Critical Incident Report Analysis Assignment Sample

  • 54000+ Project Delivered
  • 500+ Experts 24x7 Online Help
  • No AI Generated Content
- +
35% Off
£ 6.69
Estimated Cost
£ 4.35
14 Pages 3509Words

Introduction of Critical Incident Report Analysis Assignment

Get free written samples from expert assignment writers and academic writing services in UK.

The study will depict deep insight into the different aspects of leadership and its approach and define how leadership is changing rapidly in current times globally and the movement towards the relationship, stakeholder-based perspective of leadership. On the other hand, it would also enhance knowledge about the necessity of organisational leaders to involve societal and atmospheric concerns when making decisions. Moreover, it would also enhance understanding of the demerits and merits of the leadership approach. It would also enhance knowledge about whether leaders must confine their decision-making and pronouncement within the company. At last, it would enhance a suitable conclusion about overall lessons learned from this analysis.

There has been huge evolution and change in leadership theories since the invention of this concept in the 1840s when the first Great Man theory was introduced, which seems to define that leaders cannot be trained or made but are born. The person has a unique personality and features that make them leaders and achieve success through divine design. Then, the trait theories came into existence which stated that leaders could either be made or born (Do and Mai, 2021). Thus, a person can also become a leader through acquiring practice and training. Moreover, from the 1940s to the 1950s,behaviouralleadership theory evolved, which signifies that leaders are created in place of being born, and those specific behaviours could be studied to become effective leaders by a person.

After that, the evolution of situational leadership took place in the 1960s, stating that leadership style can be adopted based on the prevailing situations and conditions. After this, the biggest change and modification that came in the leadership theory is that the transformational leadership theory generated a huge revolution in technology, rationale, and environment in the organisations which was adopted by Tesla and Amazon (Hunt and Fedynich, 2019). The move towards stakeholder, relationship-based leadership has assisted the leaders in creating deep bonding with employees, thereby understanding their professional issues and resolving them instantly.

  • Analysis

The necessity for organisational leaders to engage with environmental and societal concerns while making decisions

The organisational leaders must engage and be involved in societal and environmental issues while making business decisions because it will help them avoid conflicts with the local people of the area where they would be establishing their manufacturing site and office. For examples, Tesla Motors seemsto be engaged in societal and environmental issues that had assisted them in respecting the residents’ social, religious, and cultural values, thereby gaining a good reputation in their eyes (STANSFIELD and GILROY, 2022). If the leaders of Tesla Motors make efforts to resolve the environmental issues through less using of toxic materials, reducing carbon emissions, producing organic products, and reusing and recycling the leftover or wasted raw materials then it would be easier for the organisation to function properly with full legal obligations and permissions. This will increase their brand value in the international market, thereby generating more requests and demands by other countries to offer them their market for investment in the future (Dionisio and de Vargas, 2020).

On the other hand, the organisational leaders of Amazon seems to be involved with societal concerns so that the residents living nearby have trust in them in the sense that their company would consider their cultural and religious concerns while making business decisions. Thus, it can be said that for engaging with atmospheric and societal concerns during undertaking business decisions, organisational leaders are needed to adopt and follow sustainable leadership (Gillan et al., 2021). This will further make their work easier and more affordable to achieve their long-run goals in the future. Sustainable leadership incorporates these behaviours and practices that generate final impressions for every stakeholder: society, surroundings, and destiny generations. Sustainable management is an asset of aggressive benefit for corporations. Sustainable leadership brings possibilities to the companies through innovation, steady development, sustained rivalry benefit, and long-time achievement.

Moreover, sustainable management would raise overall organisational performance to decrease expenses and grow capacity sales. Sustainable leaders have proactive methods to continuously test the atmosphere to inspect the exterior modifications within the marketplace. Concerning inner tasks, sustainable leaders expand a protracted-time period mission, emphasiseenvironmental projects, apprehend sustainability problems, instill green control structures, and publicise growth, radical improvement, and new ideas (Cook and Glass, 2018). Nevertheless, sustainable leaders concentrate on conducting the finest overall performance for each society and surroundings out of the corporation. Beneath sustainable leadership, groups obtain several advantages and shield the natural assets and green utilisation of sources. On the other hand, to deal with environmental and societal concerns, organisational leaders must adopt corporate social responsibility. Corporate social responsibility is defined as how an organisation takes steps to make certain there are high-quality social and environmental outcomes related to the manner the commercial enterprise operates (Cornelissen and Smith, 2022).

Companies like Tesco that interact in lively CSR efforts take inventory of how they perform within the international market to contain cultural and social problems to reap the rewards each within the method (Javed et al., 2020). No longer only could CSR models boom enterprise and sales, they publicise exchange and development in the course of the sector, which frequently includes supporting human beings with some or no assets. CSR is considered as exceptional from philanthropy. While nicely carried out, it needs to come to be ingrained within the values and way of life of an enterprise and undoubtedly affect the manner the organisation does business. CSR ought to come to be inherent within an enterprise’s project and message and maintain a powerful position in advertising and marketing (Gillan et al., 2021). Agencies have to be conscious that selling their CSR version only helps the organisation if they may be already performing on their plan.

In any other case, falsely claiming to carry social exchange to the ones in want should result in horrific exposure. A corporation thatfails to remember its sustainable obligations carries a threat to itsbottom line and its brand (Li et al., 2019) Lacking environmental and social integrity can severely affecta corporation’s general profits and achievement. These days, clients require spending their income on services and products that they consider right among and interacting with companies that comply with ethical tasksto achieve its ideals.

Merits and demerits of the leadership approach


Underneath democratic leadership techniques, unique thoughts are shared without problems with each other. This sort of approach is exceedingly powerful and effective. Desires and morale of the worker in the direction of the task will increase. Underneath the autocratic approach, it is believe that the most effective leaders make decisions not a single communication errorseems to generate. Under these types, the time for making choices is short. The unthinkable accidents or threatening situations could be tackled extra efficiently. Underneath bureaucratic leadership responsibilities of every employeeare central, and the duties are surprisingly protected. Each stage is properly established and structured. Underneath a transformational approach seems to bea kind of management in which managers continually try to recognise their employees’ efforts(Newman et al., 2018). A transformational leader of Amazon keep sits employees jointlyto enhance undesired changes within the objectives, accidents, and any tough scenario (Khan et al., 2022). The chief encourages their institution toward the goal and makes them interactive and extra communicative. The transactional approach is essentially a supervision kind. Under this leadership,performance appraisal offers to the employeesin response totheir work andmaypenalise low-qualityoutcomes.

The primary difference between these approaches is that a chief seems to be the highest authority that motivates and energises the goal’s direction (Kumar and Provodnikova, 2021). Within this kind, leaders make workers extra efficient. The Laissez-Faire approach would raise employees’ confidence extensively. This form of leadership is usually visible in houses where youngsters are permitted to make personal choices. Beneath strategic approach, management wherein pinnacle executives of agencies improve procedures and missions for the organisation’s welfare (Sivaruban, 2021). They play the principal function in selection making. This makes pinnacle control extra accountable in the direction of the purpose. They develop an established and structured pathway for selection making, making the goal greater seen and clean.


Within the democratic approach, it seems hard to hold the collaboration of a few institutions. Disagreeing and agreeing on the specific subject matter might also result in a communication error. There are possibilities of getting negative thoughts from unskilled employees. An autocratic sort of approach is not often powerful (Henderikx and Stoffers, 2022). When team members of Tesco Company are not involved in choice-making, this can result in a reduction in employee confidence. This increasesthe probability of losing trust between leaders and organisations seems to be higher (Khan et al., 2022). Under the bureaucratic approach, this seems to be far more rigid because of its dependent manner (Turner and Baker, 2018). This sort of leadership can nolongerengenderinnovativenessin the employees. Corporations that practicethesetypes of leadership do not make any new changes. The transformational approach generates danger that could result in awful outcomes. Leaders ought to forget about some protocols of the business enterprise (Turner and Baker, 2018). Inside transactional management, leaders every so often grow to be insensitive in the direction of their personnel. They are aware of being extra on the right track as a substitute for a worker’s innovation and motivation. Underneath laissez-faire, if the institution member is no longer successful, the chance of getting irrelevant results would rise.

The democratic leadership approach generates more reviews, views, and reports. Flexibility is tough because of outdated plans and techniques. On the other hand, forecasting might also result in misguided outcomes (Lord et al., 2020).

It would additionally highlight team individuals thatendure sturdy creativityskills and humans who do not. If one crew member continuously has their thoughts carried out, another team worker could generate envy through this leadership approach (Turner and Baker, 2018).Their reviews were no longer important, which finally restricted them from being involvedin the entire process. Until the bad feelings are controlled, this leadership fashion can frequently reduce growth instead of improving it (Kumar and Provodnikova, 2021). Leaders who utilise this leading approachmay rely on employees for solutions. Instead of enhancing a selection, they defer to their group for thoughts. As a result, there is no longer the usual duration to achieve this. Once in a while, being a leader means they undertake a choice for the entire group within seconds (Megheirkouni and Mejheirkouni, 2020). Managementwho rely on these leadership structures might additionally achieve less because they look after an individual to conveydesirable ideas. This is because all people can voice a viewpoint or provide a thought. Every concept should be discussed earlier such it can be disregarded. The discussions could result in late delivery for large groups as everyone tries to discover the possible high-quality answer and get onto the same page (Cornelissen and Smith, 2022).

Democratic management styles can make feelings of uncertainty inner a collection because of the preference to make rapid alternatives sometimes. It positions the leader’s proper right into a bad and worst situation. For example, leaders of Amazon decorate those wanted alternatives inside the absence of consulting their group, then the organisation participants may additionally be amazed at the same time as, or if, they may be consulted for future goals (Carton, 2022). They reduce the duration with the useful resource of sharing with their organisation and gaining remarks on each idea. As a result of an autocratic chief’s overview, the employee no longer does the task, as the autocrat tends to oversee each small element of the task being accomplished. Employees may lose confidence because their organisation is uncertain about their ability (Ensari and Riggio, 2020).

Authoritarian managers alternate into severe micromanagers, making it difficult for employees to do their tasks because they may be usually compelled to report what they may be done instantly. At the same time as this happens, boom levels will be inclined to decrease over time in choosing to grow. Autocratic leaders are in price, and they make this truth identified. They get to take each credit score for the project this is done. This means employees will be predisposed to not take ownership of the assignment they do because of the reality that there can be no incentive to perform that. They could no longer get blamed if it fails and that they acquired it and get a credit score if it succeeds. It is through the years that this makes worker morale start to sink (Turner and Baker, 2018). It moreover generates difficulties for the leader because of the truth they may get blamed for the actions of a worker at the same time as that worker changed into advised to do something in reality specific. At the same time, as an autocratic leader who is consistent with their ethics and creates a sincere supportive environment, there can be some positives for personnel in an enterprise(Ensari and Riggio, 2020). However, if the leader offers questionable ethics and refuses to create fairness, then there can be no one who could keep that man or woman accountable.

The work tradition is dependent entirely on the morality and ethics of the chief; because of this, a negative operating environment is no longer possible to alternate (Megheirkouni and Mejheirkouni, 2020). Employees are pressured to depend on the autocratic chief for their remarks, commands, and work responsibilities. If they face a selection in the task, they may be doing, theymay be compelled to visit the leader for recommendations on what to do in place of creating the selection on their own. That makes it nearly impossible for leaders to go away from the administrative center, as employees may become so dependent on their selection-making skills that nothing receives carried out if the chief is not present for a few causes (Megheirkouni and Mejheirkouni, 2020). Apositive operating relationship is employees’ capacity to believe in their leaders and vice-versa. The inspiration of the autocratic management style is one constructed on distrust. Leaders should anticipate that their employees are not appearing as they ought to, which calls for their direct supervision to make certain outcomes occur (Turner and Baker, 2018). These kinds of interactions no longer generate a sustainable operating bonding, which in the long run generates productiveness issues as people experience decreased morale ranges.

Evaluation of whether leadership should confine their pronouncement and decision-making within the company

The leadership of companies like Tesla Motors should not confine and restrict their decision-making and pronouncement within the company because it will not provide the scope to increase their growth and development as a leader in the future. On the other hand, to enhance environmental considerations, the leaders need to analyse the different aspects outside the organisation’s sphere. This will further make them able to understand better the manufacturing and sales activities that negatively impact the growth and mindset of the organisation. Thus, it can be said that the leader should understand the global sphere that falls outside the organisation. This will further assist them in analysing the current changes that are taking place in the field of technology, science, marketing tactics, and changes in the tastes and preferences of the target customers (Javed et al., 2020).

The high level of interaction with the local cultutre would further help the leaders know the different leadership styles they should adopt to generate a good social reputation. It would make the leaders understand the initiatives that they could provide to society at large in the future through remaining in a company (Javed et al., 2020). On the other hand, they are also needed to reduce micromanaging by involving themselves in an analysis of the evolution that is taking place (Dionisio and de Vargas, 2020). It is also necessary for the leaders to leave the fear of losing control and authority over employees that restrict them from enhancing decision-making outside the company.


The above study has analysed that the biggest change and modification that came in the leadership theory is the transformational leadership theory that generated a huge revolution in terms of technological, rational, and environmental in the organisations. On the other hand, it has been observed that if the leaders make efforts to resolve the environmental issues through less use of toxic materials, reducing carbon emissions, providing organic products, and reusing and recycling the leftover or wasted raw materials. It would be easier for the organisation to function properly with full legal obligations and permissions.

Moreover, it has been identified that corporate social responsibility is defined as how an organisation takes steps to make certain there are high-quality social and environmental outcomes related to the commercial enterprise operation. Companies that interact in lively CSR efforts take inventory of how they perform within the international market to contain cultural and social problems to reap the rewards each within the method. The above study helped to understand that under this leadership, praising the worker for their application. It will further provide penaltiesbecause of terrible outcomes. Moreover,the primary difference between the leadership approaches is that the leaders are considered above all within the organisation.It would additionally enhance understanding of the demerits and merits of the leadership approach. It would also enhance knowledge about whether leaders must confine their decision-making and pronouncement within the company.


Carton, A.M., 2022. The Science of Leadership: A Theoretical Model and Research Agenda. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior9.

Cook, A. and Glass, C., 2018. Women on corporate boards: Do they advance corporate social responsibility?. Human Relations, 71(7), pp.897-924.

Cornelissen, R.P. and Smith, J., 2022. Leadership approaches of principals heading National Strategy Learner Attainment schools in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, pp.56-83.

Dionisio, M. and de Vargas, E.R., 2020. Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review. International business review, 29(2), p.101641.

Do, T.T. and Mai, N.K., 2021. The Evolution of Leadership Theories: A Literature Review. Recent Developments in Vietnamese Business and Finance, pp.297-314.

Ensari, N. and Riggio, R.E., 2020. Exclusion of inclusion in leadership theories. In Inclusive Leadership (pp. 25-38). Routledge.

Gillan, S.L., Koch, A. and Starks, L.T., 2021. Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, p.101889.

Henderikx, M. and Stoffers, J., 2022. An Exploratory Literature Study into Digital Transformation and Leadership: Toward Future-Proof Middle Managers. Sustainability14(2), p.687.

Hunt, T. and Fedynich, L., 2019. Leadership: Past, present, and future: An evolution of an idea. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 8(2), pp.22-26.

Javed, M., Rashid, M.A., Hussain, G. and Ali, H.Y., 2020. The effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and firm financial performance: Moderating role of responsible leadership. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), pp.1395-1409.

Khan, S.N., Rehman, H.M. and Javaid, M., 2022. Overview of Leadership Approaches. In Leadership and Followership in an Organizational Change Context (pp. 1-21). IGI Global.

Kumar, R. and Provodnikova, A., 2021. Leadership styles–past, present and future. Global journal of Business and Integral Security.

Li, H., Sajjad, N., Wang, Q., Muhammad Ali, A., Khaqan, Z. and Amina, S., 2019. Influence of transformational leadership on employees’ innovative work behavior in sustainable organisations: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Sustainability, 11(6), p.1594.

Lord, R.G., Epitropaki, O., Foti, R.J. and Hansbrough, T.K., 2020. Implicit leadership theories, implicit followership theories, and dynamic processing of leadership information. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, pp.49-74.

Lyndon, S., Pandey, A. and Navare, A., 2020. Shared leadership and team creativity: Investigating the role of cognitive trust and team learning through mixed method approach. Personnel Review..

Megheirkouni, M. and Mejheirkouni, A., 2020. Leadership development trends and challenges in the twenty-first century: rethinking the priorities. Journal of Management Development.

Newman, A., Herman, H.M., Schwarz, G. and Nielsen, I., 2018. The effects of employees’ creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior: The role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of Business Research, 89, pp.1-9.

Sivaruban, S., 2021. A Critical Perspective of Leadership Theories


Turner, J.R. and Baker, R., 2018. A review of leadership theories: identifying a lack of growth in the HRD leadership domain. European Journal of Training and Development.


35% OFF
Get best price for your work
  • 54000+ Project Delivered
  • 500+ Experts 24*7 Online Help

offer valid for limited time only*