Design of New Tasmanian Railway Corridor Assignment Sample

Introduction of Design of New Tasmanian Railway Corridor Assignment

A new railway corridor is to be designed in this project. In doing this, the traffic on this route has been analysed. This corridor is going to connect places named “Townsville” & “Cairns”. There are three stations are also there between these places. These are “Innisfail”, “Tully”, and “Ingham”. The details of the design adopted are explained here.

24/7 support, expert writers, and fast delivery—New Assignment Help is your best choice for trusted Assignment Help in the UK.

Task 1

Trial 1

Figure 1: Train Movement in Trial 1

In the trial 1, the movement of traffic was determined.

Figure 2: Summary of Trial 1

On the basis of the data of the “traffic movement” of trial 1, a summary of trial 1 was prepared.

Figure 3: Diagram of Train Movement of Trial 1

The diagram showing the movement of trains is shown here for trial 1.

Trial 2

Figure 4: Train Movement in Trial 4

This is a revision of the trial 1. This shows the updated movement of trains on the corridor.

Figure 5: Summary of Trial 2

The summary of the movement of trains in trial 2, is shown here.

Figure 6: Diagram of Train Movement of Trial 2

The diagram showing the movement of the train in trial 2, is shown here.

Final Design

Figure 7: Final Train Crew Details

The final details of the crew for the railway corridor were prepared here. Each of the details of the crew can be obtained from the table shown above (Liu & Cao, 2020).

Figure 8: Final Train Table

Time table of the train movement that was finalised is shown here.

Figure 9: Final Train Movement Details

All the details of the movement of traffic along with the description of the movement are shown here. The details of the movement of all train types are present here (Jurković et al. 2021).

Figure 10: Summary of Final Design

The summary of the finalised design of the movement of trains between the stations in this corridor is given in the above image.

Figure 11: Diagram of Train Movement Final Design

A diagram showing the movement of trains through this cordor is shown here.

Task 2

Here, a comparison between two types of systems of signalling has been made. The name of these two types is “fixed block” & “moving block” signaling. The system of signalling is very important for a railway corridor design. This controls the movement of trains. Other than this, two types of turnouts are compared here. Turnout is the point of changing railway tracks. The names of the turnouts that are compared here are “traditional turnout” and “clawlock turnout”. These comparisons will gain the trust of the directors in adopting the new form of system of signalling.

Fixed Block Signaling

This can be considered as a system of signalling that has been used for a long time or in other words traditional signalling. This is a system that is placed beside the rail track (Sakanga et al. 2020). The tracks are divided into a number of parts. Each one of these parts is covered with signals and the decision is made whether a track is safe or not to be used by the train.

Features

• Division of the tracks in a number of parts. Every part can take one train at a particular time.
• The operators receive the signals regarding the condition of the railway parts present ahead.
• Because of the limitation of the track parts, there is a certain distance to be maintained between the trains which ultimately results in delay.

Diagram

Figure 12: Fixed Block Signaling

The image placed above shows the signalling system. It shows that block 1, is controlled by signal A. Similarly, block 2, is under the control of signal B. A train can only use a block at a particular time. 

Moving Block Signaling

This is an advancement of the above “signalling system”. This is because this system is more flexible in terms of the movement of trains. The principle of “fixed parts” is not utilised here (Alqatawna et al. 2022). Rather than this, the gap between the successive trains is being controlled speed of the trains.

Features

• This system enables the operators to move the trains with a much less gap between successive trains. This can be done because the system is able to calculate the distance between the trains that are safe to keep.
• Real-time monitoring of the trains can be done.
• Because of less gap between successive trans, more trains can run on a track.

Diagram

Figure 13: Moving Block Signaling

The diagram presented above shows that the gap between the successive trains is being controlled by the “signalling system”.

Turnout Comparison

Turnout is an important part of the “signalling system”. Here, the “clawlock turnout” has been selected over the traditional form of turnouts. The reason behind this selection can be understood from their features (Biancardo et al. 2021). These are illustrated here.

Traditional Turnout

• The use of mechanical links is observed here
• Better alignment is desired and is subjected to “mechanical failures”.
• The time of response is slow.

Clawlock Turnout

• Presence of a “locking mechanism” to control trains.
• Better safety and quick operation.

From this report, it can be identified that the “moving block” signals are better than the fixed signals in terms of better efficiency of operation and flexible changes. Hence, if this signal is used the the new corridor will be more efficient (Tetiranont et al. 2024). Other than this, there should also be change in the type of turnout. The “claw lock turnouts” provide better “operational efficiency” than the traditional turnout.

Conclusion

The report consists of the details of the designs that should be adopted in making the new “railway corridor”. It is selected after the analysis of the location, traffic and other details. In order to obtain the best results, there were three iterations were conducted. The third iteration was finalised. From the results, it is recommended that the “moving block” signalling system should be used for the new corridor. In addition to this, the “Clawlock Turnout” is suitable for this project.

Reference List

Journals

• Liu, Y. and Cao, C., 2020. A multi-objective train operational plan optimization approach for adding additional trains on a high-speed railway corridor in peak periods. Applied Sciences, 10(16), p.5554.
• Jurković, Ž., Hadzima-Nyarko, M. and Lovoković, D., 2021. Railway corridors in Croatian cities as factors of sustainable spatial and cultural development. Sustainability, 13(12), p.6928.
• Sakanga, L.M., Mwanaumo, E. and Thwala, W.D., 2020. Identification of variables proposed for inclusion into a regional railway corridor transportation economic regulatory framework: a case of the Southern African Development Community North-South Corridor. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 14(1), pp.1-11.
• Alqatawna, A., Sánchez-Cambronero, S., Gallego, I. and López-Morales, J.M., 2022. A Graphical Method for Designing the Horizontal Alignment and the Cant in High-Speed Railway Lines Aimed at Mixed-Speed Traffic. Sustainability, 14(14), p.8377.
• Tetiranont, S., Sadakorn, W., Rugkhapan, N.T. and Prasittisopin, L., 2024. Review of Sustainable Railway Station Design in Tropical Climate: Case of Thailand.
• Biancardo, S.A., Intignano, M., Viscione, N., Guerra De Oliveira, S. and Tibaut, A., 2021. Procedural Modeling‐Based BIM Approach for Railway Design. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021(1), p.8839362.

Author Bio

Ryan Kelle   6 years | MBA

Hi students. I am Ryan Kelle a London-based academic writer. I have been working in this for the last 6 years and helped hundreds of students finish their management papers. You can choose me for your management papers and I promise you the best results. The best part is I can work on short deadlines too.