Interface Between Human Behaviour & Organisation At Individual, Work Group & Organisational Levels

Interface Between Human Behaviour & Organisation At The Individual, Work Group & Organisational Levels

Organizational behavior refers to the study of how individuals behave within an organization and how their behavior affects the organization as a whole (Arvey et.al 2016). The way employees behave and interact with one another, as well as the overall organizational culture, can have a significant impact on an organization's success.

Choose New Assignment Help for all your assignment needs in the UK. Our dedication to customer satisfaction and academic integrity sets us apart as a trusted partner in your educational journey.

When it comes to understanding and regulating organizational behavior, organizations must consider a number of aspects. For example, workforce diversity, organizational structure, power distribution, communication routes, and motivation tactics are all key factors influencing employee behavior and overall company effectiveness (Putra and Ali, 2022). With shifting client expectations, increased rivalry and technology improvements, the business environment has become increasingly complicated and challenging in recent years. Organizations must adapt to these changes and establish strategies that correspond with their corporate goals and objectives in order to remain competitive and successful.

This report will focus on the application of behavioral motivational theories and techniques within the context of Unilever, a global consumer goods company. The report will begin by providing a concise overview of Unilever's obtainable culture and assessing how my individuality would fit into it. The report will then critically evaluate how personal perspectives and attributes can be adapted to organizational factors such as politics, power distribution, motivational strategies, and communication, with relevant examples (Miner, 2015).

The report will also argue for and provide examples of the implementation of behavioural motivating theories and approaches. This assessment will be introspective, concentrating on the concept and submission of the models appropriate for the selected organisation. Ultimately, the study will justify how changing personal attitudes and traits might affect staff efficiency. Overall, this study will provide a thorough examination of the issues surrounding organisational behaviour and its significance in today's business environment.

Personality: Personality and Organisational Culture

A Brief Overview of Unilever culture

Unilever is a firm that prioritises sustainable operations and social responsibility. They have established high sustainability targets, including becoming carbon neutral by 2039, and have pledged to limit their use of plastic and obtain all of their agricultural raw materials in a sustainable manner (Røstvik, 2022). This concentration on sustainability is reflected in the company's culture, as employees are encouraged to consider the environmental impact of their work and to devise innovative ways to reduce waste and reduce the company's carbon footprint.

Unilever places a high importance on creativity and innovation. Employees are encouraged to take risks and think outside the box in order to develop new products and ideas. This is shown in the company's devotion to R&D, as they invest extensively in developing new technologies and products. Unilever also supports a culture of continuous learning and improvement on condition that workforce with chances for instruction and growth to get better their skill and expertise.

Unilever places a high focus on diversity and inclusion. The organisation seeks to establish a work environment in which everyone, regardless of origin or identity, feels valued and respected (Evans et.al 2020). They have set diversity and inclusion goals, such as increasing the presence of women in managerial positions and guaranteeing a diverse workforce. Unilever also provides funding to employee resource groups and initiatives that encourage inclusion and diversity, such as the Unilever Women's Network and the Unilever LGBTQ+ Network.

Unilever's culture is built on its core principles of integrity, respect, and accountability, which are reflected in how the firm does business and treats its workers (Pant and Ramachandran, 2017). This culture values diversity and inclusivity while encouraging creativity, innovation, and a dedication to sustainability.

Assessing My Personality Fit with Unilever's Culture:

I believe that my personality would match well with Unilever's culture as someone who appreciates sustainability and social responsibility. I am enthusiastic about making a positive difference in the world and feel that businesses must do the same.

Furthermore, I appreciate creativity and innovation as well as believe that a work atmosphere that supports risk-taking and out-of-the-box thinking would be a good fit for me. I also embrace diversity and inclusivity and see the significance of creating an environment in which everyone feels appreciated and respected (Heller and Kelly, 2015).

Overall, I believe my personality fits well with Unilever's culture, and I am pleased about the opportunity to contribute to the company's purpose of making the world more sustainable and socially responsible.

How personality affect management approaches and company performance

Personality qualities can have a substantial impact on management techniques and corporate performance. Positive personality traits such as openness, social competence, and agreeableness can contribute to more competent management and higher levels of organisational success (Mees-Buss, et.al 2019).

Openness to new ideas and experiences is a personality trait that can lead to creative problem solving and a readiness to seek alternate solutions to problems. This can result in more creativity as well as more efficient and effective decision-making. Managers that are transparent can be more sensitive to employee feedback and can foster an innovative culture inside the firm.

Conscientiousness is another personality attribute that can have a good impact on management techniques and corporate performance. This personality attribute is distinguished by a strong sense of responsibility, dependability, and goal orientation. Managers that are conscientious can set a good example for their staff and establish high expectations for them. This can result in increased organisational dedication and goal achievement, as well as improved work performance and efficiency.

Agreeableness, characterized by a friendly and cooperative nature, is another positive personality trait that can lead to better management approaches and company performance. Managers that are agreeable can establish positive relationships with their staff and hence create a positive work environment. This can result in increased employee work satisfaction, higher staff retention rates, and improved organisational performance.

Negative personality qualities, on the other hand, such as neuroticism, low agreeability, and low conscientiousness, can have a negative impact on managerial techniques and firm performance. Neuroticism can cause greater tension and indecision, which can have a serious affect on decision-making and overall productivity. Poor agreeability can result in disagreement and tension between staff and upper management, resulting in lower morale and job satisfaction. Poor conscientiousness can result in diminished dependability, missed deadlines, and a lack of accountability, all of which can have an adverse impact on organisational performance.

Personality qualities have a considerable impact on managerial techniques and corporate performance. Openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness are examples of positive personality traits that can contribute to more effective management and higher levels of organisational performance (Bothma et.al 2015). Negative personality qualities can have a negative impact on management strategies and business performance. Managers must be conscious of their personality qualities and how they influence their leadership style and overall organisational effectiveness.

Reflect on your personality and perceptions in terms of your own performance

As an HR professional, it is critical for me to consider my own personality attributes and judgements of my own performance. In terms of personality characteristics, I believe myself to be attentive and polite. I take my obligations and assignments seriously and I am dedicated to increasing effectiveness. I am also approachable and friendly, which I believe will help me develop strong connections to my co-workers and clients.

I am conscious that my conscientiousness can sometimes lead to me being overly perfectionist and spending too much time on things, which can have a negative impact on my productivity. As a result, I attempt to create a bridge between my need for high-quality work and my need for efficiency and time management (Su and Reynolds, 2017).

In terms of perceptions, I respect open and honest communication. I feel that open and honest communication is essential for establishing trust and maintaining strong relationships at work. As a result, I make an effort to communicate clearly and directly with colleagues and clients, as well as to actively listen to their ideas and concerns.

I feel Diversity and inclusion are also critical components of a successful and productive firm. I am committed to understanding and respecting my colleagues' and clients' different viewpoints and experiences, as well as to establishing an inclusive and supportive work environment.

In terms of my own performance, I consider that my conscientiousness and agreeableness have contributed to my ability to be a dependable and productive team player. I am devoted to working cooperatively with my colleagues to achieve common goals and objectives, and I am eager to take on new tasks and responsibilities to help the organisation succeed.

Generally, I believe that my personality qualities and perceptions are compatible with Unilever's beliefs and ambitions. As an HR professional, I am dedicated to fostering a good and supportive work environment, as well as promoting the organization's success and growth.

Perceptions:

How could your personal traits and perspectives be adapted organisational factors the company's politics, power distribution, motivational strategy, and communication with examples

As an HR specialist at Unilever, I can adapt my personal characteristics and perspectives to different organisational aspects such as company politics, power distribution, motivating approach, and communication.

My conscientiousness and agreeableness can help me negotiate political issues with diplomacy and tact in the workplace. I am committed to understanding stakeholders' various viewpoints and interests, and I am ready to collaborate and negotiate in order to develop mutually beneficial solutions. For example, if two departments disagree about how to allocate resources, I could organise a discussion between the two departments to develop a solution that fits both of their needs.

Regarding power distribution, I believe that clarity and communication are crucial to ensuring that power is allocated equitably and effectively inside the business. I am dedicated to encouraging open and honest interactions between staff and leadership, as well as ensuring that all employees have a vote in decision-making processes. For example, if a choice is being made that would have an impact on a specific department or team; I may make certain that members from that department or team participate in the decision-making process.

In terms of motivational strategy, my own characteristics and perspectives can assist me in creating a welcoming and engaging work atmosphere. As a polite and friendly individual, I am dedicated to building excellent relationships with my coworkers and clients. I feel that recognition and appreciation are significant motivators, and I might try to ensure that employees' accomplishments are recognised and rewarded. For example, I may put in place a programme that recognises individuals who have proven great performance or who have gone above and beyond in their work.

Finally, when it comes to communication, my own characteristics and opinions can assist me in developing clear and effective communication strategy. As someone who appreciates open communication and transparency, I am committed to ensuring that staff have access to the information they require to do their jobs efficiently. For example, to ensure that staff are informed about corporate policies, processes, and goals, I could develop a communication plan that contains regular updates and feedback channels

Critical evaluation of your own perceptions

As I reflect on my own perceptions of how my personal traits and perspectives could be adapted to improve employee motivation and effectiveness at Unilever, I am aware of both my strengths and potential limitations.

Conscientiousness is one of my qualities; it indicates that I am responsible, dependable, and dedicated to producing high-quality products. This attribute, I believe, might be applied to inspire employees by setting high performance goals and expectations, as well as recognising and rewarding those who consistently reach or surpass those requirements (Zhou and Wu, 2018). For example, I may collaborate with managers to develop a performance management system that focuses on clear goals and objectives, ongoing feedback and coaching, and recognition and awards for exceptional performance.

Another strength that I bring to the table is my agreeableness, which means that I am cooperative, supportive, and able to work effectively with others. I believe that this trait could be adapted to promote a positive and supportive work environment that fosters teamwork and collaboration (Northouse, 2021). For example, I could work with managers to create team-building activities and opportunities for employees to get to know each other on a personal level, such as social events or volunteer activities.

All the same, I am aware that my own characteristics and ideas may have limitations. My agreeableness, for example, may make it tough for me to negotiate conflicts or oppose authority when necessary (Namugenyi et.al 2019). I may need to improve my assertiveness abilities in order to effectively advocate for employees and oppose potentially detrimental or unjust rules or practises.

Also, I may need to gain a better awareness of the specific cultural and sociological aspects that influence employee motivation and effectiveness in the setting of Unilever. For example, cultural differences in how answers to which are recorded to recognition and rewards, or distinct social dynamics that determine how power and influence are divided inside the firm, may exist.

My personal characteristics and perspectives, I feel, may be applied to boost employee motivation and performance at Unilever (Frandsen and Johansen, 2016). But, I acknowledge the importance of continuing to expand my abilities and knowledge in order to successfully traverse the numerous organisational elements that influence employee behaviour and performance. I feel that by committing to continuous learning and progress, I can contribute to the organization's success and the well-being of its workers.

Task 2

Application of behavioural motivation theories and techniques in the organization:

Motivation is an important factor in employee engagement and job satisfaction, which in turn leads to increased productivity and organizational success (Hislop et.al. 2018). There are several motivational theories and techniques that can be applied in an organizational setting to enhance worker motivation, including Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, and Expectancy Theory.

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs is a well-known motivational theory that suggests that people have five basic requirements that have to be met in order for them to be pleased and motivated at work. Physiological needs (such as food and shelter), safety needs, social needs, esteem needs, and self-actualization requirements are among these. For example, in the perspective of Unilever, addressing employees' physiological demands can mean providing nutritious meal options in the company cafeteria and making sure workers have access to secure and comfortable working environments. Addressing the social needs of employees may entail establishing a feeling of belonging and teamwork inside the workplace through team-building events and regular communication.

According to Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, there are two types of elements that influence employees ’ motivation: hygiene factors and motivators. Salary, job security, and working environment are examples of hygiene elements that must be met in order for employees to be content with their jobs. Motivators, on the other hand, are things that contribute to happiness at work and inspiration, such as recognition, achievement, and possibilities for advancement. Unilever, for example, may offer competitive salary and benefit packages to meet the hygienic demands of its employees, while also providing possibilities for professional growth and recognition programmes to boost motivation.

Expectancy Theory propose that employees are encouraged by the belief that their efforts will lead to required outcomes. In order to increase motivation, organizations must ensure that employees consider that their hard work will lead to the needed outcomes, and that the outcome are valued by the employee. For example, Unilever might set clear performance goals for employees and provide regular feedback and recognition to help employees see the connection between their efforts and the desired outcomes.

In addition to these beliefs, various motivational strategies, such as goal-setting, recognition and feedback, and work design, can be used in an organisational environment. Unilever, for example, may establish a performance management system that combines goal-setting as well as regular feedback and reward to boost staff motivation. Work design approaches like job development and position rotation can also be utilised to boost employee engagement by providing more demanding and interesting work.

The application of motivational theories and techniques is essential in creating an organizational culture that engages employees with their job and organization, resulting in enhanced organizational performance. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, and Expectancy Theory are some of the well-known motivational theories that can be applied in an organizational setting. In addition, there are several motivational techniques that can be used, such as goal-setting, feedback and recognition, and job design. By understanding and applying these theories and techniques, organizations like Unilever can create a work environment that fosters employee motivation, job satisfaction, and organizational success.

In addition to the application of motivational theories and techniques discussed earlier, there are several other approaches that Unilever could adopt to further enhance employee motivation and effectiveness. These include the use of goal-setting theory, job design theory, and strengthening theory.

Individuals are more motivated to perform when they have clear, difficult goals to work towards, according to goal-setting theory. This approach could be applied by Unilever by establishing specified, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals for employees at all levels of the firm. Sales teams, for example, could be assigned sales targets, while individual employees could be assigned performance objectives that match with the company's overall aims. Unilever could help to enhance motivation and focus while also establishing a sense of direction and purpose by providing staff with defined goals and objectives.

In contrast, work design theory focuses on the design and structure of employment in order to promote motivation and pleasure. Unilever might apply this approach by rethinking employment roles and responsibilities in order to provide employees more autonomy, variety, and challenge. Employees could, for example, be given more decision-making authority or cycled through different jobs and departments to obtain a broader perspective and develop new abilities. Unilever could help to enhance motivation and employee satisfaction while decreasing turnover and absenteeism by providing more engaging and rewarding employment.

Finally, reinforcement theory says that reinforced behaviours are more probable to occur again in the future. Unilever might utilise this principle by providing the employees with positive reinforcement for their performance and achievements, such as recognition, awards, and feedback. Unilever, for example, might develop an employee recognition programme that recognises individuals for exceptional performance or contributions to the company's sustainability goals. Unilever may be able to boost employee enthusiasm and engagement while also reinforcing desired behaviours and values by offering positive reinforcement.

Critically assess how the implementation of content and process theories of motivation impacts the employees’ enhanced individual motivation and team effectiveness

Implementation of content and process theories of motivation can have a significant impact on employee behavior and overall organizational performance. Content theories of motivation focus on identifying the precise factors that motivate persons, while process theories of motivation center on the psychological process that inspire motivation. The application of these theories can impact employees in several ways (Safa et.al. 2015).

The implementation of content theories of motivation can help to identify the specific needs and desires of employees. For instance, Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs theory suggests that persons have a set of basic wants that must be met earlier than they can be provoked to pursue higher-level needs. If organizations can identify the specific needs of their employees, they can design their motivational strategies to align with those needs, which can lead to increased employee satisfaction, motivation, and performance (Pham et.al. 2019).

The implementation of process theories of motivation can help to create a work environment that promotes intrinsic motivation. Organizations can foster these elements by providing employees with opportunities for decision-making, skill-building, and social connection, which can lead to increased employee engagement and job satisfaction (Shiau and Chau, 2016).

Conclusion

The report concluded that the personal perspectives and traits are critical to an organization's performance, particularly in terms of staff motivation and efficiency. Organizations can change their policies and tactics to respond to the individual demands of their employees by knowing the many behavioural motivating theories and methodologies. In the instance of Unilever, the adoption of these ideas and approaches can boost employee motivation, resulting in enhanced work satisfaction, productivity, and overall organisational performance.

Moreover, adapting personal perspectives and attributes to organizational factors can have a significant impact on employee engagement and efficiency. By fostering a positive work culture that values diversity, inclusivity, and open communication, employees are more likely to feel valued and motivated to perform at their best. This can lead to increased employee retention and reduced turnover, resulting in cost savings for the organization.

The report summarizes that the use of behavioural motivational theories and practises, as well as the adaptation of personal perspectives and characteristics, can have a major impact on employee motivation and efficiency. Long-term performance and competitive advantage are more likely for organisations that invest in knowing their employees' needs and modifying their policies and tactics to meet them. Organizations can achieve greater efficiency, innovation, and overall success by providing a work environment that supports employee engagement and pleasure.

References

Arvey, R.D., Li, W.D. and Wang, N., 2016. Genetics and organizational behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, pp.167-190.

Bothma, F.C., Lloyd, S. and Khapova, S., 2015. Work identity: Clarifying the concept. Conceptualising and measuring work identity: South-African perspectives and findings, pp.23-51.

Evans, D.M., Browne, A.L. and Gortemaker, I.A., 2020. Environmental leapfrogging and everyday climate cultures: sustainable water consumption in the Global South. Climatic Change, 163(1), pp.83-97.

Frandsen, F. and Johansen, W., 2016. Organizational crisis communication: A multivocal approach. Sage.

Heller, M. and Kelly, A., 2015. Throwaway history: Brand ephemera and consumer culture. Journal of Macromarketing, 35(3), pp.397-406.

Mees-Buss, J., Welch, C. and Westney, D.E., 2019. What happened to the transnational? The emergence of the neo-global corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, pp.1513-1543.

Miner, J.B., 2015. Organizational behavior 4: From theory to practice. Routledge.

Namugenyi, C., Nimmagadda, S.L. and Reiners, T., 2019. Design of a SWOT analysis model and its evaluation in diverse digital business ecosystem contexts. Procedia Computer Science, 159, pp.1145-1154.

Northouse, P.G., 2021. Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.

Pant, A. and Ramachandran, J., 2017. Navigating identity duality in multinational subsidiaries: A paradox lens on identity claims at Hindustan Unilever 1959–2015. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, pp.664-692.

Putra, R. and Ali, H., 2022. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR DETERMINATION AND DECISION MAKING: ANALYSIS OF SKILLS, MOTIVATION AND COMMUNICATION (LITERATURE REVIEW OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT). Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management, 3(3), pp.420-431.

Røstvik, C.M., 2022. Tampon Technology in Britain: Unilever's Project Hyacinth and the" 7-Day War" Campaign, 1968–1980. Technology and Culture, 63(1), pp.61-86.

Su, N. and Reynolds, D., 2017. Effects of brand personality dimensions on consumers’ perceived self-image congruity and functional congruity with hotel brands. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 66, pp.1-12.

Zhou, F. and Wu, Y.J., 2018. How humble leadership fosters employee innovation behavior: A two-way perspective on the leader-employee interaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.

Hislop, D., Bosua, R. and Helms, R., 2018. Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction. Oxford university press.

Safa, N.S., Sookhak, M., Von Solms, R., Furnell, S., Ghani, N.A. and Herawan, T., 2015. Information security conscious care behaviour formation in organizations. Computers & Security, 53, pp.65-78.

Pham, N.T., Tu?ková, Z. and Jabbour, C.J.C., 2019. Greening the hospitality industry: How do green human resource management practices influence organizational citizenship behavior in hotels? A mixed-methods study. Tourism Management, 72, pp.386-399.

Shiau, W.L. and Chau, P.Y., 2016. Understanding behavioral intention to use a cloud computing classroom: A multiple model comparison approach. Information & Management, 53(3), pp.355-365.