Integrating Advanced Care Planning in Community Nursing for Dementia Falls Assignment Sample

Explore how integrating advanced care planning in community nursing enhances fall prevention for elderly dementia patients. Learn about strategies, policy influences, and multidisciplinary approaches Assignment Sample By New Assignment Help!

  • 72780+ Project Delivered
  • 500+ Experts 24x7 Online Help
  • No AI Generated Content
GET 35% OFF + EXTRA 10% OFF
- +
35% Off
£ 6.69
Estimated Cost
£ 4.35
39 Pages 9810 Words

Introduction: Strategies for Fall Prevention in Dementia Care Through ACP Integration

ACP is one of the strategic and important ways of introducing ACP into the community nursing setting to achieve better health outcomes while improving the quality of life for ageing individuals living with dementia (Ohr et al., 2021). Dementia is a chronic neural condition that causes cognitive functions such as memory, thinking, and performing daily chores to deteriorate progressively. The decline in cognitive function and physical capacity at old age makes them more prone to falls- the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in such a population group (Ohr et al., 2021).

Did You Like Our Samples From Our Delivered Work?
Connect With Us And Make It Yours In The Same Quality Order AI-FREE Content Best Assignment Help Website

Consequently, fall prevention is a key issue for consideration while managing senior citizens with dementia. Due to the fact that ACP is the first organized structure that combines diverse tools and techniques from various disciplines to form a unified system for the community nursing practice for the complex needs of the deprived population, which lacks a sober mindset, ACP brings in a multidimensional integrated character in the practice of community nursing. ACP covers more than basic medical care; it records and articulates patient's preferences for future healthcare, especially matters related to the terminal lifetime, in case they become incapable of making such decisions (Hafid et al., 2021). Such proactive and purposeful conduct ensures, therefore, that care adheres to the set values, goals and desires of the person thereby enhancing his /her autonomy and dignity (Hafid et al., 2021).

Aim

The primary aim of this project is to integrate Advanced Care Planning (ACP) within community nursing practices to enhance fall prevention strategies and improve the quality of life for elderly individuals with dementia.

Objectives

  • To implement effective tools within community nursing to identify elderly individuals with dementia who are at a heightened risk of falls, focusing on early detection and intervention.
  • To utilize ACP to tailor fall prevention strategies to the individual needs and preferences of elderly patients with dementia, ensuring these plans are person-centered and achievable.
  • To enhance the skills of community nurses in ACP conversations, empowering them to effectively communicate with patients and their families about fall risks and prevention strategies.
  • To conduct a thorough evaluation of the ACP integration into community nursing on reducing falls among elderly individuals with dementia

Literature Review

Assessing the Current State of Service

In judging the position of the current service regard to integrating Advanced Care Planning (ACP) into community nursing practices for stabilising fall prevention among elderly people having dementia, there are important inferences realize. However, today, the practices of community nursing still differ in the way they incorporate ACP with the absence of well-defined protocols and especially minispecific training to dementia care usually serving as the reason for this variation (Kuusisto et al., 2020). Although this is the case in some community nursing teams who are more proactive in exploring and documenting such preferences about care with patients and their families, this is not continuously evident in a lot of settings. In such a vulnerable group, the identification and management of fall risks are largely reactive instead of proactive with interventions arising post-incident to preventive measures.

In addition, several service gaps in care planning therapy personalization are noticed, with one-size-fits-all approach common in some cases, while it does not match the unique needs of the individuals suffering from dementia (Akil et al., 2021). The principles of using tools for assessment of fall risks as well as the misuse of these assessments are not consistently practiced, and little is known of how they can be actively used and altered to recognize the challenges faced by those with problems in cognition. Barriers in communication between providers, patients and families add to the difficulties associated with successful ACP implementation, depriving caregivers of multiple opportunities for meaningful discussion about future care preferences and strategies to avert a fall (Geerlings et al., 2023).

Root causes

Processes People Policies Procedures Environment Equipment
Cause 1 Lack of standardized ACP implementation protocols Insufficient training in dementia care Inconsistent healthcare policies regarding ACP Unclear procedures for initiating ACP discussions Home environment not assessed for fall risks Lack of adaptive devices for fall prevention
Cause 2 Variable engagement in ACP discussions among nurses Caregiver and family unawareness of ACP benefits Variations in policy support for ACP across regions Inadequate follow-up on ACP plans Inadequate community support structures Inadequate use of technology to monitor fall risks
Cause 3 Limited interdisciplinary collaboration Resistance to change among staff Lack of policy enforcement on ACP training Complexity of legal documents associated with ACP Lack of safety adaptations in community settings Insufficient investment in fall-prevention technology

Evidencing the Need for Change

Policy directives from organizations such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) suggest promoting the relative benefits of patient-centeredness through the provision of ACP (Blackwood, 2021). The NHS Long Term Plan underpins its strategy as one based on personalized care, including for dementia service users, thereby suggesting a high level of integration of ACP into care practice. Furthermore, economic evaluations show that improving fall prevention through the use of ACP can help reduce cost burdens to medical systems due to cutting costs on hospitalizations and the need for long-term care (Blackwood, 2021).

This integration assures not only to respond to the patient-preferred option and their quality of life, but also to bring out a tangible economic benefit in relation to the effective optimization the resource usage in the health care system. An important implication of the evidence syndromes is that there is a critical need for the shift toward a more individualized, preventive approach to dementia care, enabled by ACP and that this shift is supported by a body of evidence that these healthcare providers and policymakers need to take on board (Torous et al., 2021).

External and Internal Drivers for Change

National health care policies, for instance, the NHS Long Term Plan, highlight personalized care, decision-making by patients, and a comprehensive approach in applying services, primarily for the elderly with dementia (Entwistle et al., 2022). ACP is needed to follow laws regarding patient rights and standards regarding patient care, also it is important for people to follow the patient preferences and choices and the best interest of patients so older people have written legal documents that may be followed in future if problems appear. The recommendations which are based on practice evidence show the way in which the authoritative bodies including the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) can assist in fall prevention, dementia management, and screening. These guidelines support ACP, emphasizing the need to make interventions for individual needs; and promoting the importance of ACP in enhancing care results (Mills et al., 2023).

Projections by the UK suggest an even bigger increase in dementia cases by the year 2040, with the number of cases rising by 57% to 1.60 million people from the 2016 figure. This addition corresponds to about 70% of the level that would be real if the incidence rates per age group remained constant figures that estimated 1.2 million people with dementia in the UK in 2040 some 96,000 more. Moreover, projections indicate a population expansion regarding the people with dementia both able to live on their own and in need of complex care (Aranda et al., 2021).

If focusing on workforce capacities, outpatient care provisioned by primary care providers is an important service for elderly people (Henry and Loomis, 2023). In the United States, there are approximately 175,000 primary care physicians, in stark contrast to the much smaller numbers of specialized professionals: less than 10 thousand adult neurologists, less than 8 thousand geriatricians, and about 1,600 people practising geriatric psychiatry. These numbers fail to come anywhere near the demand with the American Geriatrics Society estimate putting this figure at need for 36,000 geriatricians alone (Henry and Loomis, 2023).

Role of Nurses in Change Management

From the standpoint of the labour force, the practicality of the breed gap, between gradually increasing the number of elderly patients with complex analytical needs and the available products of health care professionals, shows the need for creative models of care. For instance, in the United States, the number of primary care physicians is several times greater than the number of specialists practicing in geriatric medicine, neurology, and psychiatry, suggesting that carers of dementia patients may be disadvantaged with refined and more specific care (Ganguli et al., 2020). This pattern is reflected around the world, with estimates showing a notable rise in the prevalence of dementia, suggesting that in the United Kingdom, there will be over 1.2 million people suffering from dementia in the year 2040. Statistics such as the incidence of MSs across nations, and sizeable time-and-cost investments required in its prevention and management, not only disclose the enormity of the problem but underscore the importance of scalable and sustainable care strategies and systems across the globe (Ganguli et al., 2020).

Additionally, internal factors like organizational policies and procedures, employee training, and quality improvement projects as well as external factors such as health policies and guidelines, and reimbursement structures interact and contribute to the rate of integration of ACP (Coles et al., 2020). Advocacy through their experience acquired clinical skills and leadership, nurses influence this process in advocating for changes that are not only available for immediate health concerns, but they also represent the dignity and autonomy of individuals under their care (Berlin, 2022).

Proposed Change and Patient Benefits

The incorporation of ACP philosophy, which should be focused on the environments in which community nursing practices are taking place, particularly on the ways to prevent falling among elderly patients with dementia, represents an essential turning point towards a more patient-centered and proactive approach that involves patients from early stages of life preventing recurrence or sustaining long-term improvements (Mróz et al., 2023).

Though this method is limited to the physical protection, the advantages it provides exceed the protection borders. Even as ACP helps patients to make the choices for the future when their voice may be diminished in the future, this aspect is seen as the fundamental element, honoring autonomy in the patients' lives (Trang, Herbert and Sansom?Daly, 2022). In addition, ACP provides tremendous relief to the family and caregivers who have to make complex decisions regarding life support, but often find themselves confused about the patient's wishes (Malhotra et al., 2022).

The suggested development encourages a team of disciplines, shared care to use different professionals who are skilled in doing different tasks. The team-based model augmented the completeness of care, which means that in this approach, a patient's health and well-being are taken into consideration from all aspects (Zhao et al., 2023). Besides, the combination of ACP with community nursing contributes to the achievement of the goals of public health as well as ethical standards in medical practice that stresses the need to stimulate individual medical independence, ensure the parity of medical care, and act with respect to the limited medical resources (Li et al., 2022).

Literature Gap

The importance and integration of Advanced Care Planning (ACP) to community nursing practices, most especially dementia individuals dealing with fall prevention, have been made keenly known from the gaps noted in the current literature that need additional exploration and research (Coles et al., 2020). The lack of studies that delve into the applied aspects of ACP within the realm of community nursing is an obvious oversight, creating a grave gap in the recognizing of how such vital conversations may be best conducted and implemented into day-to-day nursing practice.

Vision and Goals

If the ACP is to be embedded within community nursing practices as a fall prevention intervention strategy for the aged people with dementia, vision and goals are vital to plot a straight course for the project as purposed to achieve its goals consistent with other organizational goals. A vision statement well defined, like the beacon, leads all project related activities as they try to unite with a common goal. In the creation of this project, the vision might coincide with the overall ambitions of a health institution, such as the NHS Trust, in such regard, to include patient safety, quality of care, and conforming to the Trust's Vision and Values statement.

Vision Statement

"To revolutionize dementia care within our community by seamlessly integrating Advanced Care Planning into nursing practices, thereby setting a new standard for patient-centered care.”

SMART Goals

Specific Measurable Achievable Relevant Time-bound
1 Integrate ACP discussions as a standard part of care for all elderly dementia patients within community nursing practices. Number of ACP discussions documented in patient care plans. Develop and distribute ACP guidelines and resources to all community nurses. Ensures care is aligned with patient preferences and improves safety for dementia patients. To be fully implemented by the end of the first quarter following project initiation.
2 Reduce the incidence of falls in elderly dementia patients by 25% within the first year of ACP integration. Percentage reduction in reported falls among the target patient group. Implement fall risk assessments and preventive measures as part of the ACP process. Directly impacts patient well-being by minimizing one of the most common and severe risks. Goal to be achieved within one year of initiating the ACP integration process.
3 Train 100% of community nursing staff in ACP and fall prevention strategies within 6 months. Percentage of nursing staff who have completed ACP and fall prevention training. Conduct regular ACP and fall prevention workshops and training sessions for nursing staff. Enhances staff competence and confidence in providing specialized dementia care. Training to be completed within the first six months of the project.
4 Establish a multidisciplinary team approach for at least 90% of care plans involving elderly dementia patients within 9 months. Percentage of patient care plans developed with a multidisciplinary team. Formalize collaboration protocols between nursing, therapy, and medical staff. Promotes comprehensive care planning that addresses the complex needs of dementia patients. To be established within nine months of the project start date.

Discussion

Examine transformational leadership and its impact on change management

Transformational leadership significantly influences change management because it encourages its followers to go beyond individual needs for the sake of the organization (Peng et al., 2020). This leader is one who can be able to articulate the future in that way the vision is clear and definable the reason being that individuals can be able to pursue a common goal. Transformational leaders perform well in creating that work culture of trust and respect, not only that employee's engagement hikes but encouraging employees to participate in the change on their own (Siangchokyoo, Klinger and Campion, 2019). Additionally, transformational leaders foster creativity and innovation in their followers; they question current mindsets and evaluation within the group. Besides change management, this culture of innovation is important so that organizations can adapt and branch out in response to outside conditions and possibilities (Shafi et al., 2020).

Discuss the application of models such as Kotter's 8-Step Change Model

Kotter's 8- Step Change Model is an expansive structure created for the purpose of promoting and ensuring effective organizational change process (Laig and Abocejo, 2021). It starts off with creating a sense of crisis urgency relative to the desired change- which pulls or drives the necessary loyalties and encouragement from the influential stakeholders. This sense of urgency is instrumental in the process of overcoming complacency and helping to gain the required speed in the right direction (Laig and Abocejo, 2021). Vison communication is the step four communicates the reasons for the change and what is in it for the people who are the members of the organization hence they become part and parcel of the process (Errida and Lotfi, 2021).

Step five in the model underscores empowering the broad-based action by removing the factors creating resistance to change and enabling the individuals to contribute to the change process (Kang et al., 2020). This last stage makes sure that the change operates through the rhizomatic model and not the surface (Kang et al., 2020).

Outline the steps in the delivery plan, including timelines, goals, and specific interventions

Step Timeline Goals Specific Interventions
Establish Urgency Month 1-2 Create awareness of the need for change in fall prevention strategies. Conduct initial assessments, surveys, and meetings to highlight current gaps.
Form Coalition Month 2-3 Assemble a team of key stakeholders committed to change. Organize workshops and meetings to form the coalition and define roles.
Develop Vision & Strategy Month 3-4 Outline a clear vision and strategy for integrating ACP into nursing practices. Develop training materials and strategic plans for ACP implementation.
Communicate the Vision Month 4-5 Ensure all staff understand the vision and their role in the change process. Launch a communication campaign using emails, workshops, and meetings.
Empower Broad-Based Action Month 5-7 Identify and remove barriers to change, facilitating staff engagement in ACP. Review policies, provide training, and support to staff for empowerment.
Generate Short-Term Wins Month 8-10 Implement pilot projects to demonstrate the benefits of ACP in fall prevention. Start with pilot areas, monitor progress, and celebrate early successes.
Consolidate Gains Month 11-12 Use early successes to motivate further change and integrate new practices. Expand the program based on pilot results, adjust strategies as needed.
Anchor New Approaches in Culture Year 1-2 Ensure the changes made are sustained and become part of the organizational culture. Incorporate ACP practices into standard operating procedures and training

Systematically review potential risks and challenges in implementing ACP and fall prevention strategies

The implementation of ACP and fall prevention strategies in Agyeidi and Beyer's community nursing model applied to elderly persons with dementia involved a set of risks and challenges that required thoughtful assessment and tactful addressing (Albasha et al., 2022).

A number of training and education gaps in the nursing staff awareness and competence and suboptimal implementation of ACP and/or fall prevention measures can be considered another major challenge (Pivodic et al., 2022). The trainees must be trained well to make sure that the organization's appropriate skills and knowledge are passed in their minds. Stakeholder engagement is equally important since without inclusion of all parties involved in the ACP process, their active participation, families' involvement, caregivers, and patients, care plans would lack their wishes and the required support of their families, pointing to the necessity of strategies for meaningful participation (Pilch et al., 2021). Moreover, interdisciplinary teamwork is of utmost importance to prevent diverse manifestations of various falls and whole as well coordinated approach to the detection of that problem, which implies more integrated situations communicated among all members of the health care group (Pilch et al., 2021). Implementation is rendered difficult by the lack of economic capabilities, and the proper application of these initiatives requires good resource management as well as the organisational support needed to prioritise these initiatives (Budhwar et al., 2023).

Discuss the need for iterative improvements based on evaluation outcomes

New approaches to the healthcare management along with the patient requirements change over time (Wager, Lee and Glaser, 2021). Iterative improvements allow adopting ACP and fall prevention methods to new challenges as well as additional insights about elderly patients with dementia for the transition to further developed forms of these technologies over time. This guarantees that the interventions carry credibility to the latest formulations of clinical evidence and best practices (Wager, Lee and Glaser, 2021).

The implementation of continuous evaluation gives important information on the underlying effect that planned strategies have on performance (Carayon et al., 2020). Emerging through response to feedback comments of patients, families, and clinicians manifest themselves (van der Schaar et al., 2020).

This responsiveness facilitates stakeholder involvement and improved satisfaction since they are convinced that their inputs result into professionals implementing tangible modifications and improvements in the care process. When a change takes place in any healthcare practice such as the introduction of ACP as well as strategies for fall prevention despite the fact that all changes are for the benefit of the people, it is likely to have unintentional effects. The iterative progress rejects both negative changes in patient care or disruptions in the staff's workload for the healthcare system (Johnson et al., 2020).. Through the pursuit of iterative enhancements, these healthcare institutions maintain the efficiency of resource utilization (Mahajan et al., 2022).

Stakeholders and the Project Management Team

Role Contribution Reason for Involvement
Patients and Families Provide insights into care preferences. Crucial for tailoring patient-centered interventions.
Community Nurses Offer frontline implementation insights. Essential for practical execution and feedback.
Physicians and Specialists Provide medical expertise. Supports comprehensive care planning.
Healthcare Administrators Offer organizational oversight. Essential for resource allocation and policy support.
Policy Makers and Regulators Provide guidelines and regulatory frameworks. Critical for ensuring compliance and alignment.
Research and Academic Institutions Contribute evidence-based insights. Guides effective strategy development.
Project Manager Oversees project planning and execution. Ensures project remains on track.
Clinical Lead Provides clinical oversight. Garner trust and facilitate adoption among staff.
Training Coordinator Develops and implements training programs. Builds staff capacity for successful implementation.
Quality Improvement Specialist Monitors outcomes and implements quality measures. Vital for continuous improvement.
Community Outreach Coordinator Facilitates community engagement. Enhances project relevance and acceptance.

Analysis

Route Cause Analysis

In principle, RCA is dedicated to finding the root causes of reported incidents that tend to occur in the healthcare system, as well as other industries, after-all the emphasis on finding out the said causes is on what is driving the incident right down to addressing the roots of the same- instead of simply managing the said symptoms (CPPS and P.Eng, 2021). From a human resources point of view, especially if we analyze the implications of RCA in healthcare, as a part of projects centred on integrating the approaches of ACP and fall prevention for elderly individuals, those that suffer from the individual dementia develop a strategic importance (CPPS and P.Eng, 2021). It starts off with the realization of a situation that is sometimes in the form of an unforeseen trend or problem such that falls among patients are higher than normal or that ACP protocols are not being implemented properly. The RCA process then goes a few levels further to analyze how and why this event occurred, using tools such as the fishbone diagram to map out factors at play in different domains such as the process, people, policies, procedures, environment, and equipment which could have led or contributed to the actual event (Holifahtus Sakdiyah, Eltivia and Afandi, 2022).

RCA analyzes the problem-generating event and its contributory elements by dissecting it in a systemic manner and one can find not only a single but several root causes that dialectically interact in creating the problem (SET?AWAN et al., 2020). This comprehensive analysis is put in place to ensure that the interventions are the necessary steps to the cause of the problem vice the short cuts. For example, if communication breakdowns between the staff and families about an ACP turn out to be a powerful contributing factor, the solution covering not only better training of the staff, but also establishing new informational resources for the families and how they can negotiate with staff (Madariaga, 2020).

5 ‘whys'

Why # Question Root Cause
Why 1 Why are fall rates not decreasing among elderly dementia patients despite implementing ACP and fall prevention strategies? The strategies are not being effectively executed.
Why 2 Why are the implemented strategies not effectively executed? There is a lack of adherence to the protocols by the nursing staff.
Why 3 Why is there a lack of adherence to the fall prevention protocols by the nursing staff? The nursing staff has not been fully trained on the new protocols.
Why 4 Why hasn't the nursing staff been fully trained on the new protocols? Training sessions on the new protocols were not prioritized or adequately resourced.
Why 5 Why were training sessions on the new protocols not prioritized or adequately resourced? Insufficient allocation of resources towards staff education and training reflects a broader issue of resource distribution and prioritization within the healthcare setting.

Process Mapping

Step Description Inputs Outputs
Patient Identification Identify elderly patients with dementia who are at risk of falls. Patient records, risk assessment tools. List of at-risk patients.
Initial Assessment Conduct comprehensive assessments including health status, fall history, and living environment. Assessment forms, interviews with patients and families. Assessment reports highlighting fall risks.
ACP Discussion Initiation Initiate discussions with patients and families about ACP, focusing on fall prevention. ACP guidelines, patient and family preferences. Documented ACP preferences, care wishes.
Care Planning Develop personalized care plans incorporating ACP decisions and fall prevention strategies. ACP documentation, assessment reports. Personalized care plans.
Implementation of Care Plan Implement the care plan, including specific fall prevention interventions. Care plans, intervention protocols. Implemented interventions, modified patient environments.
Training and Education Provide training for nursing staff and education for patients/families on fall prevention. Training materials, educational resources. Trained staff, informed patients and families.
Monitoring and Evaluation Regularly monitor the patient's environment, health status, and adherence to the care plan; evaluate the effectiveness of fall prevention strategies. Monitoring tools, evaluation criteria. Monitoring reports, evaluation outcomes.
Feedback and Iterative Improvement Use feedback from monitoring and evaluation to make iterative improvements to care plans and interventions. Feedback reports, evaluation outcomes. Updated care plans, improved interventions.
Sustainability and Integration Ensure that ACP and fall prevention strategies are sustainably integrated into routine care practices. Updated protocols, staff training. Standardized care practices, ongoing staff competency.

Lewin`s 3 step model

Unfreeze: In the first place, this essential stage involves readying the organization for change, which must bring down hegemony and dismantle the current status quo.

Change (Transition): The development of a way out and the ‘unfreezing' of organization and its acceptance to change obliges to move forward towards the new method of operating. The adoption stage refers to using ACP and fall prevention schemes in the routines of everyday tasks for community nursing practices.

Refreeze: The goal of the last step is to sustain the organization after the change has occurred because of a revision in the standard operating procedure that is done by establishing the new practices. This suggests that in the form of ACP and fall prevention integration, this should mean that the new techniques become fully part and parcel of organizational culture and that employees practice these methods on a consistent basis.

Interaction of Needs model

The Interaction of Needs model, developed by researchers specializing in organizational behaviour and psychology, provides a paradigm to comprehend the relationship and dynamic interaction between the various needs of the different stakeholders within an organization and how different needs influence the process of change and the process of coming up with coherent decisions. Although the model was not specifically designed for healthcare but rather for all business environments, it presents a great potential to implement projects and programs such as the integration of ACP and strategies for fall prevention initiatives in with integrated focus on patients, professionals, and organizational needs.

The basis of the Interaction of Needs model is drawing the main attention to the dynamic dialectical relationship between individual and societal needs. In regards to health care this model can clarify how the needs of the old patients with dementia e.g. safety, autonomy, and dignity, the professional needs of the nurses and other health care providers e.g training, support and effective interventions and the organizational needs love for compliance, efficiency and good outcome of health care need can intersect to some extent.

Kotter`s 8 step model of change

Step Application
1. Establish a Sense of Urgency Highlight the importance of ACP and fall prevention to address urgent safety concerns for elderly dementia patients.
2. Form a Powerful Coalition Gather a group of committed leaders and stakeholders from various disciplines to guide the change.
3. Create a Vision for Change Develop a clear and compelling vision that integrates ACP and fall prevention into nursing practices.
4. Communicate the Vision Use multiple forums and methods to communicate the change vision clearly and persuasively to all staff.
5. Empower Others to Act on the Vision Remove obstacles to change, change systems or structures undermining the vision, and encourage risk-taking and creative problem-solving.
6. Generate Short-term Wins Plan for and create visible improvements as evidence that the changes are making a difference in fall prevention.
7. Consolidate Gains and Produce More Change Use increased credibility from short-term wins to change systems, structures, and policies that don't fit the vision; hire, promote, and develop employees who can implement the vision.
8. Anchor New Approaches in the Culture Articulate the connections between the new behaviors and organizational success, and develop the means to ensure leadership development and succession.

NHS Change Model

Implementing a project such as aligning Advanced Care Planning (ACP) and fall prevention – approaches in community nursing practices based on the NHS Change Model will entail bringing these eight elements to fit within the particular settings and difficulties of the project (Wright, Gabbay and May, 2021). For instance, forming a shared mission to ensure the quality of life and protection lifestyles for senior patients with Alzheimer's condition brings the stakeholders around the same goal. An effective leadership on different fields can promote the fact that ACP and fall prevention are critical, and it will also be possible to engage the front line staff, patients and their families to make the change process more open (Oh et al., 2021).

Communication of best practices in care plans and fall prevention can lead to innovations being shared, and in promoting transparency in measurement, it is easy to track the interventions applied (Dykes et al., 2020). The first human structure that matches the project objectives of system drivers in terms of timing, allocation of resources and securing organizational support is inside. A second one, grounded in building capacity and capability among staff members, enables staff to carry out the necessary change (Mikalef, van de Wetering and Krogstie, 2020). Lastly, applying a real-time learning approach guarantees that the project will be able to respond to challenges and feedback allowing it to make permanent adjustments as it relates to the care of the patients.

Risk Management and Mitigation

Risk management analysis

Step Description
1. Risk Identification Identify potential risks related to the project.
2. Risk Assessment Assess the likelihood and impact of each identified risk.
3. Risk Prioritization Prioritize risks based on their likelihood and impact ratings.
4. Risk Mitigation Develop strategies to mitigate or manage identified risks.
5. Contingency Planning Create contingency plans for high-priority risks with predefined actions.
6. Monitoring and Review Continuously monitor project progress and review risk status.
7. Communication Transparently communicate risks and mitigation efforts to stakeholders.
8. Documentation Maintain records of risk assessments, mitigation strategies, and actions.
9. Regular Reporting Provide regular updates on risk management to stakeholders.
10. Lessons Learned Conduct post-project lessons-learned sessions for future improvement.

Risk management cycle and 4 step Risk Management framework

Step Description Activities Output
1. Risk Identification Identify potential risks affecting the project/organization. - Brainstorming - Risk checklists - Historical data analysis - Expert opinions List of identified risks with descriptions.
2. Risk Assessment Assess risk significance and potential impact. - Assess likelihood - Assess impact - Categorize risks based on likelihood and impact Prioritized list of risks categorized as low, medium, or high risk.
3. Risk Mitigation Develop strategies to reduce risk impact or likelihood. - Create mitigation plans - Define specific actions for high-priority risks Detailed risk mitigation plans.
4. Risk Monitoring and Review Continuously monitor and assess risk status. - Regular reviews - Track changes in risk status - Adjust mitigation plans Updated risk status reports and adjusted mitigation strategies.

Plan Do Study Act (PDSA Cycle)

PDSA Cycle Step Description Activities SMART Goals/Counter Measures Responsibilities Monitoring Progress and Achievement Risk Management Resources Needed
Plan Introduce the project idea into practice. - Develop a clear implementation plan. - Identify key stakeholders and project management team. - Define SMART goals and countermeasures. - Allocate responsibilities. - Identify required resources. - SMART Goal 1: Achieve 80% staff training completion in ACP and fall prevention protocols within 6 months. - SMART Goal 2: Reduce fall-related incidents in elderly dementia patients by 20% within the first year. - Project Manager: Overall project oversight. - Nursing Leads: Implementation in nursing practices. - Training Coordinator: Organizing staff training. - Risk Manager: Identifying and managing risks. - Regular progress reviews and milestone tracking. - Quarterly assessment of SMART goals. - Feedback from nursing staff and patients. - Regular risk assessments and updates. - Identification of new risks and mitigation plans. - Personnel for training - Training materials - Time for staff training - Budget for implementation
Do Implement the project in practice. - Execute the implementation plan. - Conduct staff training on ACP and fall prevention. - Begin integrating ACP and fall prevention into nursing practices. - Ensure all staff complete training on schedule. - Begin implementing ACP discussions and fall prevention protocols. - Nursing Leads: Supervising implementation. - Training Coordinator: Conducting training sessions. - Nursing Staff: Applying ACP and fall prevention in practice. - Monitor training completion rates. - Track initial ACP discussions and fall prevention adherence. - Address any immediate challenges/barriers. - Identify barriers to implementation. - Address any immediate risks. - Trainers and training materials - Necessary equipment and supplies
Study Evaluate the success of the project. - Monitor progress and outcomes based on SMART goals. - Gather data through surveys, feedback, and incident reports. - Analyze outcomes compared to initial expectations. - Compare training completion rates to the target of 80%. - Analyze fall-related incident data for reductions. - Survey nursing staff for feedback. - Data Analyst: Analyzing data. - Project Manager: Reviewing progress. - Nursing Leads: Collecting feedback. - Evaluate if SMART goals are met. - Identify any deviations from expected outcomes. - Assess staff satisfaction and engagement. - Identify potential risks or challenges arising from the evaluation. - Data analysis tools - Survey tools
Act Make informed decisions based on evaluation. - Determine if SMART goals are achieved. - Review feedback and incident data. - Decide to continue, modify, or terminate the project. - Implement changes or improvements as needed. - If SMART goals are met, continue implementation with ongoing monitoring. - If goals are not met, assess reasons and modify the project plan accordingly. - Project Manager: Decision-maker based on evaluation. - Nursing Leads: Implement changes. - Risk Manager: Identify and address risks. - Implement modifications or improvements as needed. - Plan for ongoing monitoring and evaluation. - Identify new risks that may arise from project modifications. - Adjusted budget if changes are necessary

Evaluation Methods

The management of a project should be the one that is proactive on a process of appraisal would start at the implementation and undertaken throughout the project (Subramanian and Suresh, 2022). To assess them all is vital to make sure that the successful completion project and find the following points where changes can be made. A startling fact that over 70% of change management projects fail points to the need for pre-, inter-, and post-project evaluation at all stages.

Flat 35% Discount on your first order!
& Extra 10% OFF on your WhatsApp order!
Place Order Now Live Chat Whatsapp Order

At the beginning of the transformation, it is important to carry out an integrated needs assessment for comprehensive understanding of the existing situation regarding ACP and advanced fall prevention in the community practice as nursing (Cerulus, Bossuyt and Vanderhaeghen, 2021). For this evaluation, a literature survey is done as well as the study is engaged in analysing data retrieved sources. With that in mind, we can realize what have to be done to change and what has to be changed, which further sets the tone for planning and implementation.

Another important aspect of the evaluation process that must be considered alongside the methods of evaluation is stakeholder engagement (Bahadorestani, Naderpajouh and Sadiq, 2020). Survey and Focus group techniques are used to gather feedback from nursing staffs, patients, and other parties for checkpointing perception and expectations. Their insights are a fundamental part of determining the direction that the project will take, as well as ensuring that it meets their requirements and expectations.

Conclusions and Recommendations for Practice

Conclusion

The project was meant to solve a significant gap in community nursing deliverables by incorporating ACP and fall intervention approaches for elderly patients with dementia. The prevalence for dementia, nevertheless in healthcare, is progressing because the dementia number is estimated to go up by 57% from 2016 to 2040, in the UK. This turn makes it a necessity to apply the proactive strategy that will improve the quality of presented care to this mentioned group of patients. The project was originally initiated with an in-depth evaluation forming information on the current status of service, which revealed a significant difference in ACP and fall prevention care. This gap was identified through a literature review, healthcare policy analysis, and the analysis of factors that drive the change in the organization's environment. Nurses are the key drivers of change management processes because the role given to them in these processes was regarded as essential to the success of the processes.

The proposal for change was designed in a quality way, and it was intended to alleviate these gaps and improve outcomes from patients. Four operational goals were sought out to serve as a direction of the project, which targeted staff education, preventative measures and patient safety, and ACP conversations. A rigorous systematic approach was followed throughout the project, and it was based on the PDSA cycle which it follows the plan, do, study, act. During the implementation phase, activities included staff training on intervention policies, integrating ACP and Fall prevention protocols into nursing practices, and continuous monitoring of progress.

Recommendations

To improve the adoption of ACP and measures to prevent falls in elderly individuals with dementia in the community nursing practice three key recommendations have been developed (Frechman et al., 2020). Holistic care approach, among others, is fundamental. This strategy acknowledges that dementia care also involves complex domains of social, economic, and mental well-being and fall prevention (Quinn et al., 2021). It gives equal focus on the psychosomatic aspect of patients. Viewed holistically, healthcare providers develop a person-centered care that enriches the health and life of the elderly person with dementia in turn.

Furthermore, ongoing educational and learning modules offered to nursing personnel must be adopted. These recordings guarantee that the workforce remains current about the most recent ACP or fall avoidance life systems. Since healthcare procedures become outdated with time, maintaining staff awareness and skilled becomes significant as the changing needs of patients necessitate new standards of care. The regular sessions enable the nursing staff becomes in a position to change and implement evidence-based responses efficiently (Rodriguez (Then) et al., 2020).

References

  • Akil, A.A.-S., Yassin, E., Al-Maraghi, A., Aliyev, E., Al-Malki, K. and Fakhro, K.A. (2021). Diagnosis and treatment of type 1 diabetes at the dawn of the personalized medicine era. Journal of Translational Medicine, [online] 19(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02778-6.
  • Albasha, N., McCullagh, R., Cornally, N., McHugh, S. and Timmons, S. (2022). Implementation strategies supporting fall prevention interventions in a long-term care facility for older persons: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open, 12(5), p.e055149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055149.
  • Aranda, M.P., Kremer, I.N., Hinton, L., Zissimopoulos, J., Whitmer, R.A., Hummel, C.H., Trejo, L. and Fabius, C. (2021). Impact of dementia: Health disparities, population trends, care interventions, and economic costs. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 69(7), pp.1774–1783. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17345.
  • Bahadorestani, A., Naderpajouh, N. and Sadiq, R. (2020). Planning for sustainable stakeholder engagement based on the assessment of conflicting interests in projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, [online] 242(1), p.118402. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965261933272X.
  • Barteit, S., Lanfermann, L., Bärnighausen, T., Neuhann, F. and Beiersmann, C. (2021). Augmented, Mixed and Virtual Reality-based Head-Mounted Devices for Medical Education: A Systematic Review (Preprint). JMIR Serious Games, 9(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/29080.
  • Berlin, P. (2022). Readiness for the end of Life: Importance of Death Anxiety, Assessment and Interventions in Cancer Care. [online] archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de. Available at: https://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/diss/z2022/0475 [Accessed 2 Feb. 2024].
  • Bernard, C., Tan, A., Slaven, M., Elston, D., Heyland, D.K. and Howard, M. (2020). Exploring patient-reported barriers to advance care planning in family practice. BMC Family Practice, [online] 21(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01167-0.
  • Blackwood, D.H. (2021). Views and Practices of Anaesthetists Towards End of Life Decisions and Advance Care Planning. [online] discovery.ucl.ac.uk. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10126799/ [Accessed 2 Feb. 2024].
  • Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G.J., Beltran, J.R., Boselie, P., Fang Lee Cooke, Decker, S., DeNisi, A., Prasanta Kumar Dey, Guest, D., Knoblich, A.J., Malik, A., Paauwe, J., Savvas Papagiannidis, Patel, C., Pereira, V., Ren, S. and Rogelberg, S. (2023). Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT, [online] 33(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12524.
  • Carayon, P., Wooldridge, A., Hoonakker, P., Hundt, A.S. and Kelly, M.M. (2020). SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety. Applied Ergonomics, 84(84), p.103033. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033.
  • Cerulus, M., Bossuyt, I. and Vanderhaeghen, B. (2021). An integrative literature review of the implementation of advance care planning in hospital settings. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 6(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15835.
  • Coles, E., Anderson, J., Maxwell, M., Harris, F.M., Gray, N.M., Milner, G. and MacGillivray, S. (2020). The Influence of Contextual Factors on Healthcare Quality Improvement initiatives: a Realist Review. Systematic Reviews, [online] 9(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01344-3.
  • CPPS, D.A. and P.Eng, H.P. (2021). Root Cause Analysis (RCA) for the Improvement of Healthcare Systems and Patient Safety. [online] Google Books. CRC Press. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=60k2EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=RCA+is+dedicated+to+finding+the+root+causes+of+reported+incidents+that+tend+to+occur+in+the+healthcare+system [Accessed 2 Feb. 2024].
  • Dykes, P.C., Burns, Z., Adelman, J., Benneyan, J., Bogaisky, M., Carter, E., Ergai, A., Lindros, M.E., Lipsitz, S.R., Scanlan, M., Shaykevich, S. and Bates, D.W. (2020). Evaluation of a patient-centered fall-prevention tool kit to reduce falls and injuries. JAMA Network Open, 3(11), pp.1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25889.
  • Entwistle, V.A., Cribb, A., Mitchell, P. and Walter, S. (2022). Unifying and Universalising Personalised Care? An Analysis of a National Curriculum With Implications for Policy and Education Relating to Person-centred Care. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(12). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2022.07.003.
  • Errida, A. and Lotfi, B. (2021). The Determinants of Organizational Change Management Success: Literature Review and Case Study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, [online] 13(1), pp.1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211016273.
  • Frechman, E., Dietrich, M.S., Walden, R.L. and Maxwell, C.A. (2020). Exploring the Uptake of Advance Care Planning in Older Adults: An Integrative Review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, [online] 60(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.043.
  • Ganguli, I., Shi, Z., Orav, E.J., Rao, A., Ray, K.N. and Mehrotra, A. (2020). Declining Use of Primary Care Among Commercially Insured Adults in the United States, 2008–2016. Annals of Internal Medicine, [online] 172(4), p.240. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-1834.
  • Geerlings, A.D., Janssen Daalen, J.M., Ypinga, J.H.L., Bloem, B.R., Meinders, M.J., Munneke, M. and Darweesh, S.K.L. (2023). Case management interventions in chronic disease reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 18(4), p.e0282590. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282590.
  • Hafid, A., Howard, M., Guenter, D., Elston, D., Fikree, S., Gallagher, E., Winemaker, S. and Waters, H. (2021). Advance care planning conversations in primary care: a quality improvement project using the Serious Illness Care Program. BMC palliative care, [online] 20(1), p.122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00817-z.
  • Henry, C. and Loomis, J.M. (2023). Healthcare as asset: Private equity investment and the changing geographies of care in the United States. Geoforum, [online] 146(4), p.103866. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103866.
  • Holifahtus Sakdiyah, S., Eltivia, N. and Afandi, A. (2022). Root Cause Analysis Using Fishbone Diagram: Company Management Decision Making. Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research, 1(6), pp.566–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v1i6.103.
  • Johnson, K.B., Wei, W., Weeraratne, D., Frisse, M.E., Misulis, K., Rhee, K., Zhao, J. and Snowdon, J.L. (2020). Precision Medicine, AI, and the Future of Personalized Health Care. Clinical and Translational Science, [online] 14(1). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877825/.
  • Kang, S.P., Chen, Y., Svihla, V., Gallup, A., Ferris, K. and Datye, A.K. (2020). Guiding change in higher education: an emergent, iterative application of Kotter's change model. Studies in Higher Education, 47(2), pp.1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1741540.
  • Kuusisto, A., Santavirta, J., Saranto, K., Korhonen, P. and Haavisto, E. (2020). Advance care planning for patients with cancer in palliative care: A scoping review from a professional perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(13-14), pp.2069–2082. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15216.
  • Laig, R. and Abocejo, F. (2021). Change Management Process in a Mining Company: Kotter's 8-Step Change Model. [online] jomeino.com. Available at: https://jomeino.com/sites/default/files/paper_attachment/Change%20Management%20Project%20in%20a%20Mining%20Company.pdf.
  • Li, M., Ao, Y., Deng, S., Peng, P., Chen, S., Wang, T., Martek, I. and Bahmani, H. (2022). A Scoping Literature Review of Rural Institutional Elder Care. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), p.10319. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610319.
  • Madariaga, A. (2020). Neoliberal Resilience: Lessons in Democracy and Development from Latin America and Eastern Europe. [online] Google Books. Princeton University Press. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2PfkDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP9&dq=RCA+analyzes+the+problem-generating+event+&ots=WEiVqSNYLC&sig=A37cm4D1vonJffF3uQd8FP9zZmc [Accessed 2 Feb. 2024].
  • Mahajan, H.B., Rashid, A.S., Junnarkar, A.A., Uke, N., Deshpande, S.D., Futane, P.R., Alkhayyat, A. and Alhayani, B. (2022). Integration of Healthcare 4.0 and blockchain into secure cloud-based electronic health records systems. Applied Nanoscience, 6(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-021-02164-0.
  • Malhotra, C., Huynh, V.A., Shafiq, M. and Batcagan-Abueg, A.P.M. (2022). Advance care planning and caregiver outcomes: intervention efficacy – systematic review. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 6(7), p.bmjspcare-2021-003488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2021-003488.
  • Meyer, C., Ogrin, R., Golenko, X., Cyarto, E., Paine, K., Walsh, W., Hutchinson, A. and Lowthian, J. (2022). A codesigned fit?for?purpose implementation framework for aged care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13660.
  • Mikalef, P., van de Wetering, R. and Krogstie, J. (2020). Building dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics: The role of organizational inertia. Information & Management, 58(6), p.103412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103412.
  • Mills, I., Scambler, S., Neville, P. and Asimakopoulou, K. (2023). Developing a person-centred approach in dentistry beyond NHS recall intervals: a commentary. British Dental Journal, [online] 235(1), pp.24–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6009-0.
  • Mishra, G., Hardy, R. and Kuh, D. (2023). A Life Course Approach to Women's Health. [online] Google Books. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=xhLIEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA73&dq=Life+course+is+an+important+aspect+when+it+comes+to+the+understanding+of+risk+for+example+midlife+obesity+and+high+blood+pressure+is+an+indicators+of+a+problem&ots=fnyeoLz89s&sig=ulPXsUfix5iwrleKEK-bHoV4Ass [Accessed 2 Feb. 2024].
  • Mróz, L., Shimae Soheilipour, Siden, E., Carter, R.Z., Kryworuchko, J., Sawatzky, R., Husband, A., Stajduhar, K., Barwich, D. and Hassan, E. (2023). ‘Now I get what's important' - Shifting philosophies of hospice society staff and trained volunteers involved in peer-facilitated Advance Care Planning workshops for the public. Patient Education and Counseling, 115(7), pp.107925–107925. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.107925.
  • Oh, A., Allison, T.A., Mahoney, K., Thompson, N., Ritchie, C.S., Sudore, R.L. and Harrison, K.L. (2021). Front-Line Hospice Staff Perceptions of Barriers and Opportunities to Discussing Advance Care Planning With Hospice Patients and Their Families. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 5(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.07.014.
  • Ohr, S.O., Cleasby, P., Jeong, S.Y.-S. and Barrett, T. (2021). Nurse-led normalised advance care planning service in hospital and community health settings: a qualitative study. BMC Palliative Care, 20(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00835-x.
  • Peng, J., Li, M., Wang, Z. and Lin, Y. (2020). Transformational leadership and employees' reactions to organizational change: Evidence from a meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(3), pp.369–397.
  • Pilch, M., Lunt, V., May, P., Mockler, D., Thomas, S. and Doyle, F. (2021). Facilitators and barriers to stakeholder engagement in advance care planning for older adults in community settings: a hybrid systematic review protocol. HRB Open Research, 3(4), p.38. doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13082.2.
  • Pivodic, L., Annelien Wendrich-van Dael, Gilissen, J., Stefanie De Buyser, Luc Deliens, Gastmans, C., Robert Vander Stichele and Van (2022). Effects of a theory-based advance care planning intervention for nursing homes: A cluster randomized controlled trial. journals.sagepub.com, 36(7), pp.1059–1071. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163221102000.
  • Punia, H. (2020). The Role of Nurses in Advance Care Planning Within Long-Term Care Homes. [online] macsphere.mcmaster.ca. Available at: https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/handle/11375/25817 [Accessed 2 Feb. 2024].
  • Quinn, C., Pickett, J.A., Litherland, R., Morris, R.G., Martyr, A. and Clare, L. (2021). Living well with dementia: What is possible and how to promote it. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 37(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5627.
  • Rodriguez (Then), F.S., Jackson, J., Ware, C., Churchyard, R. and Hanseeuw, B. (2020). Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Perspectives: On the Road to a Holistic Approach to Dementia Prevention and Care. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports, [online] 4(1), pp.39–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-180070.
  • SET?AWAN, A., DEGENG?., SA'DIJAH, C. and PRAHERDH?ONO, H. (2020). The Effect Of Collaborative Problem Solving Strategies And Cognitive Style On Students' Problem Solving Abilities. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.812781.
  • Shafi, M., Zoya, Lei, Z., Song, X. and Sarker, M.N.I. (2020). The effects of transformational leadership on employee creativity: Moderating role of intrinsic motivation. Asia Pacific Management Review, [online] 25(3), pp.166–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.12.002.
  • Siangchokyoo, N., Klinger, R.L. and Campion, E.D. (2019). Follower Transformation as the Linchpin of Transformational Leadership theory: a Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), p.101341.
  • Subramanian, N. and Suresh, M. (2022). Assessment Framework for Agile HRM Practices. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 23(1), pp.135–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00294-6.
  • Torous, J., Bucci, S., Bell, I.H., Kessing, L.V., Faurholt?Jepsen, M., Whelan, P., Carvalho, A.F., Keshavan, M., Linardon, J. and Firth, J. (2021). The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry, 20(3), pp.318–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20883.
  • Trang, J., Herbert, A. and Sansom?Daly, U.M. (2022). How can advance care planning tools help young people's voices be heard? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 6(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16095.
  • van der Schaar, M., Alaa, A.M., Floto, A., Gimson, A., Scholtes, S., Wood, A., McKinney, E., Jarrett, D., Lio, P. and Ercole, A. (2020). How artificial intelligence and machine learning can help healthcare systems respond to COVID-19. Machine Learning, 5(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-020-05928-x.
  • van Hoof, J., Marston, H.R., Kazak, J.K. and Buffel, T. (2021). Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment. Building and Environment, 199(7), p.107922. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107922.
  • Vellani, S., Puts, M., Iaboni, A., Degan, C. and McGilton, K.S. (2021). Integration of a Palliative Approach in the Care of Older Adults with Dementia in Primary Care Settings: A Scoping Review. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 6(7), pp.1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0714980821000349.
  • Wager, K.A., Lee, F.W. and Glaser, J.P. (2021). Health Care Information Systems: A Practical Approach for Health Care Management. [online] Google Books. John Wiley & Sons. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=io1SEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR15&dq=New+approaches+to+the+healthcare+management+along+with+the+patient+requirements+change+over+time&ots=X6Fltp67ah&sig=6K2UmRo64cyivRRgMUFrK-418l4 [Accessed 2 Feb. 2024].
  • Wright, D., Gabbay, J. and May, A.L. (2021). Determining the skills needed by frontline NHS staff to deliver quality improvement: findings from six case studies. BMJ Quality & Safety, [online] 31(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013065.
  • Zhao, D., Sun, X., Shan, B., Yang, Z., Yang, J., Liu, H., Jiang, Y. and Yokoi, H. (2023). Research status of elderly-care robots and safe human-robot interaction methods. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17(7). doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1291682.
Seasonal Offer
scan qr code from mobile

Get Extra 10% OFF on WhatsApp Order

Get best price for your work

×
Securing Higher Grades Costing Your Pocket? Book Your Assignment At The Lowest Price Now!
X