5CO02 Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Sample

Introduction To Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Sample

Task 1

Evaluate the concept of evidence-based practice and assess how approaches to evidence-based practice can be used to provide insight

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a process of decision-making that integrates the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values and circumstances (APTA, 2020). EBP involves the conscientious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individuals or the management of organisations in the context of people practices and organisational issues.

Benefits of Using EBP in the Workplace

• Improved Decision-Making: EBP supports making informed decisions by relying on data, research, and facts rather than intuition or unsystematic experience (FAAN, FAAN and FAAN, 2016).
• Enhanced Quality and Outcomes: By utilizing the most current and high-quality evidence, organizations can improve the quality of their services or products and achieve better outcomes.
• Increased Efficiency: EBP can lead to more efficient processes by identifying what works best and eliminating ineffective practices.
• Greater Accountability and Transparency: EBP provides a clear rationale for decisions made, increasing accountability and transparency within the organization.

Challenges Associated with the Use of EBP in the Workplace

• Access to Quality Evidence: Finding and accessing current, relevant, and high-quality evidence can be time-consuming and challenging.
• Skills and Knowledge: Employees need skills in critical appraisal and interpretation of evidence to effectively implement EBP.
• Resistance to Change: Organizational culture and resistance to change can hinder the adoption of EBP as it often requires altering long-standing practices and beliefs.
• Resource Constraints: Implementing EBP can be resource-intensive, requiring time, training, and sometimes financial investment.

People practitioners use Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) across various functions to enhance decision-making and improve organizational outcomes (Young, 2023). In recruitment, they might use data from past recruitment drives and employee performance to refine hiring processes. For training and development, EBP involves conducting needs assessments based on performance data and evaluating training effectiveness through established models (Cardoso et al., 2021). Performance management benefits from EBP through the design of appraisal systems informed by research, while well-being programs are based on evidence linking specific practices to improved health outcomes (Young, 2023). Additionally, change management initiatives are guided by empirically validated models, and diversity and inclusion efforts are supported by research demonstrating their organizational benefits. Furthermore, EBP has been helping that practices across these areas are informed, effective, and aligned with the best available evidence. It has also been leading to more ethical and successful organizational strategies.

Evaluate one appropriate analysis tool and one appropriate analysis method that might be applied by organisations to recognise and diagnose issues, challenges, and opportunities

Criteria	SWOT Analysis (Tool)	Root Cause Analysis (Method)
Description	SWOT Analysis is a strategic planning tool used to identify Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats related to business competition or project planning.	Root Cause Analysis is a problem-solving method used to identify the underlying causes of problems or incidents.
Application for Diagnosis	Strengths & Weaknesses: Helps in identifying internal factors that are favourable or unfavourable to achieving objectives. Opportunities & Threats: Identifies external factors that the organization might exploit to defend against.	Focuses on identifying the root causes of problems or events and not just the symptoms. RCA is typically used when something goes significantly wrong and aims to prevent recurrence by addressing the core issues (Tableau, 2023).
Advantages	- Comprehensive Overview: Provides a clear, organized overview of the organization's current status. - Simplicity and Versatility: Easy to understand and can be used for a wide range of purposes. - Involvement of Multiple Perspectives: Can involve a range of perspectives and data sources.	- Addresses the Source: Helps in identifying and solving the core problems, leading to more sustainable solutions (Quality-one, 2015). - Prevents Recurrence: Aims to prevent the problem from recurring, saving resources in the long term. - Systematic Approach: Provides a structured method for analyzing and solving problems.
Disadvantages	- Subjectivity: Can be highly subjective and depends significantly on the quality of input. - Lacks Depth: Might not provide sufficient depth for understanding complex issues. - No Prioritization: Identifies factors but does not prioritize them by importance or urgency.	- Time-Consuming: Can be very time-consuming and requires detailed data collection (Quality-one, 2015). - Complexity: Might be complex and require trained personnel to conduct effectively. - Focus on Negative: Primarily focuses on problems and might overlook potential opportunities.

Explain the main principles of critical thinking and describe how these might apply to own and others’ ideas to assist objective and rational debate.

The main principles of critical thinking involve rationality and evidence (Kim, 2019). Rationality dictates that one should rely on logic and reason rather than emotions or personal biases. When applying this to debate, it means critically evaluating the logical structure of both my own and others' arguments, ensuring they are coherent and well-reasoned. The principle of evidence emphasizes the importance of supporting all claims with robust and credible data. In practice, this involves not only presenting evidence for the arguments but also critically assessing the evidence provided by others (Snyder, 2019). By adhering to these principles, individuals can engage in more objective and rational debates, fostering an environment of open inquiry, respect for diverse perspectives, and a willingness to revise opinions in light of new, compelling evidence.

I started by researching relevant data and studies on work hours and productivity. I found substantial evidence suggesting that longer hours often lead to burnout and decreased productivity over time. This was contrary to my initial idea but aligned with the principle of evidence, which emphasizes grounding decisions in solid data (Snyder, 2019). I also sought feedback from my team, asking about their current workloads, satisfaction, and ideas for improving productivity. This provided diverse perspectives and insights I hadn't considered, such as optimizing work processes and incorporating flexible work schedules.

In the end, by applying critical thinking, I moved away from my initial idea of simply increasing work hours. Instead, I developed a more nuanced approach that involved reorganizing team tasks, introducing more breaks to prevent burnout, and setting clearer goals. This approach was not only more effective but also better received by the team, demonstrating how critical thinking can lead to more objective, evidence-based, and ultimately successful outcomes.

Explain three decision-making processes that can be applied to ensure that effective outcomes are achieved.

The Rational Decision-Making Model is a systematic and step-by-step approach aimed at making optimally rational and logical decisions (N Nayab, 2018). It begins with identifying the problem, followed by gathering relevant information and generating possible solutions. Decision-makers then evaluate these alternatives, select the most viable option, and implement the chosen solution. Finally, they review the decision's outcomes to inform future decisions. This model is ideal for complex decisions where data and facts are readily available, assuming that the decision-maker is fully informed and acts rationally to maximize the outcome.

The Bounded Rationality Model has been promoting the limitations in cognitive capabilities, time, and resources that individuals face when making decisions (Igi-global, 2022). Instead of seeking the optimal solution, individuals settle for a satisfactory one that meets enough criteria to resolve the problem at hand. This model has been reflecting more closely how decisions are made in real-world scenarios where perfect information and unlimited time for decision-making are rare. It has been accounting for human limitations and emphasizes a more pragmatic approach to decision-making, focusing on reasonably good solutions rather than the best theoretical one (Kaushik and Walsh, 2019).

Group Decision-Making involves collective deliberation and decision-making, pooling together diverse sets of skills, experiences, and perspectives (van Ginkel and van Knippenberg, 2008). This approach is particularly useful for complex problems where no single individual has all the answers. The process typically involves identifying the problem, generating and evaluating a range of solutions, and then making a decision through consensus or voting. While this method can lead to more innovative and informed decisions due to the variety of inputs, it can also be subject to challenges such as groupthink. Effective group decision-making requires clear communication, conflict resolution skills, and a structured process to manage the diverse opinions and avoid common pitfalls (R Jhangiani , 2022).

Application of these models to show how to achieve organisational outcomes

In an organization aiming to launch a new product, the rational model can be used to systematically approach this complex decision. The process would start with identifying the need for a new product based on market research. Then, various departments such as R&D, marketing, and finance would gather relevant information about customer needs, technological possibilities, and budget constraints. The team would generate a range of product ideas and evaluate them based on criteria like feasibility, cost, and potential market share.

In a fast-paced industry where decisions need to be made quickly and under pressure, such as a newsroom or a financial trading floor, the bounded rationality model might be more applicable. Further, decision-makers have not the luxury of seeking the optimal solution. Further, they need to make satisfactory decisions that are "good enough" under the circumstances. For instance, a news editor need to decide which stories to run with limited information about the developing news and under tight deadlines. Consider an organization facing a strategic decision, such as entering a new market or making a significant investment. The complexity and high stakes of the decision warrant a group decision-making approach. A cross-functional team including members from strategy, finance, marketing, and operations can be formed to tackle this decision. The team needs to collaborate to define the problem, gather and share information from their respective areas of expertise and brainstorm possible courses of action. They would then discuss the pros and cons of each option, perhaps using decision-making techniques like a weighted scoring model to evaluate alternatives.

Assess three different ethical perspectives and explain how understanding of these can be used to inform and influence moral decision-making.

Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that advocates for actions that maximize overall happiness or utility (Nathanson, 2023). Proposed by philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, the core principle of utilitarianism is "the greatest good for the greatest number." This approach evaluates the morality of an action based on its outcomes or consequences (Nathanson, 2023).

Influence on Decision-Making: In practice, utilitarianism encourages decision-makers to consider the broader impact of their actions on all stakeholders involved. For instance, a city planner might decide to build a new park in an underserved neighborhood, reasoning that the benefits to the community's well-being outweigh the financial cost. While utilitarianism promotes a consideration of the greater good, it also requires careful deliberation of all potential consequences and can be challenging when predicting outcomes for large groups (Nathanson, 2023b).

Deontological Ethics (Duty-Based Ethics):

Description: Deontological ethics is centered on the belief that actions are morally right or wrong in themselves, regardless of the consequences (Alexander and Moore, 2007). It emphasizes duties and rules. For example, telling the truth is considered right even if it leads to negative outcomes. This approach focuses on the intention behind actions and adherence to moral principles or duties.

Influence on Decision-Making: Deontology influences moral decision-making by providing clear rules or duties to follow (Barrow and Khandhar, 2023). A person or organization might adhere strictly to honesty, privacy, or fairness policies and it is not the most beneficial. For instance, a journalist committed to truth-telling can refuse to publish unverified information and it has also been prioritizing ethical standards over the potential popularity or profitability of sensational news.

Virtue Ethics:

Virtue ethics focuses on the inherent character of a person rather than on specific actions. Originating from the works of Aristotle, this perspective emphasizes virtues such as courage, generosity, and honesty (Athanassoulis, 2023). It encourages individuals to cultivate good character traits and make decisions that align with these virtues.

Influence on Decision-Making: In practice, virtue ethics guides individuals to behave in ways that are consistent with good character and virtues. For example, a business leader might prioritize environmental sustainability and fair labor practices and they value responsibility and integrity. This approach has been encourgaing continuous personal growth and reflection on one's values and character (Athanassoulis, 2023).

Assessing how these theories can influence moral decision-making using people's practice examples

Utilitarianism in Healthcare Decisions:

Medical professionals often face decisions about resource allocation, treatment options, and patient care methods. Utilitarianism can guide them to choose solutions that provide the maximum benefit to the most people. For example, during a vaccine shortage, a utilitarian approach might prioritize vaccinating those most at risk or capable of spreading the disease to others, aiming to minimize overall harm and maximize benefits to population health.

Deontological Ethics in Legal Practice:

Lawyers and judges are often guided by deontological ethics, adhering to the rule of law and client confidentiality. For instance, a defense attorney might defend a client they believe to be guilty because they are duty-bound to provide the best defense possible and uphold the legal principle that everyone deserves a fair trial (Gmatclub, 2021). This adherence to duty demonstrates how deontological ethics influences decisions in legal practice.

Virtue Ethics in Education:

Educators and administrators might apply virtue ethics by focusing on developing students' character and moral reasoning. For instance, a school might implement policies and curricula that encourage honesty, empathy, and perseverance. By promoting these virtues, educators aim to influence students' decision-making processes throughout their lives, encouraging them to make choices that reflect good character, not just in school but in all aspects of life.

Appraise two different ways organisations measure financial and non-financial performance, providing one example of each.

• Financial Performance Measurement:
• Return on Investment (ROI):

Description: Return on Investment is a popular financial metric used to evaluate the efficiency and profitability of an investment. It is calculated by dividing the net profit of an investment by its cost, often expressed as a percentage. This metric helps in understanding how well an investment is performing relative to its cost.

Appraisal: ROI is a powerful tool for comparing the effectiveness of different investments and making informed decisions about where to allocate resources (Gmatclub, 2021). It is widely used because of its simplicity and clarity in representing financial returns. However, ROI has limitations; it does not account for the time value of money, and it may not provide a complete picture of longer-term strategic value. For instance, a company might use ROI to decide between two projects by selecting the one with the higher ROI, ensuring efficient use of capital and aiming to maximize shareholder value.

• Non-Financial Performance Measurement:
• Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT):

Description: The Customer Satisfaction Score is a common metric used to gauge how satisfied customers are with a company's products or services. It is mainly measured through surveys asking customers to rate their satisfaction on a scale. This metric is crucial for understanding customer loyalty, predicting repeat business, and identifying areas for improvement in products or services.

Appraisal: CSAT is an essential measure for businesses because it directly reflects the perceptions and experiences of customers, which are critical for long-term success. Higher customer satisfaction often correlates with customer retention, word-of-mouth promotion, and overall company reputation. However, it is important to note that CSAT is subjective and may not fully capture long-term customer relationship or value. For example, a retail store might track CSAT by asking customers to rate their shopping experience after checkout. Positive scores can indicate effective customer service and product satisfaction, guiding business strategies and improvements.

Explain how people practices add value in an organisation and identify two methods that might be used to measure the impact of people practices.

Attracting and Retaining Talent: Effective people practices ensure that an organization attracts and retains skilled and motivated employees. By offering competitive compensation, career development opportunities, and a positive work environment, organizations can maintain a talented workforce that drives innovation and productivity.

Enhancing Employee Engagement and Satisfaction: Through training and development, recognition programs, and feedback mechanisms, people practices enhance employee engagement and job satisfaction. Engaged employees are more likely to be committed, productive, and deliver higher quality work, contributing to organizational success.

Aligning Workforce with Organizational Goals: People practices help align the workforce's efforts with the organization's strategic goals through performance management systems, clear communication of objectives, and aligning individual goals with those of the organization. This alignment ensures that everyone is working towards the same objectives, enhancing efficiency and effectiveness.

Cultivating a Positive Organizational Culture: A strong and positive organizational culture can significantly impact employee morale, collaboration, and innovation. People practices like fostering diversity, promoting ethical behavior, and encouraging open communication contribute to creating an environment where employees feel valued and work cooperatively towards shared goals.

Methods to Measure the Impact of People Practices:

Description: Regularly conducted surveys that gather data on employee satisfaction, engagement, and other aspects of the work environment. These surveys typically include questions about job satisfaction, understanding of organizational goals, relationships with management, and work-life balance.

Impact Measurement: By analyzing the survey results, organizations can gauge the effectiveness of their people practices in fostering a positive work environment and identify areas for improvement. Changes in satisfaction and engagement scores over time can indicate the impact of specific initiatives, such as new training programs or changes in management practices (APTA, 2020). This method allows for targeted improvements and is a direct reflection of the employees' perceptions and experiences.

Turnover Rates and Retention Metrics:

Description: These metrics measure the rate at which employees leave the organization (turnover) and the rate at which they stay (retention) It is mainly measured through surveys asking customers to rate their satisfaction on a scale.. They can be broken down further to understand voluntary and involuntary turnover, turnover within specific departments, or turnover among high-performers.

Impact Measurement: Analyzing turnover and retention rates can provide insight into the effectiveness of people practices (NetSuite.com, 2021). For instance, high turnover might indicate issues with job satisfaction, inadequate compensation, or poor management whereas high retention rates might suggest successful employee engagement and satisfaction initiatives. By identifying trends and patterns in these metrics, organizations can pinpoint the strengths and weaknesses of their people practices and take corrective action.

Task 2

Analysis tools and methods

Percentage of Each Gender by Type:

The organization has a total of 260 staff members, with a gender distribution of 45.38% female, 53.85% male, and 0.77% non-binary. The male representation is slightly higher than female, which is a common trend in many industries. The presence of non-binary staff is quite low, which could be an area to explore in diversity and inclusion efforts.

Ethnicity as a Percentage Per Team:

The data shows significant variation in ethnic diversity across different teams. Some teams, such as the Property Team and Regeneration, have very high White British representation (98.99% and 100%, respectively), while others like the Governance and Community Engagement teams show more diversity with the inclusion of Indian and mixed ethnicities. This may indicate that certain departments could benefit from greater ethnic diversity to reflect wider societal demographics.

Disability Percentage as an Organizational Whole and by Teams:

There are 10 staff members with disabilities, accounting for a disability percentage of about 3.85% of the total workforce if the organization's size is 260 staff. Within specific teams, the percentage of staff with disabilities varies from 10% in several teams to 20% in People Services and the Property Team. It could be beneficial to assess the inclusiveness of the workplace for individuals with disabilities and whether adjustments or accommodations are being effectively implemented.

Salary Difference Across Genders:

The total salary for female staff is significantly lower than that for male staff, with a difference of 6,89,470.00 units of currency. The salary for non-binary staff is not comparable due to the small sample size (only 2 non-binary staff members). It is crucial to delve deeper into the reasons behind this gap, such as differences in roles, seniority, or working hours, and to evaluate if there are any gender pay equity issues that need to be addressed.

Overall Average Salary Paid by the Organisation:

The overall average salary paid by the organization is 31,757 units of currency. It is unclear whether this average considers full-time equivalency or part-time statuses. The average can mask underlying discrepancies, so it can be important to analyze the distribution of salaries within each gender and across different roles to understand the full context of pay within the organization.

Main findings

Support for Hybrid Working:

There's a strong preference for hybrid working in terms of work-life balance and well-being, with a majority of employees agreeing (161 fully agree, 86 agree) that hybrid working practices support this aspect. This suggests that employees find value in the flexibility that hybrid work provides.

Social and Support Aspects:

A significant number of employees disagree (155 disagree, 94 strongly disagree) with the statement that they miss engaging with their colleagues in the workplace, indicating that while remote work is isolating for some, most employees do not feel a strong lack of social interaction. Moreover, a majority feel unsupported when working at work (138 disagree, 102 strongly disagree) which may indicate issues with the in-office support system or a preference for the autonomy when working from home.

Challenges and Productivity:

The sentiment about remote work being challenging and affecting productivity is mixed. While some find it a challenge (10 fully agree, 63 agree) and feel it hinders productivity (69 fully agree, 79 agree), others disagree (82 disagree, 65 strongly disagree), pointing to a divide in how remote work is perceived or experienced by different employees.

Communication and Company Culture:

There's a concern that working from home negatively impacts communication and collaboration (78 disagree, 101 strongly disagree). Additionally, many employees feel less connected to the company culture since the implementation of hybrid working (39 disagree, 72 strongly disagree). These points suggest that while hybrid working has its advantages, it can also lead to challenges in maintaining company cohesion and teamwork.

Meeting Targets and Resource Accessibility:

Opinions are divided on whether employees can meet their targets and access resources from home. Some agree they can meet targets (41 fully agree, 60 agree) and access resources (47 fully agree, 100 agree), while a notable number disagree (57 disagree, 142 strongly disagree for meeting targets; 35 disagree, 112 strongly disagree for accessing resources), indicating variability in how effectively employees can work from home.

Conflict and Stress:

A good number of respondents agree that working from home removes conflict (90 fully agree, 87 agree) and they feel less stressed when away from the workplace (41 fully agree, 4 agree). This suggests that the home environment can be more conducive to personal well-being for many employees.

Recognition of Work:

Feedback is mixed regarding recognition of work, with equal numbers feeling they do (70 fully agree, 69 agree) and do not (71 disagree, 88 strongly disagree) get the same amount of recognition while working from home. This could indicate a need for better mechanisms to ensure remote workers feel valued and acknowledged.

Make justified recommendations based on the evaluation of the benefits, risks, and financial implications of potential solutions.

One recommendation

Aspect	Details
Recommendation	Implement a comprehensive diversity and inclusion (D&I) program focusing on gender pay equity and increasing minority representation (McKinsey & Company, 2022).
Justification	- The gender pay gap indicates potential pay inequity.
-	- Lack of ethnic diversity could hinder innovation and problem-solving.
Benefits	- Enhanced Reputation: Attract better talent, improve customer perception.
-	- Increased Employee Satisfaction and Retention: Higher job satisfaction, lower turnover.
-	- Broader Talent Pool: Recruitment from a wider range of skills and perspectives.
-	- Innovation and Performance: Diverse teams potentially more innovative and higher-performing.
Costs	- Program Implementation: Development and implementation costs, including training and specialist hiring.
-	- Pay Adjustments: Potential increase in payroll for equity adjustments.
-	- Ongoing Monitoring: Costs for continual monitoring and compliance.
Risk Implications	- Cultural Resistance: Potential temporary morale impact due to resistance to change (Olmstead, 2022).
-	- Financial Risk: Short-term financial outlay may affect financial performance.
-	- Perception Risk: Initiatives might be perceived as insincere if not communicated effectively.
Risk Mitigation	- Transparent Communication: Clearly explain the changes and their long-term benefits.
-	- Phased Salary Adjustments: Manage financial impact by phasing in changes.
-	- Inclusive Program Development: Involve employees in D&I program development to increase engagement.
-	- Continuous Evaluation: Regularly assess and adjust the D&I program's effectiveness.

Recommendation two

Aspect	Details
Recommendation	Enhance remote working support and develop strategies to maintain company culture and communication.
Justification	- Employees value hybrid working for work-life balance but feel disconnected from company culture.
-	- Communication and collaboration challenges are evident.
Benefits	- Improved Employee Morale: By addressing the challenges of remote work, employee satisfaction can increase.
-	- Increased Productivity: Better support can lead to more effective remote work.
-	- Enhanced Company Culture: Fostering a strong culture remotely can improve overall company cohesion.
-	- Retention: Employees who feel supported are more likely to stay, reducing turnover costs (Olmstead, 2022).
Costs	- Technology and Training: Investment in communication tools and training for remote collaboration.
-	- Program Development: Costs associated with developing programs to sustain culture remotely.
-	- Management Training: Costs for training leaders to manage remote teams effectively.
Risk Implications	- Overdependence on Technology: Potential over-reliance on virtual communication tools.
-	- Resistance to Change: Some employees may prefer traditional office culture and may resist new initiatives.
-	- Dilution of Culture: Risk that company culture could be diluted without face-to-face interactions.
Risk Mitigation	- Balanced Approach: Combine remote work with occasional in-office meetings to maintain personal connections.
--	- Regular Check-Ins: Establish frequent virtual check-ins to ensure employees feel supported and engaged.
-	- Feedback Mechanism: Continuously gather employee feedback to refine remote working practices and ensure they meet employee needs (Olmstead, 2022).
-	- Cultural Initiatives: Implement virtual team-building activities and recognition programs to sustain company culture and team spirit.

References

Alexander, L. and Moore, M. (2007). Deontological Ethics. [online] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/ [Accessed 4 Jan. 2024].

APTA (2020). Components of Evidence-Based Practice. [online] APTA. Available at: https://www.apta.org/patient-care/evidence-based-practice-resources/components-of-evidence-based-practice#:~:text=Evidence%2Dbased%20practice%20includes%20the.

Athanassoulis, N. (2023). Virtue Ethics. [online] Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://iep.utm.edu/virtue/.

Barrow, J.M. and Khandhar, P.B. (2023). Deontology. [online] Nih.gov. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459296/.

Cardoso, D., Couto, F., Cardoso, A.F., Bobrowicz-Campos, E., Santos, L., Rodrigues, R., Coutinho, V., Pinto, D., Ramis, M.-A., Rodrigues, M.A. and Apóstolo, J. (2021). The Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Educational Program on Undergraduate Nursing Students’ EBP Knowledge and Skills: A Cluster Randomized Control Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 18(1), p.293. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010293.

FAAN, K.M.W., PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FAAN, S.D.-B., PhD, RN, FNP-BC and FAAN, M.F.T., PhD, RN, ANEF (2016). Translation of Evidence into Nursing and Health Care, Second Edition. [online] Google Books. Springer Publishing Company. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=vDCoCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=EBP+supports+making+informed+decisions+by+relying+on+data [Accessed 4 Jan. 2024].

Gmatclub (2021). Is it necessary for defense lawyers to believe that the clients they. [online] GMAT Club Forum. Available at: https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-it-necessary-for-defense-lawyers-to-believe-that-the-clients-they-343570.html [Accessed 4 Jan. 2024].

Igi-global (2022). What is Bounded Rationality | IGI Global. [online] www.igi-global.com. Available at: https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/bounded-rationality/2786 [Accessed 4 Jan. 2024].

Kaushik, V. and Walsh, C.A. (2019). Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research. Social Sciences, [online] 8(9). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255.

Kim, B. (2019). Introduction to Critical Thinking. open.library.okstate.edu. [online] Available at: https://open.library.okstate.edu/criticalthinking/chapter/__unknown__-2/.

McKinsey & Company (2022). What Is diversity, equity, and Inclusion (DE&I)? | McKinsey. [online] www.mckinsey.com. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-diversity-equity-and-inclusion.

N Nayab (2018). Pros and Cons of the Rational Decision Making Approach. [online] Bright Hub PM. Available at: https://www.brighthubpm.com/methods-strategies/121817-is-using-the-rational-decision-making-approach-a-rational-choice/ [Accessed 4 Jan. 2024].

Nathanson, S. (2023a). Act and Rule Utilitarianism. [online] Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://iep.utm.edu/util-a-r/.

Nathanson, S. (2023b). Act and Rule Utilitarianism. [online] Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://iep.utm.edu/util-a-r/.

NetSuite.com (2021). 12 Employee Turnover and Retention KPIs to Measure in 2021. [online] Oracle NetSuite. Available at: https://www.netsuite.com/portal/resource/articles/human-resources/employee-turnover-kpis-metrics.shtml#:~:text=Calculating%20employee%20turnover%20also%20allows [Accessed 4 Jan. 2024].

Olmstead, L. (2022). Resistance to Change: 5 Causes & Best Practices for Your Organization. [online] Whatfix. Available at: https://whatfix.com/blog/causes-of-resistance-to-change/ [Accessed 4 Jan. 2024].

Quality-one (2015). RCA | Root Cause Analysis | Quality-One. [online] Quality-one.com. Available at: https://quality-one.com/rca/ [Accessed 4 Jan. 2024].

R Jhangiani (2022). Group Decision Making – Principles of Social Psychology – 1st International Edition. [online] Opentextbc.ca. Available at: https://opentextbc.ca/socialpsychology/chapter/group-decision-making/ [Accessed 4 Jan. 2024].

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research methodology: an Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, [online] 104(1), pp.333–339. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319304564.

Tableau (2023). Root cause analysis, explained with examples and methods. [online] Tableau. Available at: https://www.tableau.com/learn/articles/root-cause-analysis#:~:text=Root%20cause%20analysis%20(RCA)%20is.

van Ginkel, W.P. and van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), pp.82–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.08.005.

Young, J. (2023). CIPD | Evidence-based practice for effective decision-making | Factsheets. [online] CIPD. Available at: https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/evidence-based-practice-factsheet/.