shortages, funding gaps, and improving the harmonization between health and social care sectors to provide high-quality care for all. Investigating the variety and types of data available concerning how health and social care services are coasted and delivered can offer insights into the functioning of these services (Rose, et. al. 2023). It is significant to note that the ease of use of specific data may vary depending on the healthcare system, authority, and data collection practices. Access to certain data may also be subject matter to privacy and privacy regulations.

Costing and delivery of health and social care services in England involves a variety of factors, including local authority budgets, government funding, and various types of service provision. The subsequent are some key points concerning the cost and delivery of these services:

  • Funding: Health and social care services in England are fund through a arrangement of public funds, including central administration allocations and local power budgets (Ramadan, al. 2022). The National Health Service (NHS) is accountable for funding healthcare services, while local authorities are accountable for funding and deliver social care services.
  • Service User Group Costs: The cost of services for detailed user groups can differ depending on their requirements and the level of care necessary. Weekly costs for service user groups are resolute based on factors such as housing or home care, the level of support required, location, and additional services provided.
  • Government requirements: The administration sets requirements and policy to ensure the quality and safety of health and social care services. These necessities cover areas such as care standards, staffing ratios, safeguarding procedures, and regulatory compliance.

Trends in the Social Care Housing Sector in England are subject to a variety of development in recent years. There is a rising emphasis on integrate health and social care services to provide more harmonized and personalized care. This involves closer collaboration among health and social care provider, as well as the encouragement of community-based care and support services (Marczak, et. al. 2019). The use of technology and innovative solution in social care housing is growing. This includes the acceptance of digital platforms for care organization, assistive technologies to hold up independent living, and remote monitor systems for health and safety. Extra care housing, also known as assisted living or sheltered housing, is flattering more common. These housing options aspire to provide self-governing living with on-site care and hold up services for older adults or persons with specific care requirements. There is a change towards housing models that unite accommodation and on-site care services. example include retirement villages, care homes, and support living schemes, which offer a range of housing options and care services modified to individual requirements. The social care sector faces continuing challenge related to funding and sustainability. Rising demands for services, attached with financial pressures on local establishment and providers, have led to deliberations about long-term funding solution and improvement of the social care system.

It is significant to note that these trends can develop over time, and for the most correct and up-to-date information (Geels and Gregory, 2023). it would be best to check with specific information, research studies, or contact pertinent local authorities or organization working in the health and social care sector in England. The government has certainly issued a variety of strategies and set of laws in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to the stipulation of health and social care services within the NHS. These strategy and system was implementing to address the challenges pose by the pandemic and make sure the delivery of safe and effectual care. Some key initiative and system introduce by the government include:

  • COVID-19 Vaccination Program:The administration launched an wide COVID-19 vaccination program to inoculate the population adjacent to the virus (Young, al. 2022). This program included prioritizing diverse groups based on susceptibility and age, and setting up inoculation centers across the country.
  • Testing and contact tracing:The administration implements widespread testing for COVID-19, as well as PCR testing and later swift lateral flow testing, to recognize and isolate infected persons. Contact tracing systems were also recognized to trace and notify persons who may have come into get in touch with with a long-established case.
  • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Provision:The regime introduced regulations to ensure the sufficient provision of PPE to healthcare workers, including gloves, masks, gowns, and face shields (Elwell-Sutton, al. 2019). This was vital to protect healthcare employees and reduce the risk of communication.
  • Emergency hospital capacity:they have set up provisional emergency hospitals, such as the Nightingale hospitals, to give additional bed ability for COVID-19 patients. These hospitals were recognized in a variety of regions to lessen pressure on existing healthcare amenities.
  • Temporary changes to care delivery:To lodge the increased demand and prioritize COVID-19 patients, provisional changes were made to care delivery. This included the rearrangement of non-urgent not obligatory procedures and the implementation of virtual or isolated consultations where suitable.
  • Infection prevention and control measures:severe infection prevention and control events were implement in healthcare settings to reduce the spread of COVID-19 (Weber, 2021). This included improved cleaning protocols, social estrangement measures, and the endorsement of hand hygiene.
  • Regulatory flexibilities:The administration introduced provisional regulatory flexibilities to enable healthcare provider to respond efficiently to the pandemic. This included changes to personnel regulations and adaptations to examine delivery models.

It is significant to note that the government's strategy and system related to COVID-19 in the NHS are dynamic and have evolve over time as the situation has changed (Rizan, et. al. 2021). Monitoring administrator government sources, such as the Department of Health and Social Care or NHS England, will give the most up-to-date information on the exact strategy and regulations in place.

A comparison of the trends over a period of time wills help develop a projection of activities which could be based on assumptions

Reports and publications can give valuable insight into the use of direct operating cost and funding for register care homes in England. Conduct a literature review and compare trends over time can help to develop a projection of activities based on assumptions.

Searching for reports, studies, and publications that specially focus on the financing and funding of registered care homes in England. Sources that will provide detailed information on funding streams, direct expenses, and government allocations. By consulting official administration publications, such as reports from the Department of Health and Social Care or the NHS that offer information on funding stream like the Better Care Fund (Kuyken, et. al. 2022). This publication may draw round the objectives, allocation, and outcome of the funding initiative and can propose insights into the government's thoughts on cost-saving and competence improvement. The CQC frequently inspects and rates care homes in England. Their reports review the quality and safeties of care provide by these homes and can offer insights into how financial hold up is being utilize. Examining trends in the CQC reports over a stage of time to identify any changes in the excellence and safety of care and how funding may have prejudiced these outcomes. Comparing financial data and funding allocations for register care homes over a specific period and looking for patterns and changes in funding levels, expenditure, and the impact on care quality. This comparative analysis can help recognize trends and provide a basis for prognostic future activities, Based on the trends recognized in the literature and financial data, build up assumptions about future activities in the social care housing sector (Cojocaru, et. al. 2020). Consider factors such as policy priorities, changing demographics, and potential funding constraints. Use this assumption to project potential future scenarios and their implication for funding and competence in the sector.

A comparison of trends over a period of time can be a precious tool for developing projections of activities in the health and social care sector. By analyze historical data and identify patterns, it is achievable to make informed assumptions that can inform future projection.

  • Government Publications: Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) release various reports, white papers, and policy documents related to health and social care in England. Their bureaucrat website is a valuable reserve for accessing such information. The NHS publishes reports and guidance on healthcare finance and the stipulation of social care services (Paris, al. 2019). The NHS England website and the websites of local Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) often give relevant information.
  • Official Reports and Inquiries: Reports from parliamentary select committee, such as the Health and Social Care Committee, often include information on the financing and relief of health and social care services. These reports can be established on the UK Parliament website. Reports from public investigation, such as the Dilnot Commission report, give valuable insights into the financing and financial support of social care in England. These reports are more often than not publicly available and can be access through official inquiry websites.
  • Academic Papers and Research Studies: Scholarly journals focus on health policy, social care, and finances often publish research papers that inspect the financing and release of health and social care services in England (Aldersey-Williams, al. 2019). These papers can be access through academic databases or libraries. Organizations such as the Nuffield Trust, King's Fund, and Institute for Fiscal Studies often publish reports and research papers on health and social care financing in England. Their websites can be a precious source of information.

It is significant to note that projection based on trend and assumption is not precise prediction, but rather knowledgeable estimates of potential future development (Heidari, et. al. 2022). Standard reassessment and modification of assumptions based on new information and changing situation are necessary to process and get better the correctness of the projections.

An understanding of how specific software tools aid in decision making

When it comes to analyze trends in the social care housing sector and sustaining decision-making related to cost-saving and improving competence, specific software tools like MS Excel can be helpful. Here is how MS Excel and other data analysis tools support in decision-making processes:

Data Management and Analysis: this tool allows for well-organized data management, organization, and analysis. It provides spreadsheet functionality that enables users to store, input, and manipulate data efficiently. Users can utilize Excel's features to filter, sort, and collective data, making it easier to recognize patterns, trends, and outliers within the social care housing sector. Excel's powerful formula and functions permit for complex calculations and numerical analyses, enabling users to derive insights and make data-driven decisions.

Visualization of Data: These offers a variety of charting and graphing capability allow users to visualize data in a variety of formats such as line charts, bar graphs, and pie charts. Visual representations of data can assist stakeholders, including MPs and cross-party committee, appreciate and interpret complex trends and pattern more easily (Freitag, et. al. 2021). This tool format options allow users to modify charts and graphs to efficiently communicate key result and support decision-making.

The possible impact of various decisions and methods can be evaluated with the help of scenario modelling and what-if analysis, both of which are supported in Microsoft Excel. Users can generate a variety of scenarios by modifying a number of inputs and making a number of assumptions, and then view the effects on several performance indicators. Decision-makers in the social care housing sector can use Excel's in-built scenario management tools and sensitivity analysis functions to compare various strategies for cutting costs and increasing productivity.

Fourth, data integration and reporting are possible because to MS Excel's ability to connect to other databases and programmers. Users can gain a more complete picture of the social care housing market by importing data from additional sources like databases and internet repositories into their analyses. Users can easily produce short reports, presentations, and dashboards in Excel to share their findings and ideas with others in the organization.

Microsoft Excel facilitates communication and coordination between all parties involved in a decision-making process. Excel allows for concurrent editing, so multiple people can review and provide feedback on a single document. Excel's built-in version control tools make it easy to keep tabs on edits, revisit previous iterations, and keep a solid paper trail of who did what and when.

Data analysis, visualization, scenario modelling, and collaboration features found in software like Microsoft Excel can help decision-makers gain insight into trends, propel evidence-based decision-making, and effectively communicate findings to cross-party committees and other stakeholders.


The report concludes that the trend in the social care housing sector in England reveal a pressing requirement to address the challenges related to cost-saving, funding, and improving competence. The Government's thoughts on these matters are crucial in determining the future of healthcare and social care condition.

The healthcare sector in England has been grapple with funding restraint over the past two decades. The rising demand for health and social care services, joined with limited financial resources, pose important challenges for delivering high-class care. There has been a distinguished shift in the priority and approaches for finance healthcare. The importance has moved towards incorporated working, as highlighted in the NHS five year frontward view. The Government recognizes the meaning of collaboration and organization amid different healthcare and social care providers to make sure seamless care delivery and efficient resource share. The administration is aggressively exploring strategies to save costs in the social care housing sector. This includes promoting competence, streamlining administrative process, and optimizing resource allocation. These efforts aspire to make sure that available funding is maximize and used successfully to meet the growing demands of an aging population. Improving competence in the social care housing sector is a key main concern for the Government. This involve adopt innovative technologies, enhancing care harmonization, and implement evidence-based practices to bring cost-effective and high-class care services.

To address these challenges, it is necessary for the Government to carry on investing in research and data-driven executive. Robust data compilation, analysis, and forecasting methodologies are vital to inform resource allocation, policy development, and monitoring of outcome. In addition, collaboration with key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, researchers, and social care providers, is fundamental to make sure that policies and strategies are evidence-based and approachable to the evolving requirements of the population.

In conclusion, the tendency in the social care housing sector calls for a complete and coordinated approach from the Government to deal with funding challenges, prioritize cost-saving measures, and progress competence. By harness the power of data, evidence-based administrative, and partnership, the Government can cover the way for a sustainable and effectual healthcare system that meet the requirements of the population while ensure value for money and enhanced outcomes in the social care housing sector.


  • Aldersey-Williams, J., Broadbent, I.D. and Strachan, P.A., 2019. Better estimates of LCOE from audited accounts–A new methodology with examples from United Kingdom offshore wind and CCGT.Energy policy,128, pp.25-35.
  • Balakrishnan, K., El-Said, A.T. and Lazar, Z., 2023.Competition versus Sole Sourcing in Defence Procurement What are the Factors that Determine Tendering Methods in Government Contracting for Delivering ‘Value for Money'?. Acquisition Research Program.
  • Cadersaib, B.Z., Ahku, Y., Sahib-Kaudeer, N.G., Khan, M.H.M. and Gobin, B., 2020, November. A review of skills relevant to enterprise resource planning implementation projects. In2020 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS)(pp. 172-177). IEEE.
  • Cojocaru, F.D., Botezat, D., Gardikiotis, I., Uritu, C.M., Dodi, G., Trandafir, L., Rezus, C., Rezus, E., Tamba, B.I. and Mihai, C.T., 2020. Nanomaterials designed for antiviral drug delivery transport across biological barriers.Pharmaceutics,12(2), p.171.
  • Dellink, R., Van der Mensbrugghe, D. and Saveyn, B., 2020. Shaping baseline scenarios of economic activity with CGE models: introduction to the special issue.Journal of Global Economic Analysis,5(1), pp.1-27.
  • Elwell-Sutton, T., Tinson, A., Greszczuk, C., Finch, D., Holt-White, E., Everest, G., Mihaylova, N., Wood, S. and Bibby, J., 2019. Creating healthy lives.A whole-government approach to long-term investment in the nation's health. London: The Health Foundation.
  • Freitag, C., Berners-Lee, M., Widdicks, K., Knowles, B., Blair, G. and Friday, A., 2021. The climate impact of ICT: A review of estimates, trends and regulations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.02622.
  • Geels, F.W. and Gregory, J., 2023. Low-carbon reorientation in a declining industry? A longitudinal analysis of coevolving contexts and company strategies in the UK steel industry (1988–2022).Energy Research & Social Science,96, p.102953.
  • Alison Holt & Ben Butcher, 2021. Thousands fewer receiving care. [Online]. [Available on]. :<>. [Assessed on 19/05/2023].
  • Alison Holt & Ben Butcher, 2021. Average weekly cost of care homes to local authorities. [Online]. [Available on]. :<>. [Assessed on 19/05/2023].
  • GOV.UK, 2022. Health and Social Care Levy to raise billions for NHS and social care. [Online]. [Available on]. :<>. [Assessed on 19/05/2023].
  • Heidari, A., Navimipour, N.J. and Unal, M., 2022. Applications of ML/DL in the management of smart cities and societies based on new trends in information technologies: A systematic literature review.Sustainable Cities and Society, p.104089.
  • Henriques, P.L., Matos, P.V. and Jerónimo, H.M., 2022. Eager to Develop Sustainable Business Ideas? Assessment through a New Business Plan (BP4S Model).Sustainability,14(2), p.1030.
  • Jasmine Jackson, 2021. NHS providing benefit to social care. [Online]. [Available on]. :<>. [Assessed on 19/05/2023].
  • Knapp, M. and Wong, G., 2020. Economics and mental health: the current scenario.World Psychiatry,19(1), pp.3-14.
  • Kuyken, W., Ball, S., Crane, C., Ganguli, P., Jones, B., Montero-Marin, J., Nuthall, E., Raja, A., Taylor, L., Tudor, K. and Viner, R.M., 2022. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of universal school-based mindfulness training compared with normal school provision in reducing risk of mental health problems and promoting well-being in adolescence: the MYRIAD cluster randomised controlled trial.BMJ Ment Health,25(3), pp.99-109.
  • Longva, K.K., Strand, Ø. and Pasquine, M., 2020. Entrepreneurship education as an arena for career reflection: the shift of students' career preferences after a business planning course.Education+ Training,62(7/8), pp.877-896.
  • Marczak, J., Wistow, G. and Fernandez, J.L., 2019. Evaluating social care prevention in England: Challenges and opportunities.Journal of Long-Term Care,2019, pp.206-217.
  • Meyer, M., Wiederkehr, I., Koldewey, C. and Dumitrescu, R., 2021. Understanding usage data-driven product planning: a systematic literature review.Proceedings of the Design Society,1, pp.3289-3298.
  • Paris, J.L., Baeza, A. and Vallet-Regí, M., 2019. Overcoming the stability, toxicity, and biodegradation challenges of tumor stimuli-responsive inorganic nanoparticles for delivery of cancer therapeutics.Expert opinion on drug delivery,16(10), pp.1095-1112.
  • Pritchard, R., 2022.Transformation through Participation and Accountability: Exploring alternative approaches to Value for Money in Development Assistance(Doctoral dissertation, Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington).
  • Ramadan, B.S., Rachman, I., Ikhlas, N., Kurniawan, S.B., Miftahadi, M.F. and Matsumoto, T., 2022. A comprehensive review of domestic-open waste burning: recent trends, methodology comparison, and factors assessment.Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management,24(5), pp.1633-1647.
  • Rizan, C., Reed, M. and Bhutta, M.F., 2021. Environmental impact of personal protective equipment distributed for use by health and social care services in England in the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,114(5), pp.250-263.
  • Rose, T.C., Daras, K., Manley, J., McKeown, M., Halliday, E., Goodwin, T.L., Hollingsworth, B. and Barr, B., 2023. The mental health and wellbeing impact of a Community Wealth Building programme in England: a difference-in-differences study.The Lancet Public Health.
  • Suh, E. and Holmes, L., 2022. A critical review of cost?effectiveness research in children's social care: What have we learnt so far?.Social Policy & Administration,56(5), pp.742-756.
  • Thomas, K.D., Remer, J., Primer, C., Bosnic, D., Butterworth, H., Rindahl, C., Foote, G., Droivoldsmo, A., Rindahl, G., McDonald, R. and Lawrie, S., 2020.Analysis and Planning Framework for Nuclear Plant Transformation(No. INL/EXT-20-59537). Idaho National Lab.(INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Xcel Energy, Inc., Minneapolis, MN (United States); Institute for Energy Technology (IFE), Kjeller (Norway); ScottMadden, Inc., Atlanta, GA (United States).
  • Tingey, M., Webb, J. and van der Horst, D., 2021. Housing retrofit: six types of local authority energy service models.Buildings and Cities,2(1).
  • Weber, R., 2021. Embedding futurity in urban governance: Redevelopment schemes and the time value of money.Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,53(3), pp.503-524.
  • Yang, C., O'Leary, S. and Tregidga, H., 2021. Social impact in accounting: is it at risk of becoming a hembig concept and does this matter?.Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management,18(3), pp.313-331.
  • Young, C.M., Quinn, C. and Trusheim, M.R., 2022. Durable cell and gene therapy potential patient and financial impact: US projections of product approvals, patients treated, and product revenues.Drug Discovery Today,27(1), pp.17-30.
  • Zafary, F., 2020. Implementation of business intelligence considering the role of information systems integration and enterprise resource planning.Journal of intelligence studies in business,1(1).
35% OFF
Get best price for your work
  • 54000+ Project Delivered
  • 500+ Experts 24*7 Online Help

offer valid for limited time only*